View Full Version : Working on the older material
terryl965
12-10-2009, 07:15 PM
Dan Anderson posted some video of him doing some of the older forms form Korea like sipsu, Bassia and so forth. I was wondering how many of us old timers still go over those form form time to time? I really like them alot better than the Tae Gueks but that is just me. Looking forward to some great converstation on why or why not any of us do them anymore.
For me it is hard to break old habits like deeper and wider stances since they really came from Okinawa and Shotokan in the beginning, I know the principle behind the newer forms and so on but the simplicity of the Kata was so beyond what we do today and they always had alot of input on techs behind them.
chungdokwan123
12-11-2009, 05:47 AM
[quote].......older forms form Korea like sipsu, Bassia and so forth. Research links please! This sounds interesting!
IcemanSK
12-11-2009, 09:59 AM
Bassai Dai (aka Pal Sek in Korean) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Adlq7KnjhqI&feature=related
Sorry, this is all I could find quickly. This is a good version of Bassai.
dancingalone
12-11-2009, 10:04 AM
Terry, do you think it's contradictory for a modern taekwondoist to work this material? Why bother if your one-steps or your free-sparring don't even begin to resemble the ideas codified within the old forms?
Manny
12-11-2009, 11:40 AM
Bakc in the 80's we in Jido Kwan performed Palgwes, I learned them all from 1 to Koryo, however one year before my BB test we change to Taeguks patters so i had to memorice all taeguks in one year to do my BB test.
Since then (1986) I haven't practiced Palgwes so I can't recall them, I only have some backflashses but I really like the most the palgwes than the Taeguks, I feel the Palgwes are more beautiful but Taeguks are bettre to memorice.
I would like in the future relearn the palgwes as a personal thing.
Manny
terryl965
12-11-2009, 01:28 PM
Terry, do you think it's contradictory for a modern taekwondoist to work this material? Why bother if your one-steps or your free-sparring don't even begin to resemble the ideas codified within the old forms?
I do them just because it was the ways of my GM and my family does them to please me I suppose. I have only a few students that I even brother teaching the old ways.
Flying Crane
12-11-2009, 01:31 PM
Terry, do you think it's contradictory for a modern taekwondoist to work this material? Why bother if your one-steps or your free-sparring don't even begin to resemble the ideas codified within the old forms?
Or might the problem be that the one-steps and free-sparring departed the foundation that the old forms gave you?
dancingalone
12-11-2009, 02:16 PM
Or might the problem be that the one-steps and free-sparring departed the foundation that the old forms gave you?
I've seen many one-steps where the counter to a punch is a block followed by a punch and then a spinning back or side kick. This would seem to go against the application theory I learned myself where the goal is to CLOSE with the opponent rather than disengage. Just an example... Ideally of course, all the drills/one-steps/sparring/forms/self-defense should reinforce one another conceptually.
terryl965
12-11-2009, 02:21 PM
I've seen many one-steps where the counter to a punch is a block followed by a punch and then a spinning back or side kick. This would seem to go against the application theory I learned myself where the goal is to CLOSE with the opponent rather than disengage. Just an example... Ideally of course, all the drills/one-steps/sparring/forms/self-defense should reinforce one another conceptually.
True but if you was able to give some distance between you and the attracker by using a kick, it would allow you time to get away in alot of cases. Now with that being said I believe in CQC approach as well.
dancingalone
12-11-2009, 02:53 PM
True but if you was able to give some distance between you and the attracker by using a kick, it would allow you time to get away in alot of cases. Now with that being said I believe in CQC approach as well.
Well, I don't know what the intent is with the Taeguk forms, etc. However the older forms likely never had any idea of disengagement and escape embodied within them. It's pretty much all 'destroy your opponent'. Very unsanitized and unvarnished stuff compared to self-defense taught today.
terryl965
12-11-2009, 03:13 PM
Well, I don't know what the intent is with the Taeguk forms, etc. However the older forms likely never had any idea of disengagement and escape embodied within them. It's pretty much all 'destroy your opponent'. Very unsanitized and unvarnished stuff compared to self-defense taught today.
I can only agree, it had a barberic approach to fighting. I can see you and I pretty much agree alot with application.
garrisons2
12-11-2009, 05:53 PM
Manny, here is a web site that shows Palgwe videos......slightly different than my GM teaches them. to my knowledge, only a few in my area Chicago do Palgwe forms
http://www.899kick.com/colorbelt.html
DMcHenry
12-11-2009, 06:23 PM
I still do the older form sets, but my base is TangSooDo and those forms are starndard.
rmclain
12-14-2009, 03:19 PM
I'm not an old-timer, but these are forms all students practice in Chayon-Ryu. But, I'm not a TKD person and may not fall into the respondents you were targeting with the discussion.
I just tested and was promoted to 5th Dan in Chayon-Ryu by Grandmaster Kim Soo. So, my new form requirements for the new rank are: Jinsoo, Oh Ship Sa Bo, Ship Pal, and General Jua Bu CHong's Bong Sul Hyung.
R. McLain
Dan Anderson posted some video of him doing some of the older forms form Korea like sipsu, Bassia and so forth. I was wondering how many of us old timers still go over those form form time to time? I really like them alot better than the Tae Gueks but that is just me. Looking forward to some great converstation on why or why not any of us do them anymore.
For me it is hard to break old habits like deeper and wider stances since they really came from Okinawa and Shotokan in the beginning, I know the principle behind the newer forms and so on but the simplicity of the Kata was so beyond what we do today and they always had alot of input on techs behind them.
xfighter88
12-15-2009, 08:31 AM
Or might the problem be that the one-steps and free-sparring departed the foundation that the old forms gave you?
Ditto that man
Miles
12-15-2009, 01:28 PM
I work on the pyung-ahn series, bassai, and naihanchi hyung but not consistently. I don't teach these to my students as I'd prefer that they have a deeper understanding of the required material before working with supplemental information.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.