Amir, That is a valid point, though it is one I would have to respectfully disagree with. Personally, I would never change a technique in a FOR REAL situation simply to prevent harm to my attacker. I would never do that.Yet, at the same time, I am never at any stage ACTIVELY SEEKING to harm that attacker. If I can at all help it, he will not be greviously harmed by my technique. He may however be harmed by his own resistance. But through the execution of each and every technique, he is always offered the choice of not continuing. Believe me, I try my absolute utmost to avoid any kind of physical confrontation whatsoever. But having found myself in an attack (and yes I have), I only want to end it, not prolong it or destroy the attacker.
The techniques of the Aikikai are borne through the doctrines of O'Sensei and personally, I see no contradiction in practicing my Aikido and not seeking to hurt an opponent.
And I am not trying to set up an argument my friend but perhaps you could offer me something and tell me what your own intention is when faced with an attack, and again, I mean outside the dojo?
Thank you.
Yr most obdt hmble srvt,
Jenna
I am always very impressed at the compassion of those who can concern themselves about the well being of someone trying to do them harm. While I completely agree with this part of your statement
Yet, at the same time, I am never at any stage ACTIVELY SEEKING to harm that attacker.
I can't wrap my head around this part
If I can at all help it, he will not be greviously harmed by my technique.
I guess I haven't evolved that far, as the whole concept is completely foreign to me. My feeling is that what happens to him is a consequence of his decision to attack me. I really admire those who think like you do. :asian: