Tae kwon do vs. Kung Fu

Discussion in 'General Martial Arts Talk' started by goof321, May 13, 2008.

  1. goof321

    goof321 Yellow Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2007
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    wich one do u prefer and why? i actually cant decide between either of them but id like to hear youre opinions to decide wich one to practice
     
  2. terryl965

    terryl965 <center><font size="2"><B>Martial Talk Ultimate<BR

    • MartialTalk Fan
    • Martial Talk Alumni
    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    41,261
    Likes Received:
    329
    Trophy Points:
    193
    Location:
    Grand Prairie Texas
    Well I am bias at best since I have been doing TKD for 25 years, I guess it is the Art and all the SD principle that is involved thoughout the style. Before TKD it was Okinwa Karate and they seem to mix pretty well together.
     
  3. exile

    exile To him unconquered.

    • Supporting Member
    • MartialTalk Fan
    • LifeTime Supporting Member
    • Martial Talk Alumni
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    10,669
    Likes Received:
    244
    Trophy Points:
    173
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio
    I think that's pretty much what you're going to find&#8212;the TKD people will prefer TKD and the CMA people will prefer the CMA that they do. And I'm willing to bet that if you ask someone who does both of them (there must be at least a few such on the board), mostly you'll hear that they're both good.:D
     
  4. Xue Sheng

    Xue Sheng Sr. Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Messages:
    20,865
    Likes Received:
    951
    Trophy Points:
    248
    Location:
    a particular place or position
    I agree with what has been posted here so far but I need to clarify one thing

    TKD is Tae Kwon Do

    Kung Fu is Pick One

    And that is only a partial list
     
  5. exile

    exile To him unconquered.

    • Supporting Member
    • MartialTalk Fan
    • LifeTime Supporting Member
    • Martial Talk Alumni
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    10,669
    Likes Received:
    244
    Trophy Points:
    173
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio
    I've seen that list before somewhere, XS. And it seems like you could spend a lifetime just learning the names of the various CMA styles, let alone learning one of the styles itself!

    To me, that's great, one of the terrific things about the CMAs. You have to be glad there was no central CMA directorate a few hundred years back stamping out all the variants to produce a monoclonal one-size-fits-all product...
     
  6. HG1

    HG1 Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2006
    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Check out as many schools as possible & find the best match for you. Both systems have good & bad schools so you will have to sort them out.
     
  7. Xue Sheng

    Xue Sheng Sr. Grandmaster

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Messages:
    20,865
    Likes Received:
    951
    Trophy Points:
    248
    Location:
    a particular place or position
    Not wishing to hijack the post but yes... and no.

    The variety is mighty cool and looking at things form different perspectives is good but I can do without the politics, lineage fights and true, secret, direct, fake transmissions.

    But I do love the CMA styles so I guess more yes than no
     
  8. Deaf Smith

    Deaf Smith Master of Arts

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,722
    Likes Received:
    85
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Honestly, I find the practitioner needs to see what art fits their physical and physological abilities.

    Long time ago, Master Chu told us that Kung Fu masters were very very good (Chu was 7 dan Tang So Do and 8th dan Tae Kwon Do himself.) He also said it took 10 years to get a 'black belt', if that's the term, in Kung Fu. He said the motions they used were not natural and thus took alot of time to prefect.

    Still, to me the style reflects the inner person. I prefer striking (heaven know what a shrink would interpet that) and lots of physical activity. Others might find more subtile methods to their liking or grappling or methods that flow and are artistic.

    So I really don't care about TKD .vs. KF or SBD .vs. JuJitsu or ishen ryu .vs. Muy Thai, etc....

    There are outstanding pratictioners in every art that I wouldn't want to mess with!
     
  9. Steel Tiger

    Steel Tiger Senior Master

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,412
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    108
    Location:
    Canberra, Australia
    I have to agree with XS on this. The variety of CMA is a great attraction for me. Even though I have only briefly dabbled in JKD and have trained extensively in bagua I still have a sense of variety. It may be the nature of the internal arts or it may simply be the interconnectedness of the CMAs, but studying even a single style as I do you get a variety of areas into which to develop. We have striking techniques (hands and feet), grappling techniques, movement strategies, weapons training, and qigong training. Even staying within the one style one can specialise in one of these subsets.

    One of the impressions I get of TKD is a lack of that variety. Furthermore, I get an impression that it was probably once there, but the art has been paired down to an efficient minimum. That's fine, but it limits the areas one can specialise in within the art.

    One area in which TKD and the CMAs are very similar is politicking and lineage fighting. But in this TKD has the advantage of actually having many living founders, the CMAs cannot really make this boast as most newly developed styles have been built on the shoulders of long dead giants. As a result lineage disputes can be monumental, take a look at Yang taiji for an example.

    But, like XS, I think that the good outweighs the bad.
     
  10. snoack

    snoack Yellow Belt

    Joined:
    May 12, 2008
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    8
    I don't know much about Kung Fu, so I really can't speak to it. I've been into TKD for 4 years now, and I do like the simplicty with which the art is constructed (simple to me, anyway. A series of stances and positions upon which everything is built). Not so much a tremendous amount of movement and technique, but more of a focus on how to combine these movements and techniques into different patterns and series. On top of that, to echo what somebody else said, the SD component is nice as well.
     
  11. Marginal

    Marginal Senior Master

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2002
    Messages:
    3,277
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    108
    Location:
    Colorado
    That's until you get into the politics etc. Then you get people practicing the exact same style right down the pre class warmup sessions telling you you're not doing "true TKD" etc, not to mention the various spins the numerous Kwans have put on TKD from one to the next. At that point it seems just as pissy as the next art. :high5:
     
  12. arnisador

    arnisador Sr. Grandmaster

    • Martial Talk Alumni
    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    44,463
    Likes Received:
    385
    Trophy Points:
    193
    Location:
    Terre Haute, IN
    It depends on so many things--your body type and movement style, what you want out of the martial arts, etc. Both can work! Try some schools.

    As mentioned, while TKD orgs. vary, kung fu really covers a lot of territory. Northern and Southern styles can feel quite different, for example.
     
  13. zDom

    zDom Senior Master

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,081
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    108
    I would prefer to train TKD and watch Kung Fu movies :)
     
  14. Tames D

    Tames D RECKLESS

    • Supporting Member
    • Martial Talk Alumni
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Messages:
    3,437
    Likes Received:
    203
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Location:
    Southern California
    I would prefer to train Kung Fu and watch TKD in the Olympics [​IMG].
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. IcemanSK

    IcemanSK El Conquistador nim!

    • MartialTalk Fan
    • MartialTalk Mentor
    • Martial Talk Alumni
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    6,351
    Likes Received:
    124
    Trophy Points:
    173
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA


    Really? Huh? I guess there's something for everyone:lol:
     
  16. still learning

    still learning Senior Master

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    3,749
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    158
    Hello, If comparing art to art....both are excellant for what they do!

    When two arts complete against each other? ...than it is the person who makes the art win. NOT the style of the art.

    Most times the better skill person, one with more cardio, will have the advantage....Aloha

    PS: A street fighter with more cardio...in a real fight will have the advantage..
     
  17. SageGhost83

    SageGhost83 Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2007
    Messages:
    454
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Virginia
    Amen, still learning!
     
  18. 14 Kempo

    14 Kempo Grandmaster

    • MartialTalk Fan
    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2006
    Messages:
    9,698
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    158
    Location:
    San Diego, California
    Which is better? It's all a matter of skill and movement. Distance comes into play as well. Just about every art has its most desirable distance, find it and you have the advantage. Both arts mentioned here will give you an intense workout, and self defense skills.
    Most important in a decision such as this is the school and the instructor. Both arts have their good and bad, the instructor is going to be the most important aspect. There are great martial artists that can't teach and great teachers that aren't so good at martial arts. Check out the classes, have a list of questions for the instructor. Talk to other students.

    Good luck!
     
  19. Hawke

    Hawke Master Black Belt

    • MartialTalk Fan
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,069
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Between TKD and CMA which has the better instructor?

    Which will you go train more often?

    Go visit the local training halls.

    If possible go visit as many training halls in other styles as well.

    You may be surprised with the quality of the instructor and the art itself.
     
  20. chinto

    chinto Senior Master

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2007
    Messages:
    2,017
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    108
    If I had to choose which to train in, I would choose Kung fu in say choy li fat or crane or one other of the many good combat effective systems. I would not choose Tae Kwan do because so many of the schools for that styel are not teaching it as a combat efficient and effective system aimed at self defense and survival. Most seem to be teaching it for Olimpic competition. and in my opinion good judo schools teach better for the street then most of the sport tkd types seem to. ( at dan level the good judo schools teach basically all the stuff that was taken out so you learn the old school Japanese jujitsu techniques and strikes and things that were removed for safety.)
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

combat kung fu system

,

kung fu vs taekwondo which is better