Ranks in Swordsmanship?

thardey

Master Black Belt
Joined
Feb 13, 2007
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
94
Location
Southern Oregon
A long time ago my instructor (Historical Western Fencing - 16th, 17th centuries) mentioned the idea of a ranking system in fencing. It was just in passing, and I didn't get a lot of details, but I'm wondering if there is still a similar ranking in place these days, or if anyone has heard of it.

He basically said you started as a student, or apprentice, then after about 5 years you became a "Swordsman", then much later you became a "Sword Master". (In the book, The Princess Bride, Inigo achieves the mythical rank of "Sword Wizard".)

Does anyone give these types of ranks (only the first two, obviously), or seen it legitimately done? Or is it an informal type of thing, subject to each individual's bragging needs?
 

Langenschwert

Master Black Belt
Joined
Apr 12, 2007
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
353
Location
Calgary, AB, Canada
Does anyone give these types of ranks (only the first two, obviously), or seen it legitimately done? Or is it an informal type of thing, subject to each individual's bragging needs?

Classical fencing gives the title of Maestro to those that pass the appropriate tests.

HES schools generally use some modification of medieval and renaissance ranks: Scholar, Free Scholar, Provost, Master. The title of Master in HES is controversial, since there are no living lineages to give out the title of Master in longsword, for example. Schools are free to use the term, though. My own school has the rank of Master in its structure, but no one has achieved it yet. :) There are few that would claim the rank of Master in HES, regardless of skill level. Many (but not all) claim the word is too "loaded" to be used. :)

Best regards,

-Mark
 

lklawson

Grandmaster
Joined
Feb 3, 2005
Messages
5,036
Reaction score
1,680
Location
Huber Heights, OH
Travis;

The historical ranks are Schollar, Journeyman, Provost, and Master.
IMS, Terry Brown's book, English Martial Arts, records the historical incarnation of Masters of Defense as using the term Free Scholar instead of Journeyman. I'll have to look it up tonight when I get home to be sure.

Peace favor your sword,
Kirk
 

nitflegal

Green Belt
Joined
May 27, 2008
Messages
111
Reaction score
12
Location
MA, USA
Approaching these as an actual combat art, I'm not sure how you could characterize anyone as master. Until you've taken a skill and used it for real, I think the inference that you've mastered the skill is a bit dodgy. Considering how much of this is educated recreation of combat proven techniques in the hope that we're not missing something critical, it's a tough sell.

Matt
 

Langenschwert

Master Black Belt
Joined
Apr 12, 2007
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
353
Location
Calgary, AB, Canada
Approaching these as an actual combat art, I'm not sure how you could characterize anyone as master. Until you've taken a skill and used it for real, I think the inference that you've mastered the skill is a bit dodgy. Considering how much of this is educated recreation of combat proven techniques in the hope that we're not missing something critical, it's a tough sell.

Matt

Tough sell to consider someone a "master" in the sense that he's unbelievably awesome, yes. However, the principles of bladed combat aren't rocket science. After a good amount of time has passed, perhaps we can use the term in a more "loaded" sense.

Now, if my Master you mean someone who has the equivalent of a "Master's Degree", or say the equivalent of a school "headmaster" then fine. That's up to each organization to do for themselves. We have the rank of "Master" in our school, but it's more hypothetical, since not even the founder has achieved it. He's perfectly satisfied with "Provost". :) Would I like to get the rank? Sure, why not. But I'd just rather be known as someone who can fight and happens to teach well than a "master" who can't do either. ;)

Best regards,

-Mark
 

lklawson

Grandmaster
Joined
Feb 3, 2005
Messages
5,036
Reaction score
1,680
Location
Huber Heights, OH
Would I like to get the rank? Sure, why not. But I'd just rather be known as someone who can fight and happens to teach well than a "master" who can't do either. ;)
Wasn't it George Silver who complains about all the "Masters" who aren't?


Regardless, there is a certain logic and appeal to letting you reputation speak for itself.

Peace favor your sword,
Kirk
 

Jeff Richardson

Yellow Belt
Joined
Mar 31, 2008
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Location
Milwaukie Oregon
The term "Master" or "Maestro" simply means highly qualified teacher. It's like having a doctorate degree in the art of fencing.

Amongst the historical guild systems it meant you were qualified to run your own school by the fencing guild (essentially a union).
 

MA-Caver

Sr. Grandmaster
MT Mentor
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
14,960
Reaction score
312
Location
Chattanooga, TN
Tough sell to consider someone a "master" in the sense that he's unbelievably awesome, yes. However, the principles of bladed combat aren't rocket science.

-Mark

"You know how to use that thing?" ....
"of course the pointed end goes into the other man!" ....
"this is going to take a lot of work."
 
Top