View Full Version : Sifu Philip Holder
Hey Guys,
Okay, I've been taking karate/kickboxing for most of my chilhood and teen years. I had friends who dabbled in White Crane Kung Fu and MoyYat Wing Chun and were kind enough to teach me alot of the basics. I had been taking formal training for some time in MoyYat until my Sifu closed the school for certain reasons. I have of late been into the William Cheung Style of Wing Chun but couldn't find anybody close enough to my area of NY to commit to with my work and school schedule. So I have been visiting and visiting schools and sitting with teachers and to be honest the best spot so far is a school by one of Philip Holders old students. These guys are really good and mix in Chin Na, Grappling and Kickboxing to make it more adaptable in different fight ranges.
The questions is...What is the deal with Philip Holder and why doesnt anybody like this guy. He completed all of Master Cheungs training ( any one of the Masters in the Traditional Wing Chun system vouch for it... they even say he was one of the first to complete both MoyYat/ TWC with high honors). But everytime I search Sifu Holder, somebody is bashing the guy like he's a scrub.
Someone shed some light for me please.
hungfistron
12-06-2007, 11:23 AM
I'll have to look him up, I never heard of him...
KamonGuy2
12-10-2007, 07:38 AM
Hey Guys,
The questions is...What is the deal with Philip Holder and why doesnt anybody like this guy. He completed all of Master Cheungs training ( any one of the Masters in the Traditional Wing Chun system vouch for it... they even say he was one of the first to complete both MoyYat/ TWC with high honors). But everytime I search Sifu Holder, somebody is bashing the guy like he's a scrub.
Someone shed some light for me please.
I think the highlighted sentence above explains a lot
William Cheung is a very dubious 'master' of the style
He makes outrageous claims that have insulted many of the martial arts world and also took sole responsibility for Bruce Lee's training
The Bozteppi/Cheung fight speaks volumes...
The techniques (from what I have encountered by some of his American teachers) in his schools are flawed and not very realistic for use to an average civilian
I always keep an open mind about someone or their school until I experience their training and the two instructors who I trained with under the Cheung banner blabbed on that their system was the 'true wing chun'
Personally, training is training and Sifus should be humble. I have trained for a long time but still have a very long way to go.
And mentioned in my other post, one of Cheungs instructors in Baltimore had a real lousy attitude
almost a ghost
12-10-2007, 10:11 AM
Wow, this is a name I haven't heard in a few years. Some fellow students and myself came up on his old webpage a few years ago, which has since expired.
1. He's calling himself a "Grandmaster", or at least was.
2. He's putting books out with techniques like these:
http://www.wingchun.com/img/holder.gif
http://www.wingchun.com/img/HoldHook.gif
http://www.wingchun.com/img/phkickd.gif
Gurokevin
01-20-2008, 07:15 PM
William Cheung? Philip Holder? RUN FOR YOU LIVESSSSSS!!!!!!!!
This style of WC absolutely sucks. I started in this style under a Cheung guy. I then moved to WingTsun, and then finally to the Wong Shun Leung way of Wing Chun. The Cheung and especialy the Holder people could not fight their way out of a paper bag, let alone a real fight. And William Cheung is just a lier, plain and simple. I went to one of his seminars years back, and left half way through when he started to make some ridiculous claims.
geezer
01-21-2008, 02:48 AM
William Cheung? Philip Holder? RUN FOR YOU LIVESSSSSS!!!!!!!!
This style of WC absolutely sucks. I started in this style under a Cheung guy. I then moved to WingTsun, and then finally to the Wong Shun Leung way of Wing Chun. The Cheung and especialy the Holder people could not fight their way out of a paper bag, let alone a real fight. And William Cheung is just a lier, plain and simple. I went to one of his seminars years back, and left half way through when he started to make some ridiculous claims.
C'mon Gurokev--tell us how you really feel! But seriously, rather than just bashing these guys, could you give specific examples of how these guys didn't measure up. Otherwise things get really political and nasty. And I say this as an old WT guy, so you know where I'm coming from. Nuff sed.
Gurokevin
01-21-2008, 12:23 PM
I really don't mean to get political. I just can't stand people who say that they have learned the "Real" way of doing whatever. Like William claims to have learned the "Real" wing chun from GM Yip Man. Its just BS. He has completely bastardized their wing chun and convinced good people that it is the one and only true wing chun. And Holder has just made it worse by making it more of a crappy system. And as far as their fighting ability goes, most of them do not train for reality. They do endless sequences of techniques which in my opinion (and Sifu Wong Shun Leung) is pointless, and there chi sao is not very good either. They leave themselves open way to much. I know this from personal experience. And 99% of the other people that I have talked to that do their styles say that they don't even spar. And if they do they use a lot of rules. I do not see a point in doing martial arts if you do not train to really fight. Anyways, I do not like either of their styles.
If I offend anyone, please understand that it is not my intention to do so.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.8 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.