Is It Important To Have A Successor?

MJS

Administrator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
30,187
Reaction score
430
Location
Cromwell,CT
Many times, the founder or current head of a system will designate someone to take over the art once they pass. EPAK has many high ranking people who have gone on to carry on the teachings of Mr. Parker, in their own unique way. There are different branches, each with their own way of doing things.

My question is: If Mr. Parker had left someone as successor to the art, would things be different from the way they are today?
 
OP
M

MJS

Administrator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
30,187
Reaction score
430
Location
Cromwell,CT
Dark Kenpo Lord said:
Without a doubt.

DarK LorD

Would you care to expand on this from your point of view? :ultracool

Mike
 

Blindside

Grandmaster
Founding Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2001
Messages
5,175
Reaction score
849
Location
Kennewick, WA
MJS said:
My question is: If Mr. Parker had left someone as successor to the art, would things be different from the way they are today?

I don't think so, there were several breakoffs prior to Mr. Parkers death, and I think people are simply loyal to people, not necessarily to the official lineage. If an official lineage goes to someone who I don't think has as good a combination of knowledge, technique, teaching ability, and character as another, then I'll follow the guy who I thought was better.

Lamont
 

terryl965

<center><font size="2"><B>Martial Talk Ultimate<BR
MTS Alumni
Joined
Apr 9, 2004
Messages
41,259
Reaction score
340
Location
Grand Prairie Texas
MJS said:
Would you care to expand on this from your point of view? :ultracool

Mike

I'll answer with my opinion Mr Parker would have the respect from his top students to follow his wishes about his art, with that being said Mr parker always like to try new and different variations of the same techniques from time to time. People have a trendicies to have to be the one and since nobody was left they all decided to teach the way they thought he wanted.
Terry
 

Seig

Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Apr 18, 2002
Messages
8,069
Reaction score
25
Location
Mountaineer Martial Arts - Shepherdstown,WV
I believe that the system may be different, but not so much a lot of the politics. Mr. Parker had people constatntly coming and going, some for their own agendas and others that thought change was bad, and even some that thought he was not changing fast enough. I feel the main difference that we would have today is a lot less people openly bad mouthing him or falsely claiming training.
 

Andrew Green

Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Aug 1, 2004
Messages
8,627
Reaction score
452
Location
Winnipeg MB
Not really, there still would've been political fighting for control and new organizations splitting off with their own big poopa.

After 35 years training, a person is unlikely to decided to remain under someone with about the same experience, there is going to come a time where a person refuses to follow and has to go their own way.

It's in our nature, we follow till we are comfortable then eventually we want to start making the decissions for ourself.

Same thing has happened in every system that has tried to have a single head.
 

Danjo

Master Black Belt
Joined
Mar 31, 2004
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
60
Location
Fullerton, CA
I think that it only works when you have something rigid for a successor to defend and perpetuate. When something is in a constant state of flux, then a successor does little good. If Parker had left a rigid system like Shotokan etc., then there would be a point to have someone there to defend it's orthodoxy. What Parker left, it seems, was a concept similar to how Bruce Lee left JKD. Therefore, the only successor that he could have left would have been one that would continue to run his business and say who was officially promoted etc.
 

Doc

Senior Master
Joined
May 12, 2002
Messages
4,240
Reaction score
180
Location
Southern California
MJS said:
Many times, the founder or current head of a system will designate someone to take over the art once they pass. EPAK has many high ranking people who have gone on to carry on the teachings of Mr. Parker, in their own unique way. There are different branches, each with their own way of doing things.

My question is: If Mr. Parker had left someone as successor to the art, would things be different from the way they are today?
No. Ed Parker was a completely unique individual who despite his "uniqueness," never kept any of his people together and moving in the same direction. He began "losing" students in the beginning and always lost significant students for various reasons in every generation.

Many of the "factions" of kenpo that split off from Parker existed while he was alive. Now that he has passed, nothing has changed except the number of 10ths. Many that did stay did so only until they achiweved the rank they were seeking over knowledge that was available they didn't seek for whatever reason.

Clearly a named successor would have, at the least, done no better than Parker himself to hold people together, and the introduction of the commercial product did nothing but exacerbate the situation. A successor in all likelyhood, would have not done any better than what we have today.
 

Rich Parsons

A Student of Martial Arts
Founding Member
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Oct 13, 2001
Messages
16,835
Reaction score
1,079
Location
Michigan
Doc said:
No. Ed Parker was a completely unique individual who despite his "uniqueness," never kept any of his people together and moving in the same direction. He began "losing" students in the beginning and always lost significant students for various reasons in every generation.

Many of the "factions" of kenpo that split off from Parker existed while he was alive. Now that he has passed, nothing has changed except the number of 10ths. Many that did stay did so only until they achiweved the rank they were seeking over knowledge that was available they didn't seek for whatever reason.

Clearly a named successor would have, at the least, done no better than Parker himself to hold people together, and the introduction of the commercial product did nothing but exacerbate the situation. A successor in all likelyhood, would have not done any better than what we have today.

To give further evidence of this point:

I have seen this in other arts as well. A sucessor or group of people selected to continue on who may or may not be the current "Active" students. They may or may not be the Highest promoted by the Leader of the Art. There may be issues of Rank or personalities or policitics including greed that could offer for the splits in today's environment.

A good Student will know his teacher has taught him, even if it is different from what he may have taught others. This student with the right training and understanding should be able to make a good instructor. This instructor may not appeal to everyone, due to the above mentioned politics or personailities or even egos.

I think it might have been different, yet close in the end.

Just my thoughts.
 

IWishToLearn

3rd Black Belt
Joined
Apr 27, 2005
Messages
969
Reaction score
5
Location
Salinas, CA
I really do enjoy seeing debates that are thought provoking like this. Thanks for commenting everyone :).
 

Doc

Senior Master
Joined
May 12, 2002
Messages
4,240
Reaction score
180
Location
Southern California
IWishToLearn said:
I really do enjoy seeing debates that are thought provoking like this. Thanks for commenting everyone :).
Many of the "newbies" lack perspective through no fault of their own. But off the top of my head: Parker's second black belt, James ibrao, left him in less than a year after receiving his black in 9 months. Rick Flores, and Rich Montgomery left to go with Jimmy Woo when he left. Dave German left to start his own style, T.A.I. Karate. Joe Dimmick, started Red Dragaon and later Sam Pai Kenpo, Bob Perry dubbed Universal Kenpo, The Tracy's, etc. All left in the late fifties to early sixties to do there own thing long before most people you know in kenpo even started with Parker. Nothing new. Just some memories from one of the "ancients."
 
OP
M

MJS

Administrator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
30,187
Reaction score
430
Location
Cromwell,CT
Doc said:
No. Ed Parker was a completely unique individual who despite his "uniqueness," never kept any of his people together and moving in the same direction. He began "losing" students in the beginning and always lost significant students for various reasons in every generation.

Many of the "factions" of kenpo that split off from Parker existed while he was alive. Now that he has passed, nothing has changed except the number of 10ths. Many that did stay did so only until they achiweved the rank they were seeking over knowledge that was available they didn't seek for whatever reason.

Clearly a named successor would have, at the least, done no better than Parker himself to hold people together, and the introduction of the commercial product did nothing but exacerbate the situation. A successor in all likelyhood, would have not done any better than what we have today.

Would having a successor eliminate the politics that we often see?
 

Ceicei

Grandmaster
MT Mentor
Joined
Apr 23, 2003
Messages
6,775
Reaction score
85
Location
Utah
MJS said:
Would having a successor eliminate the politics that we often see?

I highly doubt it. Politics will still continue. There will always be others that may question the role of that successor or suggest someone else might be better. It doesn't really matter whether it is martial arts, sports, business, or even a grass-roots organization. Politics (whether overt or "behind doors") will tend to crop up.

- Ceicei
 

Dark Kenpo Lord

Brown Belt
Joined
Feb 22, 2004
Messages
425
Reaction score
48
Location
So. Cal.
MJS said:
Would you care to expand on this from your point of view? :ultracool

Mike

If Parker had named a successor, he would have also outlined the curriculum he wanted taught, and to who for that matter. I don't think we'd be facing "Well, Parker wanted change" attitude near as much, and I think the standard would've held with the majority. Yes, you'd have factions and separations, but nothing like we have now where some are on the 24, 16 etc.. I also think that a lot of the changes/deletions would've come to a much more halted state had he left a successor with curriculum to be taught as EPAK. Politics however, wouldn't have changed and the IKKA would still be dead.

DarK LorD
 
OP
M

MJS

Administrator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
30,187
Reaction score
430
Location
Cromwell,CT
Dark Kenpo Lord said:
If Parker had named a successor, he would have also outlined the curriculum he wanted taught, and to who for that matter. I don't think we'd be facing "Well, Parker wanted change" attitude near as much, and I think the standard would've held with the majority. Yes, you'd have factions and separations, but nothing like we have now where some are on the 24, 16 etc.. I also think that a lot of the changes/deletions would've come to a much more halted state had he left a successor with curriculum to be taught as EPAK. Politics however, wouldn't have changed and the IKKA would still be dead.

DarK LorD

Thanks Clyde! This is along the lines of what I was thinking. I agree that the problems would most likely be there, but at least there would be someone as a guide, so to speak.

Mike
 

jdinca

Master Black Belt
Joined
Dec 8, 2005
Messages
1,297
Reaction score
11
Location
SF Bay Area
Having a successor might have helped maintain some cohesiveness. Someone needs to guide the ship. The numerous different kenpo styles would still exist but there may have been less political back biting if a strong, respected individual were at the top. EPAK in particular might be in a better position if there had been a successor named.
 

Latest Discussions

Top