"Sharia law in UK is 'unavoidable'"??????????

Archangel M

Senior Master
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
4,555
Reaction score
154
What determines which religious group gets way and which one doesnt? How is it fair if tow people have similar legal issues but get different legal treatment based on their religion? This is a horrible idea. What happened to "equal protection under law"?
 

CoryKS

Senior Master
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
4,403
Reaction score
183
Location
Olathe, KS
I would have no problem with this if it were something along the lines of a small claims court where both sides have agreed to the venue. Once you have broken the law, however, your *** goes before a real judge in a real court. IMO.
 
OP
Doc_Jude

Doc_Jude

3rd Black Belt
Joined
Jul 5, 2007
Messages
916
Reaction score
36
Location
Southern Kalifornia
I would have no problem with this if it were something along the lines of a small claims court where both sides have agreed to the venue. Once you have broken the law, however, your *** goes before a real judge in a real court. IMO.

I think that this is the situation, but it's really going to have an impact on English law. I'm not looking forward to seeing the results if they do implement this.
 

Kacey

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
16,462
Reaction score
227
Location
Denver, CO
If you move to a country, you need to follow the laws of the country, or change them for everyone through the legal process. It's one thing to have religious laws that you choose to follow above and beyond the laws of the land; it's something else - something I find discriminatory at best - to have different laws for different groups... that way lies significant social problems.
 

CoryKS

Senior Master
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
4,403
Reaction score
183
Location
Olathe, KS
Interesting, but slightly offtopic: Drudge is reporting that one of the major proponents of sharia law in the UK, Abu Hamza al-Masri (aka Cap'n Hook), will be extradited to the US on terror charges.
 

Carol

Crazy like a...
MT Mentor
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
20,311
Reaction score
541
Location
NH
What about the rights of Muslims that have fled to places like the UK to escape Sharia law?
 

Sukerkin

Have the courage to speak softly
MT Mentor
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
15,325
Reaction score
493
Location
Staffordshire, England
That's a good point there, Carol that had not occurred to me when I read this article.

I was busy thinking of the legal ramifications of allowing such a divisive split in how issues are handled. I also have to admit that I had a middle-aged reactionary moment too where I was thinking "If you don't want to abide by our laws then go live somewhere else!".

I had a couple of other mental meaders as well (such as pondered the woolly, overly-liberal, thinking that gets us into these messes) and I never considered that there may well be people living here that emigrated to get away from some of the more draconian elements of Sharia.
 
OP
Doc_Jude

Doc_Jude

3rd Black Belt
Joined
Jul 5, 2007
Messages
916
Reaction score
36
Location
Southern Kalifornia
I was busy thinking of the legal ramifications of allowing such a divisive split in how issues are handled. I also have to admit that I had a middle-aged reactionary moment too where I was thinking "If you don't want to abide by our laws then go live somewhere else!".

Ah, the law issue is striking closer to home now, isn't it!?! We Americans aren't so crazy :uhohh:

Seriously, though, I'm scared for you, brother.
 

Sukerkin

Have the courage to speak softly
MT Mentor
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
15,325
Reaction score
493
Location
Staffordshire, England
It'll be interesting, in more ways than one, to see how this moves forward, Doc.

It may well be that it wont move forward at all as the various churches have spoken out on certain issues over the years without any noticeable sign of anything changing.

If it does tho' I think that it will cause a lot more ill-feeling between cultural sub-groupings than would be provoked ensuring that the English law is enforced regardless of colour or creed.

This is especially so in some parts of the country where, without wanting to sound like an alarmist White Supremacist, some people are starting to feel like exiles in their own land.
 

CoryKS

Senior Master
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
4,403
Reaction score
183
Location
Olathe, KS
What about the rights of Muslims that have fled to places like the UK to escape Sharia law?

I believe this was a point that was made when Canada was considering allowing an alternative sharia court. Muslim women, in particular, were rightfully concerned about how this would affect their rights, and were sceptical about how 'voluntary' this system would really be if their relatives coerced them into using it.
 

Steel Tiger

Senior Master
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
2,412
Reaction score
77
Location
Canberra, Australia
First let me say these statements were made by the Archbishop of Canterbury, who, while a respected and intelligent man, is not involved in legislature or the forming thereof.

Further he appears to be comparing the introduction of aspects of Sharia Law to the Jewish Beth Din. This is where I see two problems. Firstly, you will never be able to introduce pieces of Sharia Law, those who are proponents of this form of legal system will want all of it to apply. And secondly, the Beth Din applies to Jewish people only, as far as I can tell (may someone with better knowledge can clue me in). Under Sharia Law non-Muslim people are given a legal status (usually lesser than actual Muslims) so that the law can apply to all people in a community.

I think that Dr Williams is not really considering the reality of what he is suggesting. What he suggests conjures for me images of what is happening in Malaysia where Sharia Law now operates in parallel with proper state law. Non-Muslims are being prosecuted for ludicruous things (A Chinese couple were prosecuted for kissing in public, for instance) in a court they don't want and did not ask for. The Sharia court even has its own thugs, sorry officers, who roam about Kuala Lumpur looking for Muslims commiting crimes. They are not empowered by the state, and therefore not by the people, so under what authority do they act? "The Imam said we could," just doesn't work for me.

When are people going to stop kowtowing to aggressive and vocla minorities in society and just get on with legislating for everybody?

When are people going to learn the value of separation of Church and State? Religion has its place but it is not in legislature.
 

grydth

Senior Master
Joined
Jan 13, 2007
Messages
2,464
Reaction score
150
Location
Upstate New York.
What the UK does is the UK's business, not mine.

Presuming a more general issue of whether Sharia law is, or should be, applicable in the USA..... to me, something is not evil simply because it hales from an Islamic background. Would we have the epidemic of child molestation we do if felons knew they'd face that remedy instead of revolving door/ sob for the criminals 'justice"? Well, they don't offend more than once, do they?

But is Sharia amenable to incorporation into the American legal system? Probably not.

Legal systems aren't ethnic restaurants, you can't have a variety and then pick and choose. There can be but one judicial system, what with "Equal protection" and all. One suspects a fundamental collision with basic precepts of American law.... much as I'd like to see pederasts face Islamic sanctions, I'm betting the 8th Amendment says, "No". American women would never accept - nor should they - the drastic limits imposed upon women in Islamic nations. I doubt Americans would cotton much to reporters being sentenced to death for religious offenses as we see in Afganistan..... I'm not thinking many of the media would be left standing by Sharia rules (Hey, now wait a minute....)

Sorry, but if you come to the USA, you need to abide by our laws.
 

Sukerkin

Have the courage to speak softly
MT Mentor
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
15,325
Reaction score
493
Location
Staffordshire, England
And your last words there are exactly as it should be.

Why we over in the UK don't take the same tack as any other sensible nation on the matter of people coming to live on our soil adpating to us rather than the other way round I cannot fathom.

It will all end in tears one day if we don't sort it out.
 

Steel Tiger

Senior Master
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
2,412
Reaction score
77
Location
Canberra, Australia
Legal systems aren't ethnic restaurants, you can't have a variety and then pick and choose. There can be but one judicial system, what with "Equal protection" and all. One suspects a fundamental collision with basic precepts of American law.... much as I'd like to see pederasts face Islamic sanctions, I'm betting the 8th Amendment says, "No". American women would never accept - nor should they - the drastic limits imposed upon women in Islamic nations. I doubt Americans would cotton much to reporters being sentenced to death for religious offenses as we see in Afganistan..... I'm not thinking many of the media would be left standing by Sharia rules (Hey, now wait a minute....)

Sorry, but if you come to the USA, you need to abide by our laws.

Exactly!

Religious tolerance is one thing, but this strays into a whole other area.
 

CanuckMA

Master of Arts
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
1,726
Reaction score
57
Location
Toronto
Further he appears to be comparing the introduction of aspects of Sharia Law to the Jewish Beth Din. This is where I see two problems. Firstly, you will never be able to introduce pieces of Sharia Law, those who are proponents of this form of legal system will want all of it to apply. And secondly, the Beth Din applies to Jewish people only, as far as I can tell (may someone with better knowledge can clue me in). Under Sharia Law non-Muslim people are given a legal status (usually lesser than actual Muslims) so that the law can apply to all people in a community.

True. And in places where Bet Dins are operating at the level of a civil court, it only adjucates civil matters, and only when both parties agree to have the case heard by the Bet Din. The agreement and the judgement is then legally binding.
 

tellner

Senior Master
Joined
Nov 18, 2005
Messages
4,379
Reaction score
240
Location
Orygun
Well, now we have proof positive that the old Upper Class British tradition of sending the family dimwit into the clergy is still alive and well. The essence of Enlightenment civilization is the rule of Law and one Law for all.
 

Cirdan

Senior Master
Joined
Jan 31, 2006
Messages
2,494
Reaction score
441
Location
Oslo, Norway
Next time I get accused of murder I am going to claim "temporarily religious"
 

Carol

Crazy like a...
MT Mentor
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
20,311
Reaction score
541
Location
NH
Hmmm...that could work

Not Guilty By Reason of Piousity.
 

Tez3

Sr. Grandmaster
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
27,608
Reaction score
4,901
Location
England
Firstly no one actually takes any notice of the Archbishop of Canterbury lol not even the Chirch of England parishioners.Tellner right about him!
The Beth Din in the UK only affects Orthodox Jews not the Chasidic, Reform, Liberal Reform, Lubavitch etc
The Home Secretary and politicians from all sides of the house have said it will not happen and it's not acceptable here.
Just as an interesting side note both British and American law have derived from Judaic law.
 

Latest Discussions

Top