Identical twin studies show that homosexuality is not genetic

Dirty Dog

MT Senior Moderator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
23,363
Reaction score
9,102
Location
Pueblo West, CO
That's exactly what it mean. That's what normal is what a majority of society does. That's what makes something normal.

That doesn't make something normal. It makes it commonplace.

I'm bald. Most people are not. Does that make me "abnormal"?
 
OP
Makalakumu

Makalakumu

Gonzo Karate Apocalypse
MT Mentor
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Messages
13,887
Reaction score
232
Location
Hawaii
Yes, but not where sexual orientation itself is concerned. Attraction to inanimate objects, say, is abnormal--amongst other things, it often causes problems (distress).

Not necessarily, I can think of lots of inanimate objects that humans pleasure themselves with.

This discussion really gets interesting if we begin to consider masturbation.
 

ballen0351

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Dec 25, 2010
Messages
10,480
Reaction score
1,246
Not necessarily, I can think of lots of inanimate objects that humans pleasure themselves with.

This discussion really gets interesting if we begin to consider masturbation.
Masterbation is an act not a way of life
 

Sukerkin

Have the courage to speak softly
MT Mentor
Lifetime Supporting Member
MTS Alumni
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
15,325
Reaction score
493
Location
Staffordshire, England
There has long been quite some body of evidence that the incidence of homosexuality in a population has advantages for the group, especially as the size of the group increases. It is also the case that this is not a 'human problem' as many species show the proclivity for homosexual orientation, again especially when populations get beyond a critical number.

For me, after the usual strong reactions against it as a younger man (probably a legacy of my overly religious upbringing), I have not allowed strong opinions on homosexuality to factor over much in my life. I am far too interested in the beauty that is the female form to be much interested in the male form (no matter how Adonis like :D) and, thankfully, I am no longer young and pretty so I don't have to worry about rebuffing unwanted advances; so I don't let the existence of men who love men to ruffle my feathers much.

This article from the Economist touches on the evolutionary advantages of 'switching affections' for a social group: http://www.economist.com/node/12465295

P.S. The part about being "young and pretty" is a lie, I may have been young once but I have never been pretty :lol:.
 

Flying Crane

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 21, 2005
Messages
15,230
Reaction score
4,920
Location
San Francisco
OK we will just have to disagree here

well, if you believe it is a way of life, then that implies a person has the ability to make a deliberate choice about it. They could have gone either way, and they specifically chose gay. That's really at the root of the issue, in my opinion. When you recognize that it's not a choice, that it is simply who they are, it is the way they were "made", well then that really does change everything.
 

ballen0351

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Dec 25, 2010
Messages
10,480
Reaction score
1,246
well, if you believe it is a way of life, then that implies a person has the ability to make a deliberate choice about it. They could have gone either way, and they specifically chose gay. That's really at the root of the issue, in my opinion. When you recognize that it's not a choice, that it is simply who they are, it is the way they were "made", well then that really does change everything.
Ok
 

Dirty Dog

MT Senior Moderator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
23,363
Reaction score
9,102
Location
Pueblo West, CO
Yes again you act like abnormal is bad. Its not its just different

ab·nor·mal /abˈnôrməl/

Adjective
Deviating from what is normal or usual, typically in a way that is undesirable.

Synonyms
anomalous - unnatural - irregular - aberrant - unusual


If you're going to make up your own definitions, then it's going to be really difficult to carry on a conversation. Unless there's a Ballen-English dictionary around that I can consult?
 

ballen0351

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Dec 25, 2010
Messages
10,480
Reaction score
1,246
If you're going to make up your own definitions, then it's going to be really difficult to carry on a conversation. Unless there's a Ballen-English dictionary around that I can consult?

Ok everything's normal nothings different were all the same but not.
 

Big Don

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 2, 2007
Messages
10,551
Reaction score
189
Location
Sanger CA
I don't think that's supportable, especially when we are talking about humans. Procreation is most definitely not the only reason for sex. In the animal world we can look at the Bonobos, sometimes called "pigmy chimpanzees" (incorrectly so, as they are a distinct species but they look very very similar). Their social interactions center largely on sexual interaction, including between members of the same sex.

At any rate, I think the mistake is in believing that there are only two sexes and one sexuality. In my opinion, there are more than that. There are male and female and heterosexual, but also bi and gay as real sexualities that ought to be included in the list. Trying to make hetero and "the" sexuality is a mistake and as long as we keep trying to have only one catagory for that, well we are just gonna keep having trouble with it. I believe that bi and homo and possibly some other sexual orientations that don't fit quite so cleanly into these categories, are entirely normal sexualities. Just because they are found less commonly in society doesn't mean they are not normal.

Animals are by definition amoral. People, have morals, well some...
 

Dirty Dog

MT Senior Moderator
Staff member
Lifetime Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
23,363
Reaction score
9,102
Location
Pueblo West, CO
Animals are by definition amoral. People, have morals, well some...

Implying that your sexual orientation is the only moral one, and that those who do not align with you are somehow lacking in morals.

:bs:
 

ballen0351

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Dec 25, 2010
Messages
10,480
Reaction score
1,246
Implying that your sexual orientation is the only moral one, and that those who do not align with you are somehow lacking in morals.

:bs:

Are you not judging his morals by your own to say he is BS. Whos morals do web go by then?
 

Steve

Mostly Harmless
Joined
Jul 9, 2008
Messages
21,920
Reaction score
7,475
Location
Covington, WA
Are you not judging his morals by your own to say he is BS. Whos morals do web go by then?
Morality is like a giant venn diagram. Most of us overlap on most things, but on some specific issues, what you believe is moral may be immoral to me. Don has declared that he is bigot. Further, he made it very clear that bigotry is, to him, moral, and that tolerance is immoral. I disagree. Do you?

Whether you do or not, the answer to your question is that you live by your own moral code. Don lives by his and Dirty Dog lives by his. But don't presume that on any given topic, your position is the only moral one. It just isn't.

For what it's worth, I don't think that you should be made to tolerate something you believe is immoral. I'm simply asserting that you should be able to acknowledge that other people have a different position, and that their position could be just as valid as your own. Not better or worse. But different.
 
Last edited:

ballen0351

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Dec 25, 2010
Messages
10,480
Reaction score
1,246
Morality is like a giant venn diagram. Most of us overlap on most things, but on some specific issues, what you believe is moral may be immoral to me. Don has declared that he is bigot. Further, he made it very clear that bigotry is, to him, moral, and that tolerance is immoral. I disagree. Do you?

Whether you do or not, the answer to your question is that you live by your own moral code. But don't presume that yours is the only one, or even that yours is the only "good" one.
I'm speaking more on a society level how do we (as in all of us). Decide what's OK and what's not. Or should we just be a more anything goes society?

I do find it quite interesting that in an effort to prove to me that homosexual behavior is "normal". People used pigmy monkeys and Afghan mountain warriors that treat woman as property as the proof.
 

Steve

Mostly Harmless
Joined
Jul 9, 2008
Messages
21,920
Reaction score
7,475
Location
Covington, WA
I'm speaking more on a society level how do we (as in all of us). Decide what's OK and what's not. Or should we just be a more anything goes society?

I do find it quite interesting that in an effort to prove to me that homosexual behavior is "normal". People used pigmy monkeys and Afghan mountain warriors that treat woman as property as the proof.
As I read your posts, my impression is that people were reacting to the negative connotations that the word "abnormal" carries with it. There are other words you could have used, but you chose "abnormal." Is it really a surprise to you that people reacted the way they did?
 

Latest Discussions

Top