So ,, first the post i called tripe, only had one bowling ball in it, you in order to make it lEss tripE you have inckuded an additional ball and second, that a claim with Out any scientific principle to back it up,
Maybe just read the posts you were too lazy to look up, that I re-posted for you.
Ive read them, id like you to prove yoyr claim they are roughly equivelent with some science , thats not an ubfair exspectation of someone who is making scietific claims, is it ?
What if your opponent steps back and your punch cannot reach him, but if you slide your back foot forward, you can hit him?
I provided a pretty simple explanation. You've not given any reason it doesn't demonstrate equivalence. So either you don't understand it (which I doubt) or you're just trolling for an argument by trying to get me to make more and more statements until you find something you can disagree with.
Your the one making claims, the burden of proof is yours, so either you have some scientific law and or a forumular to back up your claim or you dont, i conclude by your reluctance to give such that you dont , so the post is still tripe till you prove other wise
Nope. That's not how debate works. I put forth some evidence. If you don't think it suffices (an assertion on your part), then it's up to you to point out what about it isn't satisfactory. Until then, I can only assume you don't understand that simple explanation.
Then that would be something different.
- You have right leg forward.
You havebt given any evidence at all, just an opinion. Ive spent mutlple posts asking you to provieded evidence to back your opinion
So, what you're saying is that you didn't understand the quite simple explanation provided, and you're not even clear on what about it you do not understand.
So, what is the maximum compression being discussed?
When your right hand make a downward blocking, you extend your right hand forward as far as you can. At the same time you pull back your left shoulder as far as you can. When you can't "stretch" your body any more, you let your left punch to punch out as far as you can.
Your description on paper sounds similar to our method, although I don’t see it happening in that video clip. We call it “waist turning”, getting full rotation with the torso. Agreed, it is a training method used to learn to be power from the rotation and is not meant to actually fight with the exaggerated movement
Here is another example of compress (or stretch) and release. The back foot is sliding after the punch.
Yes, if you are stepping into your punch (lunge) the fact that there is much more mass in motion should mean more power. In reality however there are so many things involved in the transfer of that mass that should, but not always, equate to added power. In other words technique. If you roll two balls of different weights toward a target, all things being equal, the heavier ball will create more impact energy. If the heavier ball strays or slows, the lighter ball may make the greater impact. So, while your very broad statement has some truth, it is easy to quickly peel back just a few layers and see where it can easily error. Again, it comes down to technique.
That's interesting - a different approach than I've seen in other forms. What's the training purpose of the standing stomps that happen between some strikes?
The stomps remind the beginner that all force comes from the ground. You have to borrow the counter force from the ground before you can transfer it through your leg, hip, ... Whether or not this kind of stomp training is still needed during the advance level training, it was a big debate between the Taiwan Baji system and the China Baji system.
