What makes people believe absurd conspiracy theories?

Discussion in 'The Locker Room Bar & Grill' started by Chrisinmd, Jan 23, 2021.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. JowGaWolf

    JowGaWolf Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2015
    Messages:
    9,060
    Likes Received:
    2,844
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Live camera feed from space. You have 2 choices. You can believe it or don't. Accept it as proof or don't

     
  2. JowGaWolf

    JowGaWolf Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2015
    Messages:
    9,060
    Likes Received:
    2,844
    Trophy Points:
    263
    According to who? You? There are scientist who have already surpassed them in their own field of study.
     
  3. jobo

    jobo Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2017
    Messages:
    9,274
    Likes Received:
    1,411
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    Manchester UK
    well exactly, yoyr defering to an aurthority figure, in this case nasa, that could be cgi, quite easily, you have noway of knowing if its real or not just that you trust nasa not to lie to you, so belif with out proof, again
     
  4. JowGaWolf

    JowGaWolf Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2015
    Messages:
    9,060
    Likes Received:
    2,844
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Nope. I don't. Just the same way scientist have discovered things in our lifetime only to discover many years later that it's harmful.
     
  5. jobo

    jobo Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2017
    Messages:
    9,274
    Likes Received:
    1,411
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    Manchester UK
    no, who has surpassed neils bohr, he invented quantum mechanics, in fact he "invented "the atomic bomb, before there was even a war,

    he is undoubtedly one of the finest minds there have ever been or likely to be

    the germans tried to recruit him, it may all have turned out cery differently if they had done so

    now be honest, you never heard of him have you ?, these days he nostly only famous have having had a major fall out with einstein
     
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2021
  6. JowGaWolf

    JowGaWolf Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2015
    Messages:
    9,060
    Likes Received:
    2,844
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Steven Weinberg
    Stephen Hawking
    Edward Witten
    Alan Guth
    Peter Higgs
     
  7. jobo

    jobo Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2017
    Messages:
    9,274
    Likes Received:
    1,411
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    Manchester UK
    all great people, in what way have they surpassed neils bohr?, just writing a list of contempary scientists doesnt actually support the point , ut just show youve google scientist

    he is lije einstein and a good few others from the 1910/ 20s, they conpkwly redesignes our understanding of physics, others have built on their work, but could never be said to have surpassed it, unless they to do something original that completly changes our understanding of physics of those higgs is the closest
     
  8. JowGaWolf

    JowGaWolf Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2015
    Messages:
    9,060
    Likes Received:
    2,844
    Trophy Points:
    263
    You got the names. look it up for yourself why take my words? Determine that on your own.

    And yet you still got the names.
     
  9. jobo

    jobo Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2017
    Messages:
    9,274
    Likes Received:
    1,411
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    Manchester UK
    i know their work, ive put a great deal of time in to understanding hawkin radiation and the higgs boson

    you said they had supassed bohr, its up to you to say why you think that is so, not for me to guess your mind
     
  10. JowGaWolf

    JowGaWolf Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2015
    Messages:
    9,060
    Likes Received:
    2,844
    Trophy Points:
    263
    It's not up to me. you are the one hung up on this issue. prove it or disprove it to yourself. Either way works for me
     
  11. jobo

    jobo Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2017
    Messages:
    9,274
    Likes Received:
    1,411
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    Manchester UK
    okok il put it down as you have no idea, that works for me
     
  12. JowGaWolf

    JowGaWolf Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2015
    Messages:
    9,060
    Likes Received:
    2,844
    Trophy Points:
    263
    It's not about me. It's about you.
     
  13. dvcochran

    dvcochran Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2017
    Messages:
    5,820
    Likes Received:
    1,688
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    Southeast U.S.
    I read through the entire thread but chose to respond to this post since it has the most content and seems most relevant. I will say I agree with you... in part. I do fully agree that the manipulation of humans is an intriguing topic but I also strongly feel the word manipulation is misunderstood and unsavory to many people.
    Even the definitions can seem opposing:
    ma·nip·u·la·tion
    /məˌnipyəˈlāSHən/
    noun
    1. 1.
      the action of manipulating something in a skillful manner.
      "the format allows fast picture manipulation"

    2. 2.
      the action of manipulating someone in a clever or unscrupulous way.
      "there was no deliberate manipulation of visitors' emotions"
    In 1.1 the word 'skillful' resonates with me loudly. Sadly so does 'unscrupulous' in 2.2.

    To be certain, you are spouting some higher minded thinking. But you are giving your opinion based on the same conditions you are bashing against; in short, your exposure and experiences.
    That is so common to the point of being blasé.
    Clearly, you are looking at all things from the same perspective. So is that not 'the pot calling the kettle black'?

    Until you, me, or anyone else has proven through their own tangible and reinforced evidence that what they say is worth listening to, it means very little. This is 100% true, 100% of the time. You are basing your perspective on how 'loud' or prevalent these truth's have been presented. Sensationalism and manipulation at it's finest.

    Bear in mind, almost Everything as we know it is in a state of flux. What is true today will quite possibly not be true tomorrow. Use your radiation exposure in the early days as proof positive.

    I truly believe the way information is presented, received, and accessed will change radically in the next 10-20 years; just like it has in the previous equal length of time.

    As an example; your argument that All knowledge should be common knowledge to everyone. How is that at all possible when everything is changing in real time?
    Another example of this is physics (which seems to be what you and @jobo have centered on). Many, many 'concrete' laws in physics have been either disproven or modified. But, my oh my, how many things have been discovered and/or invented based on the physical laws of the current time. Where would we be without them?

    So I will say the same phrase to you that I recently said to @skribs; 'paralysis by analysis' is So true and applicable to your list.
     
  14. jobo

    jobo Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2017
    Messages:
    9,274
    Likes Received:
    1,411
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    Manchester UK
    i came accross a site called" stolen history" which i though would be intresting, as with out doubt popular history has beem exstensivly edited rewriten, to remove some of the less savoury bits,

    however, it reaches a whole new level of crazy, im not sure if im allowed to link?

    the people are dedicated beyond beliefs , they have invested years in there reseach and can pull really obscure historical documents.

    however the net result of this research, is there was a global flood in the early 1800s, this may have been the biblical flood or it may have been a mud flood, there is little consensus, which lead the the death of billions and a complete rewrite of history , there are variations, they also have an obsession with star forts and giants, occasionaly dinosaurs and a particular intrest in siberian forests or the lack there of.

    its both impresive in the amount of research they do and extremly funny and occasionally you learn something, i read the peace treaty from the war of 1812 last night, how many have,done that i wonder

    now if i could only work out what happened to those,Siberian forests
     
  15. JowGaWolf

    JowGaWolf Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2015
    Messages:
    9,060
    Likes Received:
    2,844
    Trophy Points:
    263
    You would be correct on all points here. I myself don't like the term manipulation and when I talk about it, I have to first remind myself not think of it as something as good or bad. There's a lot stuff about manipulation that is hard to stomach. It's like medicine. You know the validity of it, but it's still going to taste like crap.lol.

    To speak from personal experience is common. We all experience this world directly or indirectly. The amount of exposure we have and from which side of that exposure will play a large role in how we understand things.

    We all have perspective even though they may seem similar in some areas it doesn't make it the same. 5555555555 is not the same as 5555555554. No matter how similar it may be in some areas it is still not the same in another.

    In terms of calling the kettle black that will depend on what part. If you are talking about Manipulation, then I'm not calling the kettle black. No one can live on this planet without manipulating someone in one direction or the other. If you have kids, then you know you do it often, but probably don't refer to it as manipulation because it comes with that negative imagery.

    If you are talking about me soaking my brain in only one perspective. I don't do that. You may have heard me say many times that I always try to keep balance. So if I find myself not willing to listen to other perspective or at the very minimum hear other perspectives then I know that at that point I'm not in balance. I'm a news junkie but when I feel like I'm hearing the same thing over and over on a perspective, then I will turn the news off and not watch it for a few weeks. It doesn't matter which news channel does this. That's just me.

    I have discovered that my mind is more steady when I know which perspectives are out there. I don't need to know all of them. I just need to nor more than my own and I can't personally define those other perspectives. So for me. I will ask you about your perspective vs trying to tell you how you are without first asking you to share your perspective.

    Actually I haven't said anything much about what is true and what isn't true. I pretty much left it open for others to make their own assumptions about what I stated. I could be wrong, but I don't think I mentioned the word true or truth in anywhere.
    I was already aware of the behavior of people who lie and which type of people use this strategy of lying and brain washing. Dictators, Cult Leaders, Parents, Marketers, Politicians. This is why I always have to get into the correct mindset when talking about Manipulation

    Everything we know is not in a state of flux. I will be a black American regardless if I wake up tomorrow or not. I could wake up dismembered and that would never change that truth. You have to look at the context of which I made my statement about radiation. It doesn't apply to everything. It just applies to somethings, specifically about the topic or radiation as there has been a history of humans not fully understanding radiation. There are a lot of things that I wouldn't apply that line of thinking to.

    The problem with applying it to everything is that it also applies to what you think will be true. That means that what you think is untrue today will eventually proven true. But apply that same rule again, and the truth of that comes tomorrow will also be proven untrue. If you continue that cycle then nothing is true because the future will ultimately prove that it's untrue.

    I believe this as well. The fact that we are communicating the way that we are speaks volumes.

    Not sure if that's my argument. If I were to make an argument along the lines of that it would be "History Repeats itself." "All life is a pattern and by understanding the pattern, we can understand the things to come." We watch Jobo prey upon patterns all the time. We usually refer to it as "stirring the pot" or "pushing buttons" but it's nothing but pattern recognition. Jobo recognizes the patters and behaviors and then exploits them. Which is again Manipulation.

    yeah that's Jobo in Manipulation mode with that coversation We were originally talking about radiation and test subjects to see how long cancer would grow. to Physics and Quantum theories and scientist who are the smartest that the world has ever seen. While totally ignoring the fact that science has created things and accomplish things that scientist in the past were unable to do. I just didn't feel like getting into with Jobo on that today. Then I'm called a scientist of Google. not sure what that mean. Nothing wrong with looking up names. None of that changed my perception that the scientist of today are more knowledgeable than those of the past, evident by how many things exist today that didn't exist in 1938. So naming someone who is "better" just doesn't matter.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  16. JowGaWolf

    JowGaWolf Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2015
    Messages:
    9,060
    Likes Received:
    2,844
    Trophy Points:
    263
    When things get way out there you have to start looking at the historical documents that they claim to be using.
    The flood that you are talking about is something popular among religions that believe that the earth is only 2020 years old . Where year zero is the beginning of the earth. Some guy years ago tried to hand me a brochure. He was part of a homeschool group and was mad that the movie we showed said that water is millions of years old and that it's the same water that dinosaurs were drinking. That set him off. After the tour he singled me out and gave his rant about how humans and dinosaurs lived together and that I needed Jesus, and I should go to the church in the brochure that he handed me. There haven't been many days stranger than that. Not sure why he focused on me, but damn. I will forever remember that it happened lol.

    According other sources there have been multiple great floods that have occurred in various places. They have found multiple documents from many places in the world about a big flood. The only thing is that these documents were not created during the same time period, nor did the flooding happen in the same part of the world.

    I've read many treaties in highschool history. I hated every minute of it. I didn't score high on those test either. So I've read treaties but couldn't tell you much about them. I can't even say that I would enjoy reading them now.
     
  17. JowGaWolf

    JowGaWolf Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2015
    Messages:
    9,060
    Likes Received:
    2,844
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Actually I haven't done much analysis on it. I just pointed out a pattern and recognize that it's similar to what other people and leaders have done. In other words it follows the same or similar rule sets and beliefs.

    I will usually post tons of links when I'm in my analysis mode.
     
  18. jobo

    jobo Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2017
    Messages:
    9,274
    Likes Received:
    1,411
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    Manchester UK
    true scietific genius, that original thought that changes the whole way we virw,science/ the world/ the universe comes around about every 200 years or so, so every 10 generations or so we get one genius

    in the early 1900s we had half a dozen of them at the same time, a really bizare cluster of genius,,,, thats why there has beem a dramatic increace in the rate of technological exspantion, these are people who were born before the invention of the internal conbustion engine who saw us through atomic power and though to the moon landing, all the micro electronics and computers ate down to the original work they did in cica 1920, all those that have come since have refined and redirected the original thought they did, with out themselves being greatly original.

    even now the next generation of computing is dependent on what they did, way back then,there is enough there to keep us progressibg till the next original genius comes along, about 2070 should do it
     
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2021
    • Like Like x 1
  19. dvcochran

    dvcochran Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2017
    Messages:
    5,820
    Likes Received:
    1,688
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    Southeast U.S.
    That was in an era of HUGE leaps in technology, which I do not think can be ignored. For example, look at the 300 years prior. Boring by comparison. I wonder if/when it will happen again, if ever. I do not see it happening in our lifetime.
    Sadly, I am very concerned we are headed towards another world war in our lifetime.
    This new regime in the US is scary as hell and it hasn’t even been a week.
    Liberalism hard at work.
     
  20. jobo

    jobo Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2017
    Messages:
    9,274
    Likes Received:
    1,411
    Trophy Points:
    263
    Location:
    Manchester UK
    i dont disagree, but i dont want the thread shutting down by straying into contempary history, ,i have a really bad feeling that society has changed for the worse over the last few months ,123
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page