New to EPAK... curriculum question

Forever Training

Yellow Belt
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Hello, all.

I am a newbie on this site although I have been studying kempo for a long time.

I come from a Shaolin Kempo background and am now interested in learning EPAK.

After doing some research about the style and its curriculum on-line, I recently visited
Clayton's Kenpo in South Windsor, CT to observe a class.

At this dojo, the 1-hour adult class has all levels of belts in it. I was told that after
15 min warming-up, the beginner group (white-purple) break off from the advanced
(blue and up). Then, the beginner group worked on their technique of the week
(Sleeper) and the advanced group did theirs. Then, for the last 15 minutes or so, sparring.

I was told that their system was to teach everyone in a group (white-purple) the same
technique (1 tech/week, 3 tech/month). The idea being that everyone in the group is on
the same page and tested on the same material, although they are promoted at different
levels depending on where in the cycle of techniques they are.

If I understand it correctly, regardless of where you start in the cycle, you will have all the
techniques/material at blue belt test, then you move into the advanced cycle.

Is this training cycle system common in EPAK dojos?

Follow-up Question:

This means that if a student comes to class twice per week, s/he receives about 1 cumulative
hour of technique instruction and partner practice per technique...give or take.

Does this seem adequate for the average adult to get the technique "locked into memory"
as one progresses through the techniques?


When compared to my kempo curriculum system, it appears that EPAK is faster-paced in
introducing material and expecting it to be learned, considering how many techniques there
are (holy cow, btw).
 
OP
Forever Training

Forever Training

Yellow Belt
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
In looking at some of these techniques, many of them seem relative quick & easy to pick up.

But, would like to know if this grouping cycle system (described above) is typical in EPAK dojos.
 

Tames D

RECKLESS
MTS Alumni
Joined
Apr 18, 2006
Messages
5,133
Reaction score
665
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Kenpo is not my main art, so I can only give you my perspective based on the experince I have had in EPAK. And it has been a while. I concentrate only on my art now days, with some cross training added. If I understand your post, it sounds like different belt levels learn the same technique for the first time together.
My experience was each belt level had a preset list of techeniques that we would learn and then tested on before advancing to a new level, then we would learn a whole new set of techniques for that belt level. In other words, yellow belts didn't learn purple techniques until reaching that level.
 

Blindside

Grandmaster
Founding Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2001
Messages
5,175
Reaction score
849
Location
Kennewick, WA
I wouldn't say it is common, I have only seen one school that uses that type of training curriculum. I can't say that I am a fan of it.
Sent from my Lumia 900 using Board Express
 
OP
Forever Training

Forever Training

Yellow Belt
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
...My experience was each belt level had a preset list of techeniques that we would learn and
then tested on before advancing to a new level, then we would learn a whole new set of techniques for that belt level.
In other words, yellow belts didn't learn purple techniques until reaching that level.

That's what I would have thought, but I think/guess that the cycle approach is done for ease of testing by the instructor.
Also, what if there is only 1 orange belt in the class, for example. Who works techniques with him/her, if the purple belts
are working on different techniques?

I agree that there should be a logical progression in learning the techniques, but maybe the thinking is that the differences
in difficulty between yellow, orange and purple is minimal....IDK.

What do the rest of you think? Any instructors out there teach with this type of system?
 

Lightning Ram

Yellow Belt
Joined
Sep 17, 2008
Messages
25
Reaction score
2
Location
Olympia, WA
This means that if a student comes to class twice per week, s/he receives about 1 cumulative
hour of technique instruction and partner practice per technique...give or take.

Then you need to take it upon yourself to stay after class and continue to work on technique, or at home. I was lucky to train at dojo's were I would take class and workout for a couple of hours sparring, bag work, whatever and lockup when I was done. Also had a basement at my home that was set up for workouts. Helps you progress faster.
 

punisher73

Senior Master
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Messages
3,959
Reaction score
1,056
When it comes to EPAK especially, you will find MANY different ways it is taught and trained. Each school will vary and each organization has their own way of doing things.

I know in many of the Tracy schools (some other kenpo schools do it this way too), offer private lessons in your monthly fee that you train one on one with the instructor to learn the techniques you need to know for testing and work on other things you need. Then you can get reps in with a partner in the group classes.
 
OP
Forever Training

Forever Training

Yellow Belt
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
This means that if a student comes to class twice per week, s/he receives about 1 cumulative
hour of technique instruction and partner practice per technique...give or take.

Then you need to take it upon yourself to stay after class and continue to work on technique, or at home. I was lucky to train at dojo's were I would take class and workout for a couple of hours sparring, bag work, whatever and lockup when I was done. Also had a basement at my home that was set up for workouts. Helps you progress faster.

And that has been my issue throughout all my MA training. Not enough repetition work on combos/techs. You only get so much time to practice with a partner during class and to really get them into muscle memory and "own it" requires so much more repetition. Pairing up with a partner out of class I think is key. Practicing "in the air" or in front of a mirror doesn't cut it.
 

MJS

Administrator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
30,187
Reaction score
430
Location
Cromwell,CT
Hello, all.

I am a newbie on this site although I have been studying kempo for a long time.

I come from a Shaolin Kempo background and am now interested in learning EPAK.

After doing some research about the style and its curriculum on-line, I recently visited
Clayton's Kenpo in South Windsor, CT to observe a class.

At this dojo, the 1-hour adult class has all levels of belts in it. I was told that after
15 min warming-up, the beginner group (white-purple) break off from the advanced
(blue and up). Then, the beginner group worked on their technique of the week
(Sleeper) and the advanced group did theirs. Then, for the last 15 minutes or so, sparring.

I was told that their system was to teach everyone in a group (white-purple) the same
technique (1 tech/week, 3 tech/month). The idea being that everyone in the group is on
the same page and tested on the same material, although they are promoted at different
levels depending on where in the cycle of techniques they are.

If I understand it correctly, regardless of where you start in the cycle, you will have all the
techniques/material at blue belt test, then you move into the advanced cycle.

Is this training cycle system common in EPAK dojos?

Follow-up Question:

This means that if a student comes to class twice per week, s/he receives about 1 cumulative
hour of technique instruction and partner practice per technique...give or take.

Does this seem adequate for the average adult to get the technique "locked into memory"
as one progresses through the techniques?


When compared to my kempo curriculum system, it appears that EPAK is faster-paced in
introducing material and expecting it to be learned, considering how many techniques there
are (holy cow, btw).

I'm assuming that the people in the group (white-purple) will be working on the respective tech. for their level? ie: white belts are working on a tech for their level, yellow for their level, etc., and not that all the belts are working on the same tech. Anyways...each school will probably vary. When I'd teach, I'd sometimes cover at least 2, but I'd take into consideration the tech being taught, and the progress that everyone is making. Why move on to a new tech if the group is having a hard time with the first one? Of course, just because someone says they have it, doesnt necessarily mean they've really got it.
 

Latest Discussions

Top