Hip and body rotation

Blindside

Grandmaster
Founding Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2001
Messages
5,175
Reaction score
849
Location
Kennewick, WA
The "problem" examples are all good, but the three elements of "proper technique" don't always occur, particularly "set" which if you did every time you threw a technique you would be telegraphing all the time.
 

Kung Fu Wang

Sr. Grandmaster
MT Mentor
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
14,041
Reaction score
4,488
Location
Austin, Tx/Shell Beach, Ca
you would be telegraphing all the time.
Agree! That clip just remind me the following clip that you move your right leg backward before you move it forward.


PRO - This will give you more "momentum".
CON - You just telegraph your intention and it will take twice as much time to finish your move.

1 is always faster than 1,2. If you can make a move in 1 move, you should not make it into 2 moves. There is no argument that the more you can "compress", the more power that you can "release". But in reality, you may not have the luxury to compress "that much".

A simple example, if a mosquito flies in front of you, you try to smash it by your 2 palms, you won't have time to

- rotate your waist back,
- rotate your waist forward,
- use your waist to push your upper body,
- use your upper body to push your shoulder,
- use your shoulder to push your elbow, and
- use your elbow to push your hand.

When your hand can reach out, that mosquito will be long gone.

In

1. training, you may only care about power generation - your waist push your upper body, upper body push shoulder, shoulder push elbow, elbow push hand.
2. fighting, you care about both power and speed generation - your elbow chase your hand, shoulder chase elbow, upper body chase shoulder, waist chase upper body.
 
Last edited:

marques

Master Black Belt
Joined
Jun 7, 2015
Messages
1,187
Reaction score
382
Location
Essex, UK
I was teached without "set".

It is a telegraphic waste of time. Some sparring partners do it (a way too much) in order to gain power (I think...), but it just nullifies everything they do next, since it becomes too obvious and/or too slow. (Sometimes the "set" is slower than a step away/aside or a jab (without "set").

If I need a "set" for some reason it is hidden by a simultaneous (fake?) jab (or something).
 

Bill Mattocks

Sr. Grandmaster
MTS Alumni
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
15,624
Reaction score
4,429
Location
Michigan
I was teached without "set".

It is a telegraphic waste of time. Some sparring partners do it (a way too much) in order to gain power (I think...), but it just nullifies everything they do next, since it becomes too obvious and/or too slow. (Sometimes the "set" is slower than a step away/aside or a jab (without "set").

If I need a "set" for some reason it is hidden by a simultaneous (fake?) jab (or something).

Agreed. A wind up, of arm or hip, invites an immediate attack to a balance point on that side.
 

Flying Crane

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 21, 2005
Messages
15,230
Reaction score
4,920
Location
San Francisco
I don't have a problem with the set, as long as it's understood that the set is an exaggerated movement for training purposes, used to help the body develop the mechanics. It mostly disappears in application.

It's a poor instructional video in that it does not teach how to do the rotation. He only talks about the fact that it is important. No discussion of what the feet and legs are doing, where the rotational power is coming from, etc.

Oh, and when he demonstrated coordinated rotation with his strike, he was not connected.
 

Kung Fu Wang

Sr. Grandmaster
MT Mentor
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
14,041
Reaction score
4,488
Location
Austin, Tx/Shell Beach, Ca
It mostly disappears in application.
The concern is, after that bad habit has been developed, it's hard to remove in application. If you believe in "train as you fight", it's better not to develop that bad habit in the 1st place.

It's much

- harder to generate power through a short distance.
- easier to generate power through a long distance.

Since "long distance" means "more time". In application, you just don't have that extra time. IMO, you should not only depend on long power generation. You should also train short power generation as well.

Here is an example that no extra "hip and body rotation" are added in through training.

 
Last edited:

Flying Crane

Sr. Grandmaster
Joined
Sep 21, 2005
Messages
15,230
Reaction score
4,920
Location
San Francisco
The concern is, after that bad habit has been developed, it's hard to remove in application. If you believe in "train as you fight", it's better not to develop that bad habit in the 1st place.

It's much

- harder to generate power through a short distance.
- easier to generate power through a long distance.

Since "long distance" means "more time". In application, you just don't have that extra time. IMO, you should not only depend on long power generation. You should also train short power generation as well.

Here is an example that no extra "hip and body rotation" are added in through training.

I understand the concern. It depends on how you train. Move big, to become small. If you only move small, you never completely 'get' it.
 

JowGaWolf

Sr. Grandmaster
MT Mentor
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
13,954
Reaction score
5,843
My perspective is that wind ups aren't bad so long as they are part of another technique. The finishing flow of one technique can be the wind up flow of another technique. On the most simple aspect of this is the 1-2 jab. A left hand jab shoots straight out without a wind up, which causes the right hand to naturally draw back. Now the right hand is in a position to be launched as the left hand returns from the jab. There is no need to wind up the right arm because the wind up happened at the same time the left jab went out.

I'm not sure if the guy in the video views the "wind up" the same way, but many of us naturally do this when we run and walk through the swing of our arms.

As for hip body rotation I didn't see any of that discussion. It's like it starts out with twisting the hip and then about punching, because he mentions the "wind up" as being part of the mechanics of the twisting of the hips.

If I want to "wind up" for my right jab then I'll do so by punching with my left arm first. My left lab causes my right arm to draw back which prepares it for a powerful Jab. What I don't want to do is to draw my left arm back to initiate a left jab. Circular kung fu system are full of "wind ups" but the wind up happen during defensive actions or transitioning actions. For example, the momentum of one technique drives the following technique. Or the twisting of my body to avoid a punch now becomes the wind up for my counter.
 

Kung Fu Wang

Sr. Grandmaster
MT Mentor
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
14,041
Reaction score
4,488
Location
Austin, Tx/Shell Beach, Ca
I understand the concern. It depends on how you train. Move big, to become small. If you only move small, you never completely 'get' it.
If we consider

beginner level training - move big.
advance level training - move small.

When should one change from move big to move small? after 1 year? after 5 years? after 10 years?
 

Kung Fu Wang

Sr. Grandmaster
MT Mentor
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
14,041
Reaction score
4,488
Location
Austin, Tx/Shell Beach, Ca
My perspective is that wind ups aren't bad so long as they are part of another technique. ... If I want to "wind up" for my right jab then I'll do so by punching with my left arm first.
It's called, "hide your preparation in your previous move", or "the end of your previous move is the beginning of your next move".

The cross stance that you have right leg forward with left hand forward is a good example. Your right hand has already finished the "compress" and ready to "release" any time.

 

CDR_Glock

Yellow Belt
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
24
Reaction score
3
As a golfer, I find hip rotation, followed by shoulder and then arm movement to give more momentum. As I apply it in martial arts, that type of sequential movement for me is there but much less pronounced as the instructional video demonstrated. In his "ideal" way, I feel it was a good illustration but it was not enough to emphasize how to deliver the power behind the technique.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

Latest Discussions

Top