How to Find a Wing Chun School That is Modernized

macher

Green Belt
Joined
Apr 2, 2018
Messages
156
Reaction score
44
Interesting in Wing Chun but realize that it’s best to find a school that teaches real life applications and that Wing Chun could be modified to incorporate techniques like boxing and ground fighting. I’m in the Philly area. What’s the best way to find out if a school teaches not necessarily the traditional way but more adaptable in today’s world? Thanks!
 
OP
M

macher

Green Belt
Joined
Apr 2, 2018
Messages
156
Reaction score
44
I’ve been watching videos on this Sifu channel and it looks like he incorporates other arts in his Wing Chun teaching. That’s what I’m looking for.

Fight SCIENCE
 

KPM

Senior Master
Joined
Jul 6, 2014
Messages
3,642
Reaction score
992
The best way is to visit and watch training! If they aren't sparring for that particular class ask someone if they do spar and how often. If they say they don't spar, then they are not a "modernized" school!
 

Flying Crane

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 21, 2005
Messages
15,230
Reaction score
4,920
Location
San Francisco
So do I understand correctly that you have no experience in training wing chun? Your only experience is from watching some guy’s YouTube channel?

Yet you have already identified wing chun’s flaws, and how to fix them?

Let me ask: if you already perceive wing chun as flawed, why would you be interested in training it?
 
OP
M

macher

Green Belt
Joined
Apr 2, 2018
Messages
156
Reaction score
44
So do I understand correctly that you have no experience in training wing chun? Your only experience is from watching some guy’s YouTube channel?

Yet you have already identified wing chun’s flaws, and how to fix them?

Let me ask: if you already perceive wing chun as flawed, why would you be interested in training it?

I don’t perceive Wing Chun as flawed. But I do perceive traditional Wing Chun not adapting to the modern fighting climate such as footwork and head movement. What I like about Wing Chun is when you close the distance.
 

Headhunter

Senior Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
4,765
Reaction score
1,598
I don’t perceive Wing Chun as flawed. But I do perceive traditional Wing Chun not adapting to the modern fighting climate such as footwork and head movement. What I like about Wing Chun is when you close the distance.
Modern fighting? Fighting is fighting. People still punch In fights today people still kick in fights today it's all the same. Just go train instead of worrying about all that nonsense
 

Flying Crane

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 21, 2005
Messages
15,230
Reaction score
4,920
Location
San Francisco
I don’t perceive Wing Chun as flawed. But I do perceive traditional Wing Chun not adapting to the modern fighting climate such as footwork and head movement. What I like about Wing Chun is when you close the distance.
I guess I am trying to understand why you have this perception, when you havent even studied it yet.

You’ve watched some guy’s YouTube channel, and he is apparently biased and has his own angle on things. But that does not mean he knows what everyone else in the wing chun world is doing.

Every school is different, even within the same wing chun lineage. Every sifu will have his own unique take on things, to a certain extent. It is not accurate to paint this with such broad strokes, although people certainly do try.

Don’t be fooled by it.

Some schools are junk, that is true enough. But others are not. If you are honestly interested in wing chun, then find a good school and begin training, and throw away your preconceived notions about how you think it ought to be done. Learn it for what it is, and you just might find something that works quite well, once you understand it.
 

Xue Sheng

All weight is underside
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
34,275
Reaction score
9,389
Location
North American Tectonic Plate
I don’t perceive Wing Chun as flawed. But I do perceive traditional Wing Chun not adapting to the modern fighting climate such as footwork and head movement. What I like about Wing Chun is when you close the distance.

Look for a Jeet Kune Do School then. Wing Chun is Wing Chun if it changes its basics it is no longer Wing Chun
 

Martial D

Senior Master
Joined
May 18, 2017
Messages
3,407
Reaction score
1,156
Look for a Jeet Kune Do School then. Wing Chun is Wing Chun if it changes its basics it is no longer Wing Chun

I guess I am trying to understand why you have this perception, when you havent even studied it yet.

You’ve watched some guy’s YouTube channel, and he is apparently biased and has his own angle on things. But that does not mean he knows what everyone else in the wing chun world is doing.

Every school is different, even within the same wing chun lineage. Every sifu will have his own unique take on things, to a certain extent. It is not accurate to paint this with such broad strokes, although people certainly do try.

Don’t be fooled by it.

Some schools are junk, that is true enough. But others are not. If you are honestly interested in wing chun, then find a good school and begin training, and throw away your preconceived notions about how you think it ought to be done. Learn it for what it is, and you just might find something that works quite well, once you understand it.

To be fair, I have been training Wing Chun (admittedly with a few breaks) since 1996 or so, and I mostly agree with never-did-wingchun-guy in terms of the usefulness of "traditional" Wing Chun training methods. Of course there are many schools and teachers that agree and have thusly modernized.

The problem as I see it is the fighting game hasn't remained still while WC, and many other TMA, have been frozen in time for a hundred years or more. Against untrained people or people that fight old timey style, traditional MA is an advantage to be sure, but against people using modern methods it, they, have been proven to not be up to snuff time and time again.

To me though, this is a good thing. If the collective edge isn't getting sharper with time, what are we even doing?

I am currently training MMA 5 days a week purely to improve my WC, and since I have started it has improved dramatically.
 

Danny T

Senior Master
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
4,258
Reaction score
2,293
Location
New Iberia, Louisiana USA
I can't say I understand what 'modern' wc is or even what traditional wc is. My sifu came up in the 60s in Hong Kong. His training at that time included them going out and fighting. They didn't spar they went out got into fights. Then back to training playing with what worked, what didn't work, and why. His sifu would fuss about them fighting but then wanted to know what happened and worked on them getting better. The difference today, as I see it, is the lack of fighting, losing, and figuring out why. So sparring is the next best thing and many wc schools don't spar because that is traditional. WHAT???
Train, Spar or Fight, Learn. Otherwise you really aren't doing wc. Oh and Chi Sao IS NOT sparring or fighting. That is but one drill.
 

Martial D

Senior Master
Joined
May 18, 2017
Messages
3,407
Reaction score
1,156
I can't say I understand what 'modern' wc is or even what traditional wc is. My sifu came up in the 60s in Hong Kong. His training at that time included them going out and fighting. They didn't spar they went out got into fights. Then back to training playing with what worked, what didn't work, and why. His sifu would fuss about them fighting but then wanted to know what happened and worked on them getting better. The difference today, as I see it, is the lack of fighting, losing, and figuring out why. So sparring is the next best thing and many wc schools don't spar because that is traditional. WHAT???
Train, Spar or Fight, Learn. Otherwise you really aren't doing wc. Oh and Chi Sao IS NOT sparring or fighting. That is but one drill.
I can't speak for anyone else, but when I talk about 'traditional' WC training I mean classes that are purely forms, chi sau and solo/cooperative drills. This, in my experience at least, seems to make up the bulk of it.
 

geezer

Grandmaster
MT Mentor
Joined
Oct 20, 2007
Messages
7,364
Reaction score
3,571
Location
Phoenix, AZ
I can't speak for anyone else, but when I talk about 'traditional' WC training I mean classes that are purely forms, chi sau and solo/cooperative drills. This, in my experience at least, seems to make up the bulk of it.

Yep. That's pretty much how our club is. The students are older guys and some have health concerns -- for example one is a heart transplant recipient. They want something more "punchy-fighty" than typical tai chi, but they don't really want to fight. And (this part kinda confuses me) no one like to grapple or do WC sweeps throws. Wierd, because that stuff can be really fun.

Oh well. It's the group we have, and with going on sixty-three and half crippled with old injuries, I accept that. At least I have another 62-year-old crippled training partner I do escrima with who does like to mix it up. When I come limping home all beat up, my wife doesn't understand why I'm smiling. :p
 

geezer

Grandmaster
MT Mentor
Joined
Oct 20, 2007
Messages
7,364
Reaction score
3,571
Location
Phoenix, AZ
BTW I added the above in the interest of honesty. I fully support efforts to keep WC evolving and effective as a fighting art ...but I don't think the activity needs to be the exclusive domain of fighters. Yes, they should be it's heart and soul, and its "laboratory", but there is room for everybody to participate ...so long as we are all honest with ourselves about what we are doing.

Everybody should recognize that there is no magic to kung fu. Of course you have to fight if you want to be a fighter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KPM
OP
M

macher

Green Belt
Joined
Apr 2, 2018
Messages
156
Reaction score
44
I can't say I understand what 'modern' wc is or even what traditional wc is. My sifu came up in the 60s in Hong Kong. His training at that time included them going out and fighting. They didn't spar they went out got into fights. Then back to training playing with what worked, what didn't work, and why. His sifu would fuss about them fighting but then wanted to know what happened and worked on them getting better. The difference today, as I see it, is the lack of fighting, losing, and figuring out why. So sparring is the next best thing and many wc schools don't spar because that is traditional. WHAT???
Train, Spar or Fight, Learn. Otherwise you really aren't doing wc. Oh and Chi Sao IS NOT sparring or fighting. That is but one drill.

I want a school that spars.
 

Flying Crane

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 21, 2005
Messages
15,230
Reaction score
4,920
Location
San Francisco
I want a school that spars.
Then find a school that spars. It isn’t magic. There is no secret about it. That does not dictate whether it is “modernized” or not.

If you want wing chun, then find a school and learn wing chun. If you THINK you know how wing chun should be “improved” then maybe you ought to look for something else because whether you realize it or not, you have already subconsciously written it off as deficient, and you will never be satisfied learning wing chun. You will constantly doubt what you are learning.

In that case, find something else that is a better match for you.

Not everything is a good match for every person. You need to figure out what is best for you. That does not include starting something new while already thinking that you need to do something to “fix” it.
 

Danny T

Senior Master
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
4,258
Reaction score
2,293
Location
New Iberia, Louisiana USA
Here's a novel idea.
Train at whatever wc school you can and go to other gyms and spar.
There are a lot of schools, gyms, whatever that offer open sparring or open mat times. You will get to train and also spar against other non wing chun practitioners.
 

Martial D

Senior Master
Joined
May 18, 2017
Messages
3,407
Reaction score
1,156
I agree with you on many points but I have a question..... proven where time and time again?
Anywhere you see Wing Chun used live really. You can do all the chi sau and drilling you want, but those things will never prepare you for live punches, live distance control, or an opponent that is highly uncooperative to the point of trying to rattle your brains a little..

Nothing prepares you for this except doing it.

And I'm sure you would admit that most WC schools are not, or am mistaken?
 
  • Like
Reactions: KPM

Kung Fu Wang

Sr. Grandmaster
MT Mentor
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
14,041
Reaction score
4,488
Location
Austin, Tx/Shell Beach, Ca
I want a school that spars.
There are many ways to develop dependable MA skill. The sparring is not the only way.

For example, if you can hit my head within your first 20 punches, you win that round. Otherwise, I win that round. Repeat this for 15 rounds and record the daily result. Repeat it for 1 months and record the monthly result.

The reason that I don't like pure sparring because people may be afraid to develop new MA skill. You may spar for 5 years but at the end of the 5th year, your sparring may be no different from what you did on your 1st year.

In my last class, we played a very simple game. If one can obtain a clinch after his opponent's 1st or 2nd punch, he wins that round. Otherwise, he loses that round. Played for 15 rounds, recorded the result, and switched.

The nice thing about this game is you can "test" almost any MA skill.
 
Last edited:

Latest Discussions

Top