Yes, it should. Firearm use is not in the curriculum until black belt, so it's just what we have done on our own. It would be a good crash introduction. our training pistols are rubber with the trigger guard removed. Long guns are 2x4 cutouts of whatever was laying around at the time.
Why? I always thought a tap and rack once should do it.
Why remove the trigger guard? If you develop a little control, there are some fun things you can do with it. That bit of control gives you a few more options in some cases. ( I can take his finger off while he is standing there, or I can put him on the ground first and then collect the finger... It's so much more fun to give someone the finger, when it's their finger
)
Why remove the trigger guard? If you develop a little control, there are some fun things you can do with it. That bit of control gives you a few more options in some cases. ( I can take his finger off while he is standing there, or I can put him on the ground first and then collect the finger... It's so much more fun to give someone the finger, when it's their finger
If you ever want to try your stuff against simunitions, those guns have trigger guards... you will want the other guy to have some control, as the possibility of getting shot by simunition rounds, ups the speed and power. This is where you really need that feel and control to prevent injury.
When teaching beginners, no trigger guard or no finger. When working with higher levels, we like to work on speed. Which means it's hard to stop as soon as the shooter's index finger strains.Why remove the trigger guard? If you develop a little control, there are some fun things you can do with it. That bit of control gives you a few more options in some cases. ( I can take his finger off while he is standing there, or I can put him on the ground first and then collect the finger... It's so much more fun to give someone the finger, when it's their finger
If you ever want to try your stuff against simunitions, those guns have trigger guards... you will want the other guy to have some control, as the possibility of getting shot by simunition rounds, ups the speed and power. This is where you really need that feel and control to prevent injury.
Big trouble. Not a whole lot changes, there's just a lot less room for error. I have limited techniques because at least one hand is controlling the weapon, and only so many things while being able to control the weapon and not shoot myself while incapacitating my opponent.
Should...usually...but in the heat of battle double feeds happen.
In that case, I have a nice little club.
And I stated; "then the firearm becomes a blunt object."
This is becoming more and more a consideration in the general "firearms for self defense" community. Mike Seeklander is a big advocate and has some free stuff available. It's mostly based around a BJJ base (he's a big BJJ fan, practices regularly and even has a "private coach"). You can get a free month at his website while he's still offering the deal. Lots of vids and articles. Good stuff from what I've heard. New Home Page | American Warrior Society
That depends on the nature of the malfunction. A Tap-Rack-Bang will work for a lot of stuff, but I've seen jams that would not fix from a TR. Further, not all ejection failures can be completely fixed without moving the gun so that gravity can pull the case or cartridge out. This is a luxury you may not have when rolling. I'd also like to point out that a TR is generally a two-handed technique. You may not want to give up use of both of your hands while rolling. I suppose you could try to rack on the belt, but I'm not overly fond of this technique and I'd particularly frown on it while rolling. If it jams, just pistol whip him with it. You can crush skulls and break bones easily enough.
