My opinion on self defense. I want your opinions!

FlamingJulian

Blue Belt
Joined
Aug 21, 2016
Messages
267
Reaction score
23
So self defense in my Taekwondo school id where someone does and unrealistic grab on you and you go though a series of movements then execute a counter attack. My issue with this: if someone is going to handshake me and hold my hand there I'm going to side kick them, or kick them in the groin, or punch them in the face rather than taking two steps to the side, yanking their arm down, and kicking them in the face with a front kick. Do any of you agree or disagree? I feel like these moves won't help me in the street? Any suggestions? Is this all completely useless? Thanks guys
 

JowGaWolf

Sr. Grandmaster
MT Mentor
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
13,954
Reaction score
5,841
I'm having a hard dime visualizing what you are describing. The rule that I follow is that self-defense should be practical and simple based on skill level of the person who has to use the technique. Was this technique specifically stated as a self-defense technique?
 
OP
FlamingJulian

FlamingJulian

Blue Belt
Joined
Aug 21, 2016
Messages
267
Reaction score
23
I'm having a hard dime visualizing what you are describing. The rule that I follow is that self-defense should be practical and simple based on skill level of the person who has to use the technique. Was this technique specifically stated as a self-defense technique?

Yes it was. It kind of scars me cause I'm the street that's not practical enough. The people in the class are pretty good at sparing so I know it's not a Mc Dojo because I know how Mc Dojo's work lol.


-Julian
 

Monkey Turned Wolf

MT Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 4, 2012
Messages
12,209
Reaction score
6,305
Location
New York
So self defense in my Taekwondo school id where someone does and unrealistic grab on you and you go though a series of movements then execute a counter attack. My issue with this: if someone is going to handshake me and hold my hand there I'm going to side kick them, or kick them in the groin, or punch them in the face rather than taking two steps to the side, yanking their arm down, and kicking them in the face with a front kick. Do any of you agree or disagree? I feel like these moves won't help me in the street? Any suggestions? Is this all completely useless? Thanks guys
Based on how you're describing it, I wouldn't consider it a complicated technique - it's basically just pulling them so they focus on your hand and kicking them, no? The only issue I would have is aiming the kick at the face, but then again I am not a TKD guy.
 
OP
FlamingJulian

FlamingJulian

Blue Belt
Joined
Aug 21, 2016
Messages
267
Reaction score
23
Based on how you're describing it, I wouldn't consider it a complicated technique - it's basically just pulling them so they focus on your hand and kicking them, no? The only issue I would have is aiming the kick at the face, but then again I am not a TKD guy.

The face kick is easy for a Tkd fighter. But if more then just pulling them. It's hard to explain but it involves a side step and a techniques call "sticky fingers".


-Julian
 

Gerry Seymour

MT Moderator
Staff member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
29,968
Reaction score
10,524
Location
Hendersonville, NC
So self defense in my Taekwondo school id where someone does and unrealistic grab on you and you go though a series of movements then execute a counter attack. My issue with this: if someone is going to handshake me and hold my hand there I'm going to side kick them, or kick them in the groin, or punch them in the face rather than taking two steps to the side, yanking their arm down, and kicking them in the face with a front kick. Do any of you agree or disagree? I feel like these moves won't help me in the street? Any suggestions? Is this all completely useless? Thanks guys
The specific moves you learn when working on self-defense are only selections of what's possible. One option is to step to the side, pull the arm down, and kick in the face. There are many others. Which you choose should depend upon the situation, rather than your personal preferences. I've taken some of the really complex techniques in NGA and shown students (and some instructors) where they actually fit during reasonable movement. Often, they show up when another technique fails, or when we fumble past something else, or when we just keep moving, waiting for an opening to happen. We practice a variety of techniques and applications so we learn to recognize the right openings, rather than forcing a technique where it doesn't belong.
 

Gerry Seymour

MT Moderator
Staff member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
29,968
Reaction score
10,524
Location
Hendersonville, NC
Yes it was. It kind of scars me cause I'm the street that's not practical enough. The people in the class are pretty good at sparing so I know it's not a Mc Dojo because I know how Mc Dojo's work lol.


-Julian
It doesn't sound over-complex. It sounds like it gets you off-line from an attack, off-balances the attacker, and renders a strike. There are more steps than just hitting or kicking, but the other movements have purpose. If you don't understand the purpose, it seems cumbersome. If you know the purpose, it fits a certain set of circumstances quite nicely.
 
OP
FlamingJulian

FlamingJulian

Blue Belt
Joined
Aug 21, 2016
Messages
267
Reaction score
23
It doesn't sound over-complex. It sounds like it gets you off-line from an attack, off-balances the attacker, and renders a strike. There are more steps than just hitting or kicking, but the other movements have purpose. If you don't understand the purpose, it seems cumbersome. If you know the purpose, it fits a certain set of circumstances quite nicely.

Well like Bruce Lee said: "You do thousands and thousands of steps before you do one single thing" --< or something like that he said lol


-Julian
 

Gerry Seymour

MT Moderator
Staff member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
29,968
Reaction score
10,524
Location
Hendersonville, NC
Well like Bruce Lee said: "You do thousands and thousands of steps before you do one single thing" --< or something like that he said lol


-Julian
And Ueshiba Morihei (the founder of Aikido) once explained his art as "10,000 techniques and one technique". By that, I think he meant that people spent a lot of time learning different techniques so they could eventually understand the one underlying principle that tied them all together. I think there's a bit of that in every art.
 
OP
FlamingJulian

FlamingJulian

Blue Belt
Joined
Aug 21, 2016
Messages
267
Reaction score
23
And Ueshiba Morihei (the founder of Aikido) once explained his art as "10,000 techniques and one technique". By that, I think he meant that people spent a lot of time learning different techniques so they could eventually understand the one underlying principle that tied them all together. I think there's a bit of that in every art.

Dang good point


-Julian
 

JowGaWolf

Sr. Grandmaster
MT Mentor
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
13,954
Reaction score
5,841
Yes it was. It kind of scars me cause I'm the street that's not practical enough. The people in the class are pretty good at sparing so I know it's not a Mc Dojo because I know how Mc Dojo's work lol.


-Julian
I wonder if the context of the technique isn't understood. I still don't have an idea of what it looks like so I'm just thinking of reasons why a technique may not originally look practical but in reality it may be very practical for someone with the kicking ability of a TKD practitioner. Sometimes the actually real life application of a technique is more about the movement of the technique than the exact look of the technique. As my Sifu says, the goal isn't to use the form, but the shape of the technique. In your case the form of the technique is the hand shake grab, but the shape of the technique is grabbing someone's wrist to pull them off balance and then kicking them.

I'm not saying that it's correct or wrong because I don't do TKD. But it may require you to deeper explore the context of the technique.
 
OP
FlamingJulian

FlamingJulian

Blue Belt
Joined
Aug 21, 2016
Messages
267
Reaction score
23
I wonder if the context of the technique isn't understood. I still don't have an idea of what it looks like so I'm just thinking of reasons why a technique may not originally look practical but in reality it may be very practical for someone with the kicking ability of a TKD practitioner. Sometimes the actually real life application of a technique is more about the movement of the technique than the exact look of the technique. As my Sifu says, the goal isn't to use the form, but the shape of the technique. In your case the form of the technique is the hand shake grab, but the shape of the technique is grabbing someone's wrist to pull them off balance and then kicking them.

I'm not saying that it's correct or wrong because I don't do TKD. But it may require you to deeper explore the context of the technique.

True I agree.


-Julian
 

drop bear

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Feb 23, 2014
Messages
23,337
Reaction score
8,070
I wonder if the context of the technique isn't understood. I still don't have an idea of what it looks like so I'm just thinking of reasons why a technique may not originally look practical but in reality it may be very practical for someone with the kicking ability of a TKD practitioner. Sometimes the actually real life application of a technique is more about the movement of the technique than the exact look of the technique. As my Sifu says, the goal isn't to use the form, but the shape of the technique. In your case the form of the technique is the hand shake grab, but the shape of the technique is grabbing someone's wrist to pull them off balance and then kicking them.

I'm not saying that it's correct or wrong because I don't do TKD. But it may require you to deeper explore the context of the technique.

I am envisioning a bit of re stomping the groin.

Otherwise it is not exactly wasted. But you generally should work one or two defences and then let your partner counter. So you don have a fifty strike combination against a guy just standing there.

 
Last edited:

wingchun100

Senior Master
Joined
Sep 2, 2013
Messages
3,300
Reaction score
525
Location
Troy NY
So self defense in my Taekwondo school id where someone does and unrealistic grab on you and you go though a series of movements then execute a counter attack. My issue with this: if someone is going to handshake me and hold my hand there I'm going to side kick them, or kick them in the groin, or punch them in the face rather than taking two steps to the side, yanking their arm down, and kicking them in the face with a front kick. Do any of you agree or disagree? I feel like these moves won't help me in the street? Any suggestions? Is this all completely useless? Thanks guys

While I was looking around for the style I wanted to study, I visited a lot of martial arts schools...took a lot of free lessons. Sadly, MANY of them started me out with the "if someone grabs your wrist" shtick. The defensive moves you described are not useless, but the whole wrist-grabbing thing is unrealistic. I've witnessed a lot of street fights in my day. No one ever went for a wrist grab first. If I were you, I would check out some other schools. You want to find a style where, when you see it, you say, "Wow, I see how that could be applied!" You want something that speaks out to you, that strikes you as making sense the SECOND you see it.

At least, that is my opinion on it anyway...for what it's worth.
 
OP
FlamingJulian

FlamingJulian

Blue Belt
Joined
Aug 21, 2016
Messages
267
Reaction score
23
While I was looking around for the style I wanted to study, I visited a lot of martial arts schools...took a lot of free lessons. Sadly, MANY of them started me out with the "if someone grabs your wrist" shtick. The defensive moves you described are not useless, but the whole wrist-grabbing thing is unrealistic. I've witnessed a lot of street fights in my day. No one ever went for a wrist grab first. If I were you, I would check out some other schools. You want to find a style where, when you see it, you say, "Wow, I see how that could be applied!" You want something that speaks out to you, that strikes you as making sense the SECOND you see it.

At least, that is my opinion on it anyway...for what it's worth.

Thanks for replying. I would check out some other schools but will stick with my school. I'll just have to do both. I'm passionate about Taekwondo and do believe that it's a great art. I just think that there are useless things in it.


-Julian
 

Flatfish

Black Belt
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
679
Reaction score
296
I know exactly what you are talking about as I have had the same thoughts many times. In our curriculum up to 1st Dan we learn 60 self defense techniques/responses. Some of them I would consider worthwhile and with appropriate training should be able to be applied in a real encounter, while others are utter and complete hogwash.
The one that almost made me quit TKD was a counter to a front kick that involved punching the top of the foot. I guess it could come in handy if you are attacked on the beach by a barefooted villain, dunno.

I think these things just get passed down out of tradition with many instructors not questioning whether useful or not.

Anyway, I will resolve this for myself by taking time after my 1st Dan test to more realistically work on the techniques that I think might be useful and separating wheat and chaff so to speak.
My goal for where I would like to take my TKD is for it to be effective in case I ever need it. I like sparring but I am old and stiff and will never really be competitive so I will focus on the other stuff.
 
OP
FlamingJulian

FlamingJulian

Blue Belt
Joined
Aug 21, 2016
Messages
267
Reaction score
23
I know exactly what you are talking about as I have had the same thoughts many times. In our curriculum up to 1st Dan we learn 60 self defense techniques/responses. Some of them I would consider worthwhile and with appropriate training should be able to be applied in a real encounter, while others are utter and complete hogwash.
The one that almost made me quit TKD was a counter to a front kick that involved punching the top of the foot. I guess it could come in handy if you are attacked on the beach by a barefooted villain, dunno.

I think these things just get passed down out of tradition with many instructors not questioning whether useful or not.

Anyway, I will resolve this for myself by taking time after my 1st Dan test to more realistically work on the techniques that I think might be useful and separating wheat and chaff so to speak.
My goal for where I would like to take my TKD is for it to be effective in case I ever need it. I like sparring but I am old and stiff and will never really be competitive so I will focus on the other stuff.

Thanks for replying. I agree with all of your points too. I don't see myself quitting Taekwondo because there's a lot of things I like from it. I can't imagine would would top it Besides JKD but that's all opinion based.


-Julian
 

Tony Dismukes

MT Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 11, 2005
Messages
7,576
Reaction score
7,611
Location
Lexington, KY
In my opinion, it's rather a misnomer to call these techniques "self-defense", although I believe that is a more or less direct translation of "hosinsul", which is the general term for this portion of the TKD curriculum.

What I've seen from many TKD schools is that their hosinsul curriculum seems to be a collection of counters (possibly derived from hapkido) to various (mostly static, mostly unrealistic) grabs. Often the techniques use an entirely different set of body mechanics and tactics from what is taught in the forms and in sparring. From my standpoint as a grappler, the execution and understanding of these techniques is often... not very impressive. This would be a typical example of the sort of stuff I usually see:

This is a gross generalization, of course. I'm sure there are TKD schools where the hosinsul material is better thought out and more integrated with the rest of the curriculum. Perhaps some of the senior TKD practitioners here can offer some input on the subject.
 

Latest Discussions

Top