Are you suggesting the other gods and goddesses are real?
I would say there is every bit as much objective evidence to support the existence of Zues, Odin, Ra or Quetzalcoatl as there is of any other deity.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you suggesting the other gods and goddesses are real?
I would say there is every bit as much objective evidence to support the existence of Zues, Odin, Ra or Quetzalcoatl as there is of any other deity.
As did Dionysus and Triumph.Na we have eyewitness accounts of Jesus his life, his death and his resurrection
As did Dionysus and Triumph.
Molek Tause had some guy come to earth as well.If you say so
And while we are at it, count Heracles & Perseus.If you say so
Na we have eyewitness accounts of Jesus his life, his death and his resurrection
A book written by eyewitnesses like I said.............No, you don't. You have a book (actually, it's a collection of short stories, and a lot of the ones intended for the anthology were left out by the editors) that makes lots of unsupported (and unsupportable) claims. Pretty much the same evidence provided by other religions.
And while we are at it, count Heracles & Perseus.
Yet they differ.A book written by eyewitnesses like I said.............
A book written by eyewitnesses like I said.............
Just like all eyewitnesses. Ever talk to 6 people tay saw the same thing? I haveYet they differ.
We don't actually know that. We also do not know what the church took out of the stories allegedly written by eye witnesses, we do know it was highly edited by those who were not eye witnesses.. And we do not actually know if those that actually witnessed it wrote anything at all. Could be someone they talked to or told the stories too. Kind of like all the writings of Buddha, and I think Confucius and more than likely Lao Tzu
Sure we do. You choose to believe what you will. Paul says he saw what he saw and wrote what he wrote so you can believe it or not thats your choice
Yet they differ.
Now your talking faith and belief which is fine....but eye witnesses, to me, insinuates historic fact and since we do not know if Paul did, or did not, write anything and we do not know, if he did write it, if those who translated it kept 100% to what he wrote and we have no idea what the church may or may not have removed....it is not historic fact.
LOL except the first people to write of Jesus did so while he was still alive and just after his death not 100s of years later. But i see the viciousness in your posts so your minds made up. SadThey weren't contemporaries, were they? Hundreds of years separated some of the authors from the time they were 'witnessing.' Myths and fables are subject to evolution as they are passed down through the years. Each "eyewitness" putting their own flourish on the story. Not only that, there were translation errors as the stories moved from one language to the next as well as copy errors when publishing new books.
I'll bet the first to make up such fantastic stories of magic and witchcraft never considered that down the road that they would be taken seriously and lead to so much death and destruction.
LOL except the first people to write of Jesus did so while he was still alive and just after his death not 100s of years later. But i see the viciousness in your posts so your minds made up. Sad
I don't see viciousness
the fine details could have changed but the general story is true. If thats your debate then nothing pre photograhic evidence should be believed due to changes in translationthere and again we do not know if they wrote anything while they were alive little alone while Jesus lived. And what was written has been translated and edited (bigtime by the church) over the centuries.... it is highly unlikely what we read today 100% accurate as compared to what truly happened. Not saying if any of it is true or false but what we read today is highly likely not the same as what actually happened. Basically I do not think it would stand up on court as proof of anything other than someone wrote it
We dont know if Cesar was real either but we believe eyewitness accounts. I have no reason not to believe the eyewitnesses that were around not just Christians but other religions as well Speak of Jesus