We had an issue recently affecting a group we belong to that uses the public library for meetings. The group is for school-age children. Someone had just gotten a pistol and was carrying it openly at the library. This made some people nervous--he is on permanent disability due to a head injury that caused him to suffer confusion, reduced mental capacity, and mood swings, and is always accompanied by his wife who looks after him, and he was following people he deemed "suspicious" in apparent hopes of having a chance to intervene--so they spoke to a librarian and learned that the library prohibited weapons, even with a permit. The couple was informed of this and left the library and group, offended that someone would raise the issue and stating that they should actually feel safer knowing an armed person was around. It's been most unfortunate.
But none of that is what I'm curious about. One member of the group later revealed that she concealed-carries. She said that in Indiana, where we live, a permit is easily obtained and allows both open and concealed carry. We've since learned that that's true. This was a great surprise to me, as I grew up in NY where it seemed you virtually needed to be a police officer to carry a concealed weapon; my recollection is that those permits went mostly to judges and DAs and parole officers who were part of the criminal justice system and had reason for concern.
The discussion among my friends at work, who come from all over the country, has now become this: Was I right to be surprised that there was no additional restriction on concealed carry? I found it quite surprising and had expected it'd be a large extra hurdle, as did my colleague from Ohio, but others found it unremarkable. Is it usual for a concealed carry permit to be separate from a basic ownership permit?
But none of that is what I'm curious about. One member of the group later revealed that she concealed-carries. She said that in Indiana, where we live, a permit is easily obtained and allows both open and concealed carry. We've since learned that that's true. This was a great surprise to me, as I grew up in NY where it seemed you virtually needed to be a police officer to carry a concealed weapon; my recollection is that those permits went mostly to judges and DAs and parole officers who were part of the criminal justice system and had reason for concern.
The discussion among my friends at work, who come from all over the country, has now become this: Was I right to be surprised that there was no additional restriction on concealed carry? I found it quite surprising and had expected it'd be a large extra hurdle, as did my colleague from Ohio, but others found it unremarkable. Is it usual for a concealed carry permit to be separate from a basic ownership permit?