Ahnuld gets 'is butt handed to him...

R

rmcrobertson

Guest
Our esteemed gov'nor, Mr. Schwarzenegger, just got soundly whomped on the question of taking state workers' retirement benefits through STRS away from them, and replacing everything with private 401Ks to which the State would make no contributions at all.

Heh-heh. May it be the first of many whompings.
 

Cruentus

Grandmaster
Joined
Apr 17, 2002
Messages
7,161
Reaction score
130
Location
At an OP in view of your house...
rmcrobertson said:
Our esteemed gov'nor, Mr. Schwarzenegger, just got soundly whomped on the question of taking state workers' retirement benefits through STRS away from them, and replacing everything with private 401Ks to which the State would make no contributions at all.

Heh-heh. May it be the first of many whompings.

The fact that they would do that literally makes me sick. Please tell me that hasn't gone through...
 
OP
R

rmcrobertson

Guest
Well, the actor tried. He got whupped on it. And me too on the "sick" part--what it was really all about, and is all about, is political and economic power, as the Gov (and I mean this in the full Mel Brooks sense) showed when he fired all the STRS commissioners who opposed him.

Nothing like a multi-millionaire actor trying to destroy a retirement system that works beautifully, has been financially sound right from the git-go, and provides a decent retirement for literally hundreds of thousands of workers.

The plan was to change the system after about 2007, so that new hires would have a vested interest in hating their seniors in the profession and the various unions would have more and more internal trouble. Nice, eh?

Actually, it's worked out as, "Nice try, Sparky," for the Gov. Whose poll numbers are plummeting. heh-heh.
 

arnisador

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Aug 28, 2001
Messages
44,573
Reaction score
456
Location
Terre Haute, IN
I don't know much about the retirement system changes he was promoting. Overall he's seemed to have had some success...but that's the view from Indiana.
 

Feisty Mouse

Senior Master
MTS Alumni
Joined
Jun 15, 2004
Messages
3,322
Reaction score
31
Location
Indiana
rmcrobertson said:
Our esteemed gov'nor, Mr. Schwarzenegger, just got soundly whomped on the question of taking state workers' retirement benefits through STRS away from them, and replacing everything with private 401Ks to which the State would make no contributions at all.
WOW. I'm am very glad that did not go through.
 

BrandiJo

Master of Arts
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
1,603
Reaction score
14
im not sure but i think it sounds like a good idea that it didnt make it
 
OP
R

rmcrobertson

Guest
State Teachers' Retirement System. There's a comparable plan for State workers in California.

For example: rather than Social Security (by the way, you don't get to double-dip benefits when you retire) they take a percentage from your paycheck every month in pre-tax dollars and the State matches the deduction. For me, I kick in about, oh, 475/mo. and it gets matched; the loot goes into a State fund.

You're vested after 5 years; when you retire (it usually takes around 25-30 to build sufficient equity for the benefits to be useful), you get what you've laid away on a montly basis.

I feel sure that some of you guys will complain that teachers shouldn't be allowed such largesse; well, the real question is why you AREN'T. It's a good program, a good deal and well-run financially--good all around, including good for the State for various reasons.

Yes, California's in financial trouble. One big reason: the enormous prison program, and the extravagant power of the correctional officers' union. Funnily enough, Ahnuld has gone after teachers and nurses, not them.
 

ginshun

2nd Black Belt
Joined
Nov 10, 2004
Messages
809
Reaction score
26
Location
Merrill, WI
Sounds like a good program.

You don't actually get to do that instead of Social Security do you? Or is it that you can choose to do it in addition to SS?

Honestly though, it doesn't sound all that much different than a 401K type plan. What is the difference, is it just that the state wouldn't match what you put in if it changed to a 401K? If that is the case, I can agee, that would suck big time.

But I can see how it would save a lot of money for the state. Thats government for you, screw the people to help themselves.

Kind of like Social Security, I am pretty sure that I will never get any back, regardless of how many 10's of thousands I will hae put in by the time I retire.
 
OP
P

PeachMonkey

Guest
ginshun said:
Kind of like Social Security, I am pretty sure that I will never get any back, regardless of how many 10's of thousands I will hae put in by the time I retire.
If you vote for politicians that build massive deficits while giving tax breaks to the rich, without ever repaying the "IOUs" they place in the Social Security trust fund, you'll have no one to blame for that situation but yourself.
 

michaeledward

Grandmaster
Joined
Mar 1, 2003
Messages
6,063
Reaction score
82
Eleanor Clift, one of the true 'Liberal Media' people, has an interesting article on Governor Schwarzenegger's current crash and burn in this week's Newsweek.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7516144/site/newsweek/

April 15 - Observing from afar, I had the feeling that California’s Mr. Wonderful had lost his way politically. From a differently-abled politician who could bridge the partisan divide, Arnold Schwarzenegger had become Bush Lite, sinking in the polls and squandering the bipartisan goodwill he once had.

....

His pension reform plan is analogous to George Bush’s social-security privatization with the same disastrous reception, and his redistricting proposal to gain Republican advantage looks like Tom DeLay’s Texas all over again. Emboldened by the reception he received at the Republican Convention last summer, Schwarzenegger fell into the trap of thinking he has national potential and that he could bypass the Democratic-controlled legislature and govern by initiatives propelled onto the state ballot.
 
Top