Women of Kamatuuran

Tez3

Sr. Grandmaster
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
27,608
Reaction score
4,901
Location
England
This is tough. I don't want to snipe or be mean. Your argument cries out for a response. There's no way to respond honestly without saying "I disagree strongly, and here's why." So with respect here are the major points of disagreement and the reasons for them:

This is a lot to reply to. I have attempted to simply state a position. This is the way I teach. Everyone, has an opinion. We disagree.

I am on this board to discuss. I don't expect you to "change your mind about your beliefs. I except your criticisms. But, I stand by my position. Thank you.


I agree with Exile, Tellners post was excellant and easy to understand. Without being rude I have to ask tuturuhan if he actually has enough time to train with the sheer amount of posts he puts on here?
My martial arts are for fighting, my spiritual needs come from my religion and beliefs. I still, as I posted elsewhere about this, feel I'm being partonised by his female mystique stuff. Tellner expressed it better than I did though!
 

tellner

Senior Master
Joined
Nov 18, 2005
Messages
4,379
Reaction score
240
Location
Orygun
I do not have all the answers. Kamatuuran means truth. My teacher emphasized the idea of uncovering truth.

Abraham Lincoln once asked "How many legs does a dog have, if you call a tail a leg?"
When someone answered "Five" he replied "No. Calling a tail a leg does not make it one."

Kamatuuran may translate to truth. It doesn't mean that what you are necessarily teaching the truth. What it does is provide a frame that puts you at a rhetorical advantage. The polite listener grants at some level that you are providing The Truth(tm). Disagreement is at best error and at worst a lie.

As to your specific question, each individual is different. Yet, in general there are distinctions: up/down, in/out, male/female, etc.
For someone who lays claim to Taoist credentials you seem awfully fond of Western dualism. Why? How does this square with the idea that at its very core each of these supposedly opposite concepts contains the essence of the other?


Other traditions emphasizing "following the tao" in training:

1) Japanese: Naginata clases, have traditionally been all female classes. Thought the long weapon was originally taught to samuari.

2) Chinese: Wing Chun: In oral tradition was "originated and taught to women"

3) Educational Trends: Studies have indicated that young girls have increased their math skills by being in all female classes.

4) Neurological Studies: The latest brain studies show conclusively that the female brain is different then the male brain. The two hemispheres of the brain indicate a male and female perspective and fit the natural observations of the Tao.

1) Naginata became a "female" weapon in fairly recent times, during the brutally imposed period of totalitarian peace known as the shogunate. When swords and halberds were used in war men learned the nagainata. Traditional systems include it in their curriculum. The distinction got legs in a period when there was no war, there were no reality checks and Japanese culture took some odd inward-gazing turns.

2) Lots of styles have founder's legends. How does this demonstrate that men and women should be taught differently? How does this square with the fact that Wing Chun is primarily practiced by men? If the legends are correct, and we have no more reason to believe they are than are any other founding myths, Ng Wing Chun was a Buddhist nun, not a Taoist.

3) By your own standards women should not be taught math since it's a "male" activity. The reason that many learn better in all female settings is very simple. In a class of mixed men and women, the men tend to dominate the discussion and the instructor's attention. Young women (especially) feel much less free to speak up or put themselves forward when there are men around. In classes where they feel free to take on the "masculine" traits of speaking up, getting into the conversation and not acting "hidden", "secret" or "dark" they perform better. The implications for your chosen teaching methods should be obvious.

4) How much of the difference is biological, how much is training, how important the differences are and what they really are are all matters of serious investigation, much of it exceedingly preliminary. What you are doing here is looking for justification for attitudes you already had, for validation. You might better serve your students by looking to learn something you didn't know before, to try and find out what will best serve them and allow them to become better fighters.

The point, I am not teaching something new. I am learning new things. As such, I don't teach others for the sake of teaching. I teach to allow my students to "teach me"

And there is the essence. Your students are there to serve you. You are not there to serve them. They are there for your benefit, not you for theirs. That explains all the important differences. If you teach in order to impart knowledge and help the students gain skill you will approach it one way. If you teach in order to benefit yourself you will do it in another.

I certainly do not deny the personal benefits that come from teaching others. If nothing else you learn humility when the entire class faithfully copies exactly what you did, including every mistake and imperfection. They are side-effects. When they become the goal teaching itself suffers.
 

tellner

Senior Master
Joined
Nov 18, 2005
Messages
4,379
Reaction score
240
Location
Orygun
[Exile and Tez3 say some kind things]

*doffs cap*
*tugs forelock*

Thankee, guv'nor.
 

exile

To him unconquered.
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
10,665
Reaction score
251
Location
Columbus, Ohio
[Exile and Tez3 say some kind things]

*doffs cap*
*tugs forelock*

Thankee, guv'nor.

Arrrr, 'ee be welcoom, then! :)

... hmmm, that won't do—World Talk-Like-A-Pirate Day still eight months off...

But seriously, and back on topic, this latest long post of your is again right on the money, tellner. I don't know if it will be enough to get the light to come on where it (badly!) needs to, though... :banghead:
 

Tez3

Sr. Grandmaster
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
27,608
Reaction score
4,901
Location
England
[Exile and Tez3 say some kind things]

*doffs cap*
*tugs forelock*

Thankee, guv'nor.

Not kind, true! (and another very good post!) And I'm bowing to you!

On a little point mentioned about women doing maths, Dr. Rosi Sexton is a British female Pro MMA fighter who recently fought in America and has been signed by Bodog. Her doctorate is in advanced mathematics.
 
OP
T

tuturuhan

Orange Belt
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
Location
S.F. Bay Area
I agree with Exile, Tellners post was excellant and easy to understand. Without being rude I have to ask tuturuhan if he actually has enough time to train with the sheer amount of posts he puts on here?
My martial arts are for fighting, my spiritual needs come from my religion and beliefs. I still, as I posted elsewhere about this, feel I'm being partonised by his female mystique stuff. Tellner expressed it better than I did though!

I train everyday. My ability speaks for itself.
 

Tez3

Sr. Grandmaster
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
27,608
Reaction score
4,901
Location
England
I train everyday. My ability speaks for itself.

So do I but? Us MMA lot are a barbaric lot I guess, I don't sit there wondering what colours are for what, I just think how I'm going to tap/knock out my opponent but then I'm not so barbaric that I would kill one of my children to save the other, what a horrible thought.
I've said before that your posts go over my head, I really have missed the point of them and as kids over here say " Am I bovvered?" Resoundingly no.
 

shesulsa

Columbia Martial Arts Academy
MT Mentor
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
May 27, 2004
Messages
27,182
Reaction score
486
Location
Not BC, Not DC
tuturuhan,

I asked before in another thread, but I think you got distracted by some other posters. :)

Have you ever seen or worked with Mr. Michael DeAlba of Farang Mu Sul who is also in the SF Bay area?

Thank you,

ss
 
OP
T

tuturuhan

Orange Belt
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
Location
S.F. Bay Area
Abraham Lincoln once asked "How many legs...

Wow...lots of critique...lots of flaming. But, no discussion no middle ground. Obviously,you do not want to hear what I have to say. You don't have to read me...

Do you have videos of yourself posted. I posted mine. I'd love to see your method. Truth is not always exhibited in words. A true master, can tell the fighting ability of a warrior simply by the way they move.

In this way, I get to question. Now wouldn't that me fair. No anger, no flaming.
 
OP
T

tuturuhan

Orange Belt
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
Location
S.F. Bay Area
tuturuhan,

I asked before in another thread, but I think you got distracted by some other posters. :)

Have you ever seen or worked with Mr. Michael DeAlba of Farang Mu Sul who is also in the SF Bay area?

Thank you,

ss

Sorry, for not replying. Yes, I have met him. One of my students, Felipe Macay, 5th degree Okinawan, who is also a student of Clarence Lee is a good friend of Michael De Alba.

He was orginally, a hapikdo instructor. He created his own style and does a knife fighting method. He is quite popular in Portugal where he does seminars and has a pretty big following. The last time I saw him was at his tournament in San Francisco.

Would you like me to get more information for you. I could ask Felipe?
 

tellner

Senior Master
Joined
Nov 18, 2005
Messages
4,379
Reaction score
240
Location
Orygun
Abraham Lincoln once asked "How many legs...

Wow...lots of critique...lots of flaming. But, no discussion no middle ground. Obviously,you do not want to hear what I have to say. You don't have to read me...

Do you have videos of yourself posted. I posted mine. I'd love to see your method. Truth is not always exhibited in words. A true master, can tell the fighting ability of a warrior simply by the way they move.

In this way, I get to question. Now wouldn't that me fair. No anger, no flaming.

Critique? Yes. To put it bluntly you're wrong on a whole bunch of things. If you're going to put stuff out there as "The Truth" you have to expect to be challenged. What you have done so far is say "I'm right! I'm right! See how right I am!" Where it's short on facts and deficient in logic expect to get taken to task.

Flaming? No. What we have here is logic, facts and your own words being marshalled against some unfounded opinions, a lot of errors and some very shoddy attitudes about women, most of which belong in the dustbin of history.

Middle ground? Depends. Where you're right I'll be the first to say "You're right." Where your facts are wrong and your ideas are bad you need to learn to accept that people won't agree with you just for the sake of agreeing. That's how discussion among equals works.

Your last bit, duel by YouTube is senseless. It's at the level of "Don't believe me? Put up your dukes!" In other words "I can kill you, so I must be right." Being able to hit someone does not make you an authority on religion, science, history, women or anything else. Back up what you have to say with facts, logic, something besides "I am the Truth" and we can have a serious discussion and perhaps come to agreement in areas where we do not agree. So far you haven't done that.
 

shesulsa

Columbia Martial Arts Academy
MT Mentor
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
May 27, 2004
Messages
27,182
Reaction score
486
Location
Not BC, Not DC
Sorry, for not replying. Yes, I have met him. One of my students, Felipe Macay, 5th degree Okinawan, who is also a student of Clarence Lee is a good friend of Michael De Alba.

He was orginally, a hapikdo instructor. He created his own style and does a knife fighting method. He is quite popular in Portugal where he does seminars and has a pretty big following. The last time I saw him was at his tournament in San Francisco.

Would you like me to get more information for you. I could ask Felipe?
Thank you, sir, I was just asking. Mr. DeAlba used to train in Hwarangdo, I know, and he's also a member here on MartialTalk.
 

Rich Parsons

A Student of Martial Arts
Founding Member
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Oct 13, 2001
Messages
16,835
Reaction score
1,079
Location
Michigan
The woman of Kamatuuran practice the deep, the dark and the hidden. They keep their knives hidden and their secrets...secret.

Gura (teacher) Michelle Bautista...and Gura Cathy Macay and Guro Felipe Macay performing in the SF Bay Area:



Do disrespect meant just asking a question.

The first lady in the video link is using a blade for her demo. Could you tell me what the blade is made of? Was it a live blade or a trainer. Both have negatives and positives. She has nice flow, I was just curious to the length of the blade and the mass of the blade.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
T

tuturuhan

Orange Belt
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
Location
S.F. Bay Area
Do disrespect meant just asking a question.

The first lady in the video link is using a blade for her demo. Could you tell me what the blade is made of? Was it a live blade or a trainer. Both have negatives and positives. She has nice flow, I was just curious to the length of the blade and the mass of the blade.

Thank you...for the respect.

Gura (teacher) Michelle Bautista is using a "kampilan". It was a "live blade". It was more than 42 inches.

In my opinion, you are correct, their is a huge difference between a "live blade" and a trainer. There is also a difference in the following major ways of using a live blade.

1) In the air...you worry only about cutting yourself.

2) Against a target...you learn eye hand cordination to the target and
the diffences between the percussive nature of the stick vs. the slicing, thrusting, manipulating nature of the sword.

(Each sword is different. Each sword talks to you as to how it wants to be held. Each culture (e.g. japanese, chinese, pilipino, indian, european) has an influence on how the sword wants you to use it. Each individual sword, as a different, height, length, weight, construction of material, and balace. In our method, "today" we strive "to be like water" to any weapon that is wielded, regardless of original culture or style.)

Please view the following and note the following:
1) footwork-allowing the practitioner to not simply go forward and backward, but around the opponent.

2) slicing-How the blade is turned "palm up and palm down" as the practitioner "goes inside" to slice the neck in a fluid manner. This particular demonstration illustrates how the "tai chi sword" demands to be used in a "push sword" manner.

3) manipulation/reaction-to the opponent as the defender, counters the intitial strike.

4) free-style-note that the action is freestyle and not arranged or planned. Of course, it is not real combat. The fight would have been over, after the first counter-thrust or counter-slice.

chinese gim/sword moving target: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZkrOZWI8OU&mode=related&search=

In the second video, done with a non-moving target. The emphasis is again on the circular footwork to come in and out in terms of distance. More importantly, the weapon is a live blade...demonstrating the finesse and control needed not to harm the human target. Note again the thrusting to the body and the slices to the neck.

gim non-moving target: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HT3skN_u1s&mode=related&search=

Best wishes,
Tuhan Joseph T. Oliva Arriola
 

Carol

Crazy like a...
MT Mentor
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
20,311
Reaction score
541
Location
NH
Moderator Note

Attention all users: please keep the conversation polite and respectful.

- Carol Kaur -
- MT Moderator -
 

MJS

Administrator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
30,187
Reaction score
430
Location
Cromwell,CT
Mod Note

Thread moved to The Great Debate

Mike Slosek
MT Supermod
 

guramicmac

Yellow Belt
Joined
Feb 10, 2007
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I would like to respond as a woman trained by Tuhan Joseph Arriola and a 4th degree black belt Gura in his school.

In reading through these threads, there are presumptions being made that having differences and disparities between the genders is a bad thing. And perhaps in our egalitarian society we have now made them out to be.

Before becoming a student of Tuhan I had done a few years of judo, then proceeded to look for a Filipino martial arts school. I went around to many schools. Some that preached the equality between men and women in their words, but in the end when you looked at who were the advanced students and who were the better fighters, none of them were women. And though the teachers talked about how "great" the women were, they were essentially lying to them, because they weren't that good and any of the men would have taken them out. And I was friends with the teacher of that school. Sure the men and women did the same exact things, taught the same techniques. But what we fail to recognize is that more often than not, the teacher has a bias to which techniques are taught more often or not at all and usually, and I'm at fault of doing this as well, of only teaching the techqniues that fit our (the teacher's body) whether that be a man or a woman. Thus, what happens is that really everyone is just learning the techniques that fit say a short stocky young man's body. So what happens to the women, the older men, the tall guys. Well, they try to conform, they try really hard to learn these techniques, but will they ever be as good as the person whose body fits them, usually not. And then they'll see that they just can't get any better, so they quit or they move on to the next style hoping to learn more.

Tuhan's style and technique of distinguishing the genders forces everyone to truly examine what each other's strengths and weaknesses really are at any given moment of our lives. What was different from the other schools I had visisted, when I first entered Tuhan's class, was the sheer diversity of those training with students from 10 years old to 50+ years, men and women. This is a style and a school that would be relevant at any point of our lives.

I can say that some of the men of the school would comment on how sometimes Tuhan was often harsher on the women, an expectation to do certain techniques better than the men. Was he being mean? No. He was being real and honest because in reality if we were going to actually defend ourselves, then we did have to be that much better in order to live.

One time he sent me through what I called the gauntlet. He had me spar every single guy in the room one after another. He told them to swing and to swing with everything they had as hard as they could and Tuhan left me out there, made me defend myself. And the words that still ring in my head today that he said, "she has to know. she has to know what a real punch looks like." how fast it really comes.

It's not to say the women never wield the heavy weapons nor that the men never wield the knife. But it's a matter of the responsibility of the teacher to control when a student has the ability and the responsibility to properly handle a weapon. It's not "fair" but it's right! I don't want to die, at least not in a martial arts class because my teacher let someone wield a weapon they couldn't handle in the first place.

When a parent lets their oldest daughter drive at 16 but doesn't let their son drive til he's 18, is that fair? No, not on the surface. But if she's the responsible and mature one and he's the reckless goof, is it fair then? It's certainly to me to the other drivers who have to drive on the road with them!

I was cooking at the stove at 7 using a step stool to reach the burners to cook omelettes. My brother was never allowed to cook without supervision well into his teens. Why? Because he would he would have burned the house down! It's not fair, but it's right!

And I'll tell you right now, there isn't a man in the school who doesn't have the highest respect for the skills of the women in the school. But why is that? Because we start from our strength and build from there. Do we all start from the same square on the board? No and why should we. But in the end, we learn to learn from each other's differences, to understand how each body moves, their strengths their weaknesses and we understand that in our opponents as well. It makes us all better fighters.

In this society we often look to cure our failures, our regrets. All the talk shows are about our problems. And what does it get us? more failures, more problems, more regrets.

So why not begin with our strengths? Why not build on success? It's not to say we only train in what we're good at, but it allows us to understand how to make our weaknesses stronger. We get to see the range of how a technique works. Learn how they fit into each individual body. And each person reveals something different something more to learn.

The other assumption made in threads here is that we are only looking at the individual's progress. But the way in which Tuhan teaches, it's not about me, by differentiating genders, by understanding differences, we all learn ten times as fast because it's not about me, it's about all of us. It's not about how I do a strike, it's about how he strikes and him and him and her and her and him. And I don't see one way, I get to see 10 ways, 20 ways to do the strike.

Tuhan's way of teaching made me a better teacher. As a woman, I have to understand a man's body to teach my male students what they need in order to be better. And sometimes it means teaching them techniques I'm not really fond of or very good at because I'm not 6 ft 200 lbs. We don't start from the same spot, but we eventually grow to learn what the other is good at.

We can argue politics and semantics easy enough in a online board. But if you came and saw it, you wouldn't believe it. You wouldn't believe that that guy there has only 6 months of training and that woman picked up a weapon for the first time last month. People try out one class and they think it's hard. But I think they think it's hard because they've never imagined the full capacity of what they're capable of. Wouldn't you want to know that? Don't you want to see just how far you could really go? But this is not possible to see when we're treated "all the same" and it's not possible when we don't see, acknowledge, understand, and learn our strengths and weaknesses and our differences.

Regards,
Gura Michelle Bautista
Kamatuuran School of Kali
 

Cruentus

Grandmaster
Joined
Apr 17, 2002
Messages
7,161
Reaction score
130
Location
At an OP in view of your house...
The whole thing seems so ridiculus on so many levels to me that I don't know where even to begin.

Rather then waste precious time debunking what I think is a load of, eh, stuff, I'll just say this:

Good luck to you folks out there who enjoy training in that particular system with these particular training philosophies. If it helps you, great; I am happy for you. I just know that it isn't for me. I also know that I am not alone in this. But if it suits you, as long as no one is being hurt by it, then have fun and best wishes.

Take care...
 

jks9199

Administrator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
23,473
Reaction score
3,795
Location
Northern VA
Abraham Lincoln once asked "How many legs...

Wow...lots of critique...lots of flaming. But, no discussion no middle ground. Obviously,you do not want to hear what I have to say. You don't have to read me...

Do you have videos of yourself posted. I posted mine. I'd love to see your method. Truth is not always exhibited in words. A true master, can tell the fighting ability of a warrior simply by the way they move.

In this way, I get to question. Now wouldn't that me fair. No anger, no flaming.
Dude...

That ain't flaming. People have politely, but strongly disagreed with you. If you're going to say that anyone who says something different than you is flaming you, and you're going to decide what is or isn't "discussion" based (I guess) on whether or not they disagree with your views... I don't predict much "discussion" in your future.

I disagree with the idea that women and men should be taught differently, except so far as to recognize differences like size, upper body strength, and clothing issues when you get to practical use of martial arts. I'm old fashioned enough to prefer to see women protect their faces during sparring -- especially younger gals. But I admit that my view is my own bias -- not something special to my art.

Perhaps your mode of teaching is intrinsic to your art and your beliefs; your entitled to do it however you want. And, it is true that modern medicine has highlighted some physiological differences in male and female information processing and neurophysiology (the one probably feeds the other) -- but I just can't agree with your approach of teaching things in radically different order and emphasis based on gender.

Oh well, I guess it works for you and your students...
 

Latest Discussions

Top