Stick VRS Knife

TallAdam85

3rd Black Belt
Joined
May 23, 2003
Messages
975
Reaction score
3
Location
Washington, Michigan
Ok people if you where getting attacket by a man or gang what would you like to have a knife or a stick? and your reason for it
 
OP
TallAdam85

TallAdam85

3rd Black Belt
Joined
May 23, 2003
Messages
975
Reaction score
3
Location
Washington, Michigan
If I was getting attacted I would have to say a stick just because it is easyer to hit and not get to close. + I just like using them or a stick better then knifes just like the feel of them.
 
X

XxSweetFacadexX

Guest
i would rather have both with me... but i would prefer to use the stick. same reason as you. i like the feel and the distance... but if it really does come a bit too close for comfort, as a last resort, i would take the knife out... last resort.

i would rather knock a person into a coma instead of outright killing them...
 
P

progressivetactics

Guest
stick.
more comfortable with my ability with a stick, and feel better about the mame vs kill idea.
 
X

XxSweetFacadexX

Guest
also... at least with a stick, you can get it back if it is disarmed... you can take more hits with it... and it can't exactly be used against you...
 
M

Master of Blades

Guest
Originally posted by XxSweetFacadexX
i would rather have both with me... but i would prefer to use the stick. same reason as you. i like the feel and the distance... but if it really does come a bit too close for comfort, as a last resort, i would take the knife out... last resort.

i would rather knock a person into a coma instead of outright killing them...


Exactly what I was gonna say :D
 

OULobo

Senior Master
MTS Alumni
Joined
Jun 20, 2003
Messages
2,139
Reaction score
33
Location
Cleveland, OH
As anyone who spars knows, range is a very useful advantage. In an open air melee I think a big stick works best. There is usually something long and hard around that you can improvise into a striking weapon :shrug: . Its hard to cut someone who you can't reach with out catching a shot to the head.

Indoors or in a confine, a knife is quick, concealable and deadly. might be a better choice.

Now a days, why bother with either and just go for the glock 19. Not so cheap, but reliable, accessable and you can't beat the range. :D
 
K

krys

Guest
Definitely a stick....
better if it is a bahi or kamagong..................

with hardwood chances are that you'll disable-kill-knock down an opponent with one strike which is not always the case with a knive......

given the choice I prefer to be able to strike an opponent in a distance where he can't...

besides with many opponents you don't want to go into close quarters.....
 

Kalicombat

Green Belt
Joined
Mar 14, 2002
Messages
168
Reaction score
3
Location
Sinton, Texas
For me, definetly a knife. If I am attacked, the attackers intentions can not be very pleasant. I would want the knife because it will Stop an attacker more readily then just pissing him off.

Gary Catherman.
 

arnisandyz

Master Black Belt
Joined
Feb 22, 2002
Messages
1,346
Reaction score
37
Location
Melbourne, Florida
You think this is how some systems of espada y daga came about? A method of covering both ranges? using a long range weapon for just that, then using the knife as back up in case an opponent gets past the first layer of defense? I have seen long and short styles that emphasis the long range more (the knife is used primarily from long range to cut limbs or as a back up) and the opposite, where the stick is used for entering to set up the kill shot from the knife. I have heard others say that this is the highest form of eskrima since it covers the ranges very well.

Andy
 

Datu Tim Hartman

Senior Master
Founding Member
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Aug 26, 2001
Messages
2,236
Reaction score
116
Location
Buffalo, NY USA
Originally posted by arnisandyz
You think this is how some systems of espada y daga came about?

I think it was the Filipinos copying the Spaniards during thier occupation.

:asian:
 

arnisandyz

Master Black Belt
Joined
Feb 22, 2002
Messages
1,346
Reaction score
37
Location
Melbourne, Florida
Originally posted by Renegade
I think it was the Filipinos copying the Spaniards during thier occupation.

:asian:

I think there were methods of long and short before the spaniards occupied, may not have been called espada y daga, but how about a whip and knife or a spear and shield. Bolo and knife. Bow and arrow, knife, etc. Don't know how accurate it is but Dan Inosanto also made reference to the sword being supported by the jabong (sai) which came from Indonesia . I guess nobody knows, but just seems logical (as others have posted as well) to have a backup or support to a long range weapon. I can't imagine someone in the PI not thinking of picking up a stick/sword and a knife up at the same time until they decided to "copy" it from someone. I'd give our forefathers the benefit of the doubt.
 

Datu Tim Hartman

Senior Master
Founding Member
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Aug 26, 2001
Messages
2,236
Reaction score
116
Location
Buffalo, NY USA
Seeing that the Spaniads occupied the PI for about 400 years you would think that both cultures would influence each other. As per your comment I was only reffering to sword and dagger. This particular fighting style was well established in europe.

:asian:
 

Latest Discussions

Top