Marshal shoots passenger Miami airport

Ping898

Senior Master
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2004
Messages
3,669
Reaction score
25
Location
Earth
Some idiot is trying to screw it up for the rest of us, just in time for the holidays..... It is a breaking story but apparently some guy claimed he had bombs and was shot and killed in the jetway going to a plane...

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/12/07/airplane.gunshot/index.html

"A federal official told CNN that the passenger was shot by a federal air marshal, who felt the passenger was acting in a threatening manner. A senior administration official added that the passenger claimed to have a bomb in his carry-on luggage.

An air marshal told the passenger to stop, and he did not, the official said, adding that the marshal fired after the passenger reached into his carry-on bag."
 

michaeledward

Grandmaster
Joined
Mar 1, 2003
Messages
6,063
Reaction score
82
Certainly, TSA does not have a sense of humor. Federal Air Marshalls should not have a sense of humor.

Making statements about having a bomb on a plane should be considered a request to get shot.

It is odd that the reports of the person having a bomb are coming from "senior administration officials".

A federal official told CNN that the passenger was shot by a federal air marshal, who felt the passenger was acting in a threatening manner. A senior administration official added that the passenger claimed to have a bomb in his carry-on luggage.


This story will bear watching as it unfolds.
 

Tgace

Grandmaster
Joined
Jul 31, 2003
Messages
7,766
Reaction score
409
So far it sounds like a "good shoot" to me. Although the article says wounded, not killed. Im awaiting the 3-ring circus thats sure to follow however. I can only hope that the guy was some "average middle class white guy". Because there always seems to be some racial issues in these sort of things lately. The Brazilian guy in London being forefront in my mind....
 

Kreth

Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Aug 26, 2003
Messages
6,980
Reaction score
86
Location
Oneonta, NY
I find it odd that the article doesn't mention whether he did in fact have anything in his carry-on that would be considered an explosive device. And, this is just a guess, but I'm guessing that the "senior administration official" refers to the Federal Aviation Administration. Sorry, conspiracy theorists...
 
OP
Ping898

Ping898

Senior Master
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2004
Messages
3,669
Reaction score
25
Location
Earth
michaeledward said:
Certainly, TSA does not have a sense of humor. Federal Air Marshalls should not have a sense of humor.

Making statements about having a bomb on a plane should be considered a request to get shot.

I agree, but I think there has to be another way to protect everyone in the instances when someone is mentally unstable and making false claims. I don't know what they way is, but I have to think there is another solution out there that can disable someone without killing them....
Based on the evidence reported so far it sounds like the air marshalls did what they were trained to.....hopefully further evidence will support what they did and this won't be a huge mistake
 

Tgace

Grandmaster
Joined
Jul 31, 2003
Messages
7,766
Reaction score
409
Kreth said:
I find it odd that the article doesn't mention whether he did in fact have anything in his carry-on that would be considered an explosive device.

Wouldnt really matter as long as the Marshal reasonably believed the guy was a threat.
 
OP
Ping898

Ping898

Senior Master
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2004
Messages
3,669
Reaction score
25
Location
Earth
Kreth said:
I find it odd that the article doesn't mention whether he did in fact have anything in his carry-on that would be considered an explosive device.

I don't think they know yet....still a breaking story....
 

Tgace

Grandmaster
Joined
Jul 31, 2003
Messages
7,766
Reaction score
409
Ping898 said:
I agree, but I think there has to be another way to protect everyone in the instances when someone is mentally unstable and making false claims. I don't know what they way is, but I have to think there is another solution out there that can disable someone without killing them....
Based on the evidence reported so far it sounds like the air marshalls did what they were trained to.....hopefully further evidence will support what they did and this won't be a huge mistake

The guy said he had a BOMB not a knife. Do you recommend we wait for the BOOM! To see if its legit? If the guy says hes has a bomb does he really have to have one for the Marshals actions to be justified in your opinion?
 

arnisador

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Aug 28, 2001
Messages
44,573
Reaction score
456
Location
Terre Haute, IN
I wonder if we'll learn that the individual had mental problems. I can't question the decision to shoot, based on a man who claimed to have a bomb reaching into a bag; but, would a person who really intended to bomb something do that? I suspect we're looking at a case of 'suicide by cop' as they say.
 

Tgace

Grandmaster
Joined
Jul 31, 2003
Messages
7,766
Reaction score
409
When you have to make the decision, you have to go with whats presented to you. Do you just assume that a bomber wouldnt say he had a bomb and not shoot? Then if he goes off (and you live) you will be questioned as to why you didnt shoot.
 

MJS

Administrator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
30,187
Reaction score
430
Location
Cromwell,CT
Kreth said:
I find it odd that the article doesn't mention whether he did in fact have anything in his carry-on that would be considered an explosive device. And, this is just a guess, but I'm guessing that the "senior administration official" refers to the Federal Aviation Administration. Sorry, conspiracy theorists...

I'm watching CNN/MSNBC right now and as of yet, I havent heard anything about a bomb. They're saying that he may have had some mental problems, but it still amazes me as to how many people STILL, even after all the beefed up security, etc., that people still find it funny to make bomb comments.

I'm sure it'll be a matter of time and we'll hear people say, "Why did he have to shoot and kill him? Why didn't he shoot him in the leg?" Its people that like that I just wanna :whip: because they do not have a clue!

Mike
 

MJS

Administrator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
30,187
Reaction score
430
Location
Cromwell,CT
Tgace said:
When you have to make the decision, you have to go with whats presented to you. Do you just assume that a bomber wouldnt say he had a bomb and not shoot? Then if he goes off (and you live) you will be questioned as to why you didnt shoot.

I give alot of credit to the LEOs. This Marshal had to make a split second decision, and IMO, he made the right one! The fact of the matter is, is that this guy made a comment, acted aggressively, ran, made a movement towards his bag, giving a very strong impression that he was going to do something. Better to take the guy out than have him blow up the plane and take X number of people with him.

Mike
 

michaeledward

Grandmaster
Joined
Mar 1, 2003
Messages
6,063
Reaction score
82
Kreth said:
I find it odd that the article doesn't mention whether he did in fact have anything in his carry-on that would be considered an explosive device. And, this is just a guess, but I'm guessing that the "senior administration official" refers to the Federal Aviation Administration. Sorry, conspiracy theorists...

As the articles are updated, the 'Senior Administration Official' attribution is being updated. Now there is a name for a Department of Homeland Security official.

However, 'Senior Administration Official' is not an FAA official.This attribution generally refers to secretarys and deputy secretarys.

There was an article in 'Slate' that described this attribution ... and says there are perhaps 100 people who can be so attributed as 'Senior Administration Officials'.
 

MJS

Administrator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
30,187
Reaction score
430
Location
Cromwell,CT
Ping898 said:
I agree, but I think there has to be another way to protect everyone in the instances when someone is mentally unstable and making false claims. I don't know what they way is, but I have to think there is another solution out there that can disable someone without killing them....
Based on the evidence reported so far it sounds like the air marshalls did what they were trained to.....hopefully further evidence will support what they did and this won't be a huge mistake

A few things to take into consideration here.

1: How can we tell what the mental capacity of someone is?

2: When a LEO is faced with the choice to shoot, and any LEO out there, please correct me if I'm wrong, but they're going to be aiming for center mass, not the legs, etc.

Mike
 

Tgace

Grandmaster
Joined
Jul 31, 2003
Messages
7,766
Reaction score
409
The handgun is not a "less lethal" weapon. Shooting for center mass and even the head is not 100% effective, depending on incapacitating someone with a pistol is a non-starter. Its center mass till the threat is no longer a threat.
 

Michael Billings

Senior Master
MTS Alumni
Joined
Apr 5, 2002
Messages
3,962
Reaction score
31
Location
Austin, Texas USA-Terra
Good call if the man was acting as reported. Mental health issues aside, you cannot necessarily evaluate that at the time the threat or terroristic action is started. You do your best with what you have at the time. THAT is what makes any LEO's job so tough. Hindsight is always 20/20.

-Michael
 

rutherford

Master Black Belt
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
1,194
Reaction score
13
Location
Vermont, USA
Just a quick update: fatal shooting.

You know, of anybody the air marshals would definitely be the people I want trained to shoot center mass. Lots of people and plane parts that could easily be hit by stray shots.
 

MJS

Administrator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
30,187
Reaction score
430
Location
Cromwell,CT
Tgace said:
The handgun is not a "less lethal" weapon. Shooting for center mass and even the head is not 100% effective, depending on incapacitating someone with a pistol is a non-starter. Its center mass till the threat is no longer a threat.

I agree! Considering the ongoing threats, the war, etc. I really dont see Marshals using LL weapons. When they're faced with a deadly situation, I would hope that theyd continue to use whatever force necessary.

Mike
 

MJS

Administrator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
30,187
Reaction score
430
Location
Cromwell,CT
rutherford said:
Just a quick update: fatal shooting.

You know, of anybody the air marshals would definitely be the people I want trained to shoot center mass. Lots of people and plane parts that could easily be hit by stray shots.

Exactly!!! This plane was on the ground, but imagine if it was in the air!! Taking out a window would lead to a worse situation.

Side note: I heard that there were no explosives found. It'll be a matter of time before the 'fun' begins.

Mike
 

arnisador

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Aug 28, 2001
Messages
44,573
Reaction score
456
Location
Terre Haute, IN
Michael Billings said:
Good call if the man was acting as reported. Mental health issues aside, you cannot necessarily evaluate that at the time the threat or terroristic action is started. You do your best with what you have at the time.

Absolutely. There's no way of knowing the whole story when there are only minutes or even seconds to react.
 

Latest Discussions

Top