PDA

View Full Version : Would you consider BJJ a low impact art?



revfidel
12-27-2010, 08:13 PM
Hello,

For those BJJ practitioners, would you consider BJJ a low impact art as oppossed to Judo (which to me seems to take a toll on you body as you age). I am now 50 and would like to begin training in a grappling system. I have a little experience with Judo (I took some lessons when I was young), but have back and ankle problems which prevent me from taking it again. From what I have seen, BJJ might be something I can practice as it seems to be lower impact than Judo. I would appreciate any comments, especially those students around my age.

Thanx, Revfidel

Touch Of Death
12-27-2010, 10:15 PM
There is plenty of impact in BJJ.
Sean

Steve
12-27-2010, 10:52 PM
I don't know how bad your back is, but mine is pretty jacked. I have a herniated L5 that is very gimpy. When it gets inflamed, it creates a very painful cascade of issues that keeps me from even being able to drive for about a week.

I don't know what your specific physical limitations are, but most people who watch themselves on takedowns, know their limits and are smart about their training do just fine. Finding a good school where there isn't a lot of ego or machismo and you should be okay.

It IS a contact sport but the nature of sparring on the mat is that if you feel you're in trouble, you tap and reset.

revfidel
12-29-2010, 12:59 PM
Thanx for your responses. SteveBBJ, my back is not as bad as yours, but if you can roll with your condition, I will probably be OK as long as I know my limitations. I am amazed at the dedication of people such as yourself to keep working out regardless of your injuries. I will speak to the instructor before starting.

Brian R. VanCise
01-01-2011, 06:49 PM
BJJ is great and does not have near as heavy an impact nature as Judo but..... it is hard on the joints when trained with intensity. ;)

msmitht
10-02-2011, 01:19 AM
Lol...definately not a low impact art unless you are doing a class without free training.

Buka
10-02-2011, 09:16 AM
I disagree. I find good BJJ a less impact art than Judo and most good striking arts.

msmitht
10-02-2011, 11:59 AM
I disagree. I find good BJJ a less impact art than Judo and most good striking arts.then you either don't do bjj or only do the non rolling classes(which means you have technique but can't use it). In REAL bjj we roll every class. In the last 9 years that I have done bjj I have received more injuries than in 30 yeard of wtf tkd. 3 dislocated fingers, 2 broken toes, a partially torn labrum, 2 concussions, an avulsion fracture of the semitendonosis muscle(hamstring), a "popped" elbow or two and I can not count how many times I have been slammed on a takedown. I admit that now it is easier to controlthe lower ranks and it is more of a chess match(as a brown belt) but I would never call bjj low impact.

frank raud
10-02-2011, 02:13 PM
Hello,

For those BJJ practitioners, would you consider BJJ a low impact art as oppossed to Judo (which to me seems to take a toll on you body as you age). I am now 50 and would like to begin training in a grappling system. I have a little experience with Judo (I took some lessons when I was young), but have back and ankle problems which prevent me from taking it again. From what I have seen, BJJ might be something I can practice as it seems to be lower impact than Judo. I would appreciate any comments, especially those students around my age.

Thanx, Revfidel Compared to judo, where the major focus is on throws, BJJ is has less impact. That does not make it a fluffly bunny art. Of course, I'm 50 and started judo a few years ago, so take my opinion with a grain of salt.

msmitht
10-02-2011, 04:59 PM
Compared to judo, where the major focus is on throws, BJJ is has less impact. That does not make it a fluffly bunny art. Of course, I'm 50 and started judo a few years ago, so take my opinion with a grain of salt.agreed. Less takedowns=less slamming. However being frogged out(facedown, opp has hooks and is flattening you) by a 230 pound marine who is 15 years younger can cause even more damage. A popular position called "knee on stomach" has caused more ribcage/sternum/bowel injuries than I can count.

Buka
10-02-2011, 10:06 PM
then you either don't do bjj or only do the non rolling classes(which means you have technique but can't use it). In REAL bjj we roll every class. In the last 9 years that I have done bjj I have received more injuries than in 30 yeard of wtf tkd. 3 dislocated fingers, 2 broken toes, a partially torn labrum, 2 concussions, an avulsion fracture of the semitendonosis muscle(hamstring), a "popped" elbow or two and I can not count how many times I have been slammed on a takedown. I admit that now it is easier to controlthe lower ranks and it is more of a chess match(as a brown belt) but I would never call bjj low impact.

I don't do BJJ as much as I used to, but I don't do anything as much as I used to :) I'm over sixty and been actively practicing, full time, for over forty years. My main instructors in BJJ were Rickson Gracie, his first Black Belt Romolo Barros and a little with Relson Gracie. But my main focus was in striking arts, primarily Karate, boxing and kickboxing. I've spent more time rolling in BJJ and more time sparring in stand up than I can possibly remember. I competed for over twenty years in every damn thing, including BJJ tournaments. Hell, I've LOST more matches than a lot of folks have even watched.
But if I had to do it over again from the git go, I'm make BJJ my primary style. Yes, I've been slammed and broken in Jits, but in the long run - which is the ONLY thing someone my age looks at, BJJ is far gentler on the body and most important, your SKILLS are retained longer at a high level.

As for "non rolling" classes, I've never seen or been in a non rolling class, in fact I've never heard of one before, so I have no idea how to comment on that.
Pardon me now while I go harumph and grumble. :)

Steve
10-03-2011, 12:04 AM
I'd agree with Buka. While my little toes look like tiny vienna sausages, and my right ear is a little puffier than it once was, I've trained largely injury free for going on 6 years now. My back issues are chronic and recurring, but I'm 100% confident that the fitness and core strength I have from jits helps more than it hurts.

It's true that injuries do happen. I've waited too long to tap on key locks and popped my elbow, but that's never kept me out of class for more than a couple of days.

In my somewhat limited experience, the knees are the most vulnerable thing in Jiu Jitsu. In training, I've seen one serious ankle injury. I've seen several knee injuries. Have to watch the knees. Sometimes, in the tangle, guys start torquing around. Usually, from what I've seen, injuries tend occur TO upper belts, usually when a new guy is spazzing out and the upper belt is trying to protect him from himself.

Gentle Fist
10-30-2011, 06:36 AM
As stated above BJJ has far less impact than Judo but then again so does every other martial art.... Is there a martial art with the same or more impact than judo? Sombo/sambo maybe?

msmitht
11-09-2011, 09:19 PM
Impact is not just getting slammed on the mat. Boxing is a high impact martial art as is real TKD (the non watered down Olympic style which allows KO's), Kyokushin Karate and Muay Thai.