Proof Found of the Red Sea Crossing

[grumpywolfman]

[video=youtube_share;vaN2acVMGC8]http://youtu.be/vaN2acVMGC8[/video]

PeaceWithGod.net

 

[grumpywolfman]

...

 

[The Last Legionary]

1:

4.8 "Bumping" Threads:


No senseless "bumping" of threads. If your thread has merit, then it will stay at the top on its own.

Please do not bump your request/help searching or other threads several times a day. Bumping can refer to posting useless information, making corrections or updates in a new post, posting one-liners or any other action to deliberately keep a thread hot or to bring it to the top of its forum.

Moderators will use their discretion, depending on the nature of the post, as to whether to take action or not. Remember there are people who don't browse this board every hour. So do not bump a thread within 24 hours or too much even after 24 hours.

2:

 

[elder999]

...

The Hebrew words for the crossing are Yand Sumph, not "Red Sea," but Sea of Reeds.....the geography of Exodus (fleeing the city of Ramesses, to Succoth and to Phi hariaoth) doesn't put them anywhere near the "Red Sea," nor do their subsequent journeys after crossing, but they do put them near several salty marshes, which would have mired any chariots they were being chased with, and permitted them to escape being slain by Pharaohto prevent them from spreading the plague that he likely thought they were carrying.....

 

[grumpywolfman]

The Hebrew words for the crossing are Yand Sumph, not "Red Sea," but Sea of Reeds.....the geography of Exodus (fleeing the city of Ramesses, to Succoth and to Phi hariaoth) doesn't put them anywhere near the "Red Sea," nor do their subsequent journeys after crossing, but they do put them near several salty marshes, which would have mired any chariots they were being chased with, and permitted them to escape being slain by Pharaohto prevent them from spreading the plague that he likely thought they were carrying.....

You are correct in that the traditional interpretation of the "Red Sea" is wrong. Ron Wyatt knew this too, and carefully examined the Biblical account to what it would have meant to the people of that time. The correct translation led Ron Wyatt to the exact location described in the Bible, where he found Solomon's markers for the "Red Sea" crossing on both sides! Both the Saudi and Egyptian governments acknowledge the authenticity of the pillars. The dive team found coral covered chariot remains and human bones under the water along the length of the crossing! If you haven't already, please take the time to watch the video, I think you'll find it very interesting ~ thank you.

 

[arnisador]

Chariots and remains would be consistent with many, many possible events.

 

[Bob Hubbard]

Did the Egyptians ever note the loss of a large army? If so, under what circumstances?

 

[elder999]

Did the Egyptians ever note the loss of a large army? If so, under what circumstances?

Ramses II, thought to be the pharaoh of Exodus, lost a division (of chariots!!) to the Hittites at the battle of Kadesh (in what would become modern-day Syria) around 1274 BC, pretty much because of a tactical error on his part. Otherwise, he did pretty well militarily, politically, socially and economically for Egypt...at least, that's what history says (except, the Bible....:lfao: )

 

[Bob Hubbard]

Ramses II, thought to be the pharaoh of Exodus, lost a division (of chariots!!) to the Hittites at the battle of Kadesh (in what would become modern-day Syria) around 1274 BC, pretty much because of a tactical error on his part. Otherwise, he did pretty well militarily, politically, socially and economically for Egypt...at least, that's what history says (except, the Bible....:lfao: )

But didn't he return home and document how he single handedly defeated the enemy?

 

[CanuckMA]

You are correct in that the traditional interpretation of the "Red Sea" is wrong. Ron Wyatt knew this too, and carefully examined the Biblical account to what it would have meant to the people of that time. The correct translation led Ron Wyatt to the exact location described in the Bible, where he found Solomon's markers for the "Red Sea" crossing on both sides! Both the Saudi and Egyptian governments acknowledge the authenticity of the pillars. The dive team found coral covered chariot remains and human bones under the water along the length of the crossing! If you haven't already, please take the time to watch the video, I think you'll find it very interesting ~ thank you.

And Wyatt bases that on 1 Kings 9:26, which does not even come close to talking about the Exodus.

1 Kings 9:26 "26 And king Solomon made a navy of ships in Ezion-geber, which is beside Eloth, on the shore of the Red Sea, in the land of Edom."


The crossing described in Exodus is the crossing from Egypt to the Sinai peninsula. Oy man, you need to find better scholars.

 

[grumpywolfman]

And Wyatt bases that on 1 Kings 9:26, which does not even come close to talking about the Exodus.

1 Kings 9:26 "26 And king Solomon made a navy of ships in Ezion-geber, which is beside Eloth, on the shore of the Red Sea, in the land of Edom."


The crossing described in Exodus is the crossing from Egypt to the Sinai peninsula. Oy man, you need to find better scholars.

There was much more detail of the Biblical account that was used to find the true crossing. Below I have uploaded the original film produced that includes more of the Biblical record. The video that I originally posted is more of an overview of the discovery with less in depth study of the scriptures. I wanted to try and get to the archaeological sites as quickly as possible for anybody who was actually willing to watch. Thank you for your interest in this amazing discovery, I hope that you will enjoy this next video:

 

[CanuckMA]

Guy's a kook and a fraud, discredited by all, even his own church.

 

[grumpywolfman]

I found an excellent peer-review video that I think you will enjoy. They used underwater robotic cameras which revealed the remains of the chariots across the length of the crossing. The whole documentary is awesome, but if you just want to see the underwater footage fast forward to the last twenty minutes.

[video=youtube_share;CXf2IDS-9g0]http://youtu.be/CXf2IDS-9g0[/video]

 

[Cyriacus]

Ill just leave this here.

Sometimes a cigar, is just a cigar.

 

[punisher73]

Yet there are other theories that it was NOT Ramses II that Moses and the Hebrews escaped Egypt from. James Cameron did a documentary on the Exodus (The Exodus Decoded) and it pointed to a much earlier pharoah and a volcanic eruption that would have caused the plauges of egypt and even documented the volcanic eruption in Cambodia that mimicked the plagues and how only the first born child would have been killed due to gases.

Here is a description of the documentary:

Complex yet utterly compelling, The Exodus Decoded is presented by movie
director James Cameron (Titanic) but is the passion of Jewish-Canadian
filmmaker Simcha Jacobovici. Jacobovici has extensively researched evidence that
the Biblical account of the Exodus was real, and concludes that it actually took
place in 1500 BCE (during the reign of pharaoh Ahmos I), historically known as
the Hyksos Expulsion. The Hyksos people were a Semitic race about whom little is
known. But their departure from Egypt, following a long enslavement, along with
early writings and other physical evidence, make a strong case that they are the
Hebrews of lore. Jacobovici suggests the Exodus is also connected to the
catastrophic eruption of the Santorini volcano, which ended the Minoan
civilization and triggered a limnic eruption (a surge of carbon dioxide) in the
Nile river delta. The latter would have killed the river's fish but likely
chased out all the frogs, a phenomenon that could have been considered one of
the famous plagues in the Exodus story. (Jacobovici makes a case for the other
so-called plagues also being a consequence of the eruption.) Whatever one's
opinion of The Exodus Decoded as a historical documentary, it is
engrossing viewing, shot in some truly exotic locations, often under the highly
suspicious eye of Egyptian authorities. Several moments--such as the revelation
of a Hyksos slave's rock carving, pleading with God to be rescued--are
astonishing. --Tom Keogh

 

[Daniel Sullivan]

[video=youtube_share;vaN2acVMGC8]http://youtu.be/vaN2acVMGC8[/video]

PeaceWithGod.net

A stand alone video with a bump. What is your reason for posting these? The fact that you have to bump them means that people simply aren't responding to them. This is likely because you post a link without any actual post of your own.

If I want to start a conversation about a topic, I may share a link to enrich my post, but the link should not be the entirety of the post.

As for Moses and the red sea, that would not have been as much fun for movie makers.

 

[Xue Sheng]

Yeah seeing Charlton Heston strolling across the reed sea is much less cinematic than

 

[Daniel Sullivan]

Yeah seeing Charlton Heston strolling across the reed sea is much less cinematic than

Not if he were gunning down the Egyptians with a Gatling gun.

 

[Dirty Dog]

A source with more credibility than the OP...

 

[Xue Sheng]

Not if he were gunning down the Egyptians with a Gatling gun.

Now that is just crazy talk....they didn't have Gatling guns back then