jobo
Grandmaster
the whole stratergy has been around people not wanting to get blamed rather than any practcle consideration of the risks,, points ive made several times before to a hostile receptionI think far more people have had the disease than we know. This is from the antibody testings and from times when they test everyone and find the majority of those with the disease are asymptotic.
I think the disease was here before it was confirmed to have been, and it only made headlines when it swept through nursing homes. I think a lot of people have had it already and don't even know it.
I think the fears of the disease have waned a lot in response to the BLM protests. My governor won't let churches reopen because safety trumps the first amendment, but he's fine with the protests because we can't interfere with their first amendment rights.
My cousin in another state has documentation from his state that barbecues are limited to gatherings of 5, but protests to gatherings of 100.
The more data that comes out, the less these measures make sense. Some states have reopened without spikes in hospitalization. There's more and more data of people having mild or asymptotic cases of the disease, since we've expanded tests beyond those that require hospitalization.
More and more, what is and isn't allowed is based on political opinions. In Europe, brothels are opening before martial arts schools. Why? Is that a safe activity with a virus? Why are the first amendment rights of protestors more important than the first amendment rights of churches?
It's political. It's all political. If you think it isn't, you've fallen prey.
protests are ok, because they cant actually stop them any more than they can stop the sex trade. So make them legal so that they dont loose face with people just ignoring them
the more you abide by the stupid rules the longer those rules will be in place and the dafter they will get