Icewater said:If you create an amendment to that saying that gays can also marry, then you are giving them SPECIAL rights that are contradictory to the present law. It would be the same as saying that a person has the right to marry their dog.
they are just seeking a rewording of the law, from my understanding.
as opposed to beastiality, a more reasonable arguement would be child marriages and polygamy, as referenced in the thread I just provided. It starts on the first page, around post #10