View Full Version : Because Okinawa is..


47MartialMan
04-12-2005, 12:04 AM
Because Okinawa is considered part of Japan's prefecture, is Karate still considered as a Japanese art?

Andrew Green
04-12-2005, 12:10 AM
Depends who you ask...

Okinawa was not always a Japanese Prefecture. It has a different history, dialect and culture. At different points it was independant, Chinese, Japaneses, etc.

So how about Hawaiian fire dancing and belly dancing, are those "American" arts?

After the Native Americans found Columbus did the peace pipe and medicine wheel become European traditions?

47MartialMan
04-12-2005, 12:13 AM
Depends who you ask...

Okinawa was not always a Japanese Prefecture. It has a different history, dialect and culture. At different points it was independant, Chinese, Japaneses, etc.

So how about Hawaiian fire dancing and belly dancing, are those "American" arts?

After the Native Americans found Columbus did the peace pipe and medicine wheel become European traditions?
Yes, I had a Hawaiian friend whose family believe that the US took over their homeland.

But as you stated it is still called Hawaiian Dancing, etc,,,,

arnisador
04-12-2005, 01:15 AM
Yes, just like a luau would be described as Hawaiian, not American, I'd call Karate as originally developed Okinawan, not Japanese.

However, I'd call Shotokan, Wado-Ryu, etc., Japanese.

47MartialMan
04-12-2005, 01:21 AM
Yes, just like a luau would be described as Hawaiian, not American, I'd call Karate as originally developed Okinawan, not Japanese.

However, I'd call Shotokan, Wado-Ryu, etc., Japanese.
So the distinction is of place or the founder?

arnisador
04-12-2005, 01:25 AM
Well, it's only fair to give credit where it's due, no?

In addition, the Japanese styles of Karate are noticeably different from the Okinawan styles.

47MartialMan
04-12-2005, 01:48 AM
Well, it's only fair to give credit where it's due, no?

In addition, the Japanese styles of Karate are noticeably different from the Okinawan styles.
Yes, but others view TKD as Shotokan or Japanese based and not Korean. Is this fair to state that TKD is not Korean?

Are we speaking in terms of origin, place, or founder?

Andrew Green
04-12-2005, 02:10 AM
Yes, but others view TKD as Shotokan or Japanese based and not Korean. Is this fair to state that TKD is not Korean?

Are we speaking in terms of origin, place, or founder?
Wonder how many Japanese practice TKD?

Nah, usually that is just Shotokan practitioners that like to feel superior to others... ;)

RRouuselot
04-12-2005, 02:16 AM
Wonder how many Japanese practice TKD?

Actually there are a large number of Japanese that practice TKD.

Andrew Green
04-12-2005, 02:26 AM
Actually there are a large number of Japanese that practice TKD.
ok... wonder how many would if it wasn't an Olympic sport...

RRouuselot
04-12-2005, 02:31 AM
ok... wonder how many would if it wasn't an Olympic sport...

I am wondering how many people world wide would study it if it wasn't an Olympic sport........

47MartialMan
04-12-2005, 02:44 AM
Wonder how many Japanese practice TKD?

Nah, usually that is just Shotokan practitioners that like to feel superior to others... ;)Yes, and many other Japanese martial art practitioners.
Many people studied TKD long before it became a Olympic sport.

maunakumu
04-12-2005, 05:41 PM
Yes, but others view TKD as Shotokan or Japanese based and not Korean. Is this fair to state that TKD is not Korean?

Are we speaking in terms of origin, place, or founder?

TKD borrows alot from Shotokan in the same sense that Shotokan borrowed alot from Okinawan-te.

clfsean
04-12-2005, 06:57 PM
TKD borrows alot from Shotokan in the same sense that Shotokan borrowed alot from Okinawan-te.
Borrowed?? Wow... that's forgiving.. :boing2:

IMHO & experience if it weren't for JMA, there'd be no KMA around today... Olympics or not.

RRouuselot ... please clean a space out in your PM box. I've got an off line question for you please.

Andrew Green
04-12-2005, 07:11 PM
Borrowed?? Wow... that's forgiving.. :boing2:

Now they are two very distinct arts, so I'd say it is accurate.

Kung Fu began as a series of excercises taught to Monks by an "outsider", So should we say that Kung fu is not really Chinese? No, it borrowed, branched off and found its own feet to stand on. Same as TKD.

RRouuselot
04-12-2005, 07:14 PM
Borrowed?? Wow... that's forgiving.. :boing2:

IMHO & experience if it weren't for JMA, there'd be no KMA around today... Olympics or not.

RRouuselot ... please clean a space out in your PM box. I've got an off line question for you please.

Korean = Jap./Oki.

Tang Soo Do = Karate Do (old kara kanji)

TKD = Shotokan

Hapkido = Aikido (They use the exact same kanji to write it in Jap. And Kor.)

Yudo = Judo

Kumdo = Kendo

RRouuselot
04-12-2005, 07:16 PM
Now they are two very distinct arts, so I'd say it is accurate.

Kung Fu began as a series of excercises taught to Monks by an "outsider", So should we say that Kung fu is not really Chinese? No, it borrowed, branched off and found its own feet to stand on. Same as TKD.

Those monks expanded on what they were taught that went way beyond the depth and scope of the original art they were exposed to.

The arts I listed in my last post have not.

clfsean
04-12-2005, 07:45 PM
Kung Fu began as a series of excercises taught to Monks by an "outsider", So should we say that Kung fu is not really Chinese? No, it borrowed, branched off and found its own feet to stand on. Same as TKD.
Well specifically you're talking about the legend of Tamo & the Songshan Shaolin Monks. Problem with that is there were already martial arts being practiced in China, Shuai Jiao as an example from the steppes of Mongolia, before then. That's one specific legend regarding it.

Kung Fu is Chinese.

Taekwondo is Korean-ized Shotokan.

Andrew Green
04-12-2005, 08:04 PM
TKD = Shotokan

Yup, that prooves it right there...?


All countries have martial arts, Korea was no exception. There was martial arts practiced there before the Japanese Occupation.

TKD may have began as modified Shotokan, but since then it has changed. It has different forms, different techniques and different competition rules. It even went on to become an Olympic sport.

While I don't agree with attempts to rewrite it's history, it does have one that goes beyond Shotokan.

I'd say there are a lot more differences between Shotokan and TKD then Okinawan karate and Shotokan, and right up there with Okinawan karate and certain forms of Kung fu from which it originated. Yet, Okinawan karate is Okinawan not Chinese, Shotokan is Japanese not Okinawan and TKD is Korean, not Japanese.

RRouuselot
04-12-2005, 08:34 PM
Yup, that prooves it right there...?


All countries have martial arts, Korea was no exception. There was martial arts practiced there before the Japanese Occupation.

TKD may have began as modified Shotokan, but since then it has changed. It has different forms, different techniques and different competition rules. It even went on to become an Olympic sport.

While I don't agree with attempts to rewrite it's history, it does have one that goes beyond Shotokan.

I'd say there are a lot more differences between Shotokan and TKD then Okinawan karate and Shotokan, and right up there with Okinawan karate and certain forms of Kung fu from which it originated. Yet, Okinawan karate is Okinawan not Chinese, Shotokan is Japanese not Okinawan and TKD is Korean, not Japanese.
Oh there is no doubt it has changed from Shotokan to whatever it is now, but for what reasons?

Was the change motivated by martial necessity or by Ultra nationalistic pride?

Okinawa te did not solely come from Chinese Chuan Fa. Chinese arts were blended with already existing Okinawan arts which is why outside of a few styles like Goju and Uechi you will find hardly any kata that are similar between Okinawan and Chinese arts.

arnisador
04-12-2005, 08:45 PM
TKD borrows alot from Shotokan in the same sense that Shotokan borrowed alot from Okinawan-te.
Yes, and I certainly consider TKD Korean despite this. Everything comes from something!

47MartialMan
04-12-2005, 09:46 PM
Everything comes from something!
How true!

maunakumu
04-12-2005, 10:22 PM
The arts I listed in my last post have not.

In which ways do you think they have not changed?

I see TKDists doing kicks that I never did in Shotokan. TSD has such a wide blend of techniques that it clearly has outgrown its roots.

RRouuselot
04-12-2005, 10:33 PM
1) In which ways do you think they have not changed?

2) I see TKDists doing kicks that I never did in Shotokan.
3) TSD has such a wide blend of techniques that it clearly has outgrown its roots. 1) Yudo/Judo & Kumdo/Kendo for example follow the same basic rules.
2) I see kicks in Shotokan that I don't see in Okinawan styles.
3) From what I have seen I think TSD has, to some extent, gone back to it's "Okinawan root" instead of sticking with the "Japanese" style of karate they were originally taught.

maunakumu
04-12-2005, 10:45 PM
3) From what I have seen I think TSD has, to some extent, gone back to it's "Okinawan root" instead of sticking with the "Japanese" style of karate they were originally taught.

There are two teachers of Uechi Ryu in my area. One of them I know is very good. Would you recommend looking into this art in order to explore the Okinawan - TSD connection?

I don't know much about Uechi Ryu, but I think that you mentioned that it was Okinawan...

Andrew Green
04-12-2005, 10:54 PM
There are two teachers of Uechi Ryu in my area. One of them I know is very good. Would you recommend looking into this art in order to explore the Okinawan - TSD connection?

I don't know much about Uechi Ryu, but I think that you mentioned that it was Okinawan...
Uechi ryu wouldn't have too much connection to Tang Soo Do, different branch of Okinawan Karate.

You'd be better off looking at styles that trace back to Anko Itosu, and even other styles from the "Shuri" region. Uechi ryu is much more kung-fuish.

RRouuselot
04-12-2005, 11:00 PM
There are two teachers of Uechi Ryu in my area. One of them I know is very good. Would you recommend looking into this art in order to explore the Okinawan - TSD connection?

I don't know much about Uechi Ryu, but I think that you mentioned that it was Okinawan...
Not really. I would say look into a traditional Okinawan Shorinryu type dojo. The kata will be mnore similar.
Where are you located by the way?

maunakumu
04-12-2005, 11:05 PM
Not really. I would say look into a traditional Okinawan Shorinryu type dojo. The kata will be mnore similar.
Where are you located by the way?

Superior, WI.

The Uechi Ryu senior instructor up here died in a car crash. It was a real tragedy. Julius Scott was Old School and we all miss him. His students carry on his tradition though.

My dojang is actually in the same building that Mr. Scott taught in for decades...

RRouuselot
04-12-2005, 11:10 PM
Superior, WI.

The Uechi Ryu senior instructor up here died in a car crash. It was a real tragedy. Julius Scott was Old School and we all miss him. His students carry on his tradition though.

My dojang is actually in the same building that Mr. Scott taught in for decades...
I just sent you 3 names of folks to contact.
Let me know how it goes.

maunakumu
04-12-2005, 11:21 PM
I just sent you 3 names of folks to contact.
Let me know how it goes.

Thank you, sir. :asian:

arnisador
04-12-2005, 11:34 PM
Uechi ryu wouldn't have too much connection to Tang Soo Do, different branch of Okinawan Karate.

You'd be better off looking at styles that trace back to Anko Itosu, and even other styles from the "Shuri" region. Uechi ryu is much more kung-fuish.
Yes, Uechi is very different from the others. It's Chinese roots are relatively recent. Intersting system, but it focuses on things like the one-knuckle punch and kicking with the knuckles of the toes (!) and isn't very similar at all to TKD and TSD.

Do a search on Uechi in the Karate forum for more info.

TimoS
04-13-2005, 02:22 AM
While I don't agree with attempts to rewrite it's history, it does have one that goes beyond Shotokan.

Okay, this got me curious. What part of TKD history do you think goes beyond Shotokan ? As I've understood it, the official rewritten history goes something like TKD being based Taekyon (not sure about the spelling), but that story apparently has quite a few holes in it

Andrew Green
04-13-2005, 02:34 AM
the official rewritten history goes something like TKD being based Taekyon (not sure about the spelling), but that story apparently has quite a few holes in it
Well, there is very likely a Taekyon influence, but TKD does not date back 2000 years without any connection to Shotokan...

The whole getting into the Olympics was a rather large thing that SHotokan had nothing to do with.

A lot of Korean culture was lost durring the Japanese occupation, not just martial arts. After the Japanese left they tried to rebuild there culture as best they could, using what was there from before that could be remembered and modifying what the Japanese had left behind to there culture.

Truthfully I don't think it is at all fair to tell a culture that they have no culture of there own because so many years ago they where occupied by another country / culture and had it forced on them.

TKD is different, it was adapted from what could be remembered combined with what was available to create something unique, and Korean.

RRouuselot
04-13-2005, 03:07 AM
Well, there is very likely a Taekyon influence, but TKD does not date back 2000 years without any connection to Shotokan...


The TKD I have seen in Korea and the US used Shotokan kata as it's core curriculum.

In fact I saw very little training that didn’t look like it came from shotokan. The one difference I did see was emphasis on kicks….and high ones at that. The kata were the same basic kata but done a little “bouncier”. Other than that there is not much difference except maybe the commands that were given in Korean.

I have noticed also that some Koreans do NOT like it when you say something about TKD coming from Japan. Very sensitive historical point for them.

Some have been down right “ultra right wingers” about TKD being a “pure Korean” art. Maybe they figure National Pride gives them the right to re-write some of their martial history.

Hell the Japanese are just as bad……they think Karate is a Japanese invention like Judo and Kendo.

Starting around the 1920’s the Japanese Government forbid the use of the Okinawan languages (there are 3 main languages in Okinawa) and if caught using it you would be punished.

This might also be of interest, in Okinawa dojo there are not that many names for techniques. These names and instructions have been “Japanified”. Much of the etiquette in the dojo is also from Japanese culture and not Okinawa too.

TimoS
04-13-2005, 03:59 AM
Hell the Japanese are just as bad??they think Karate is a Japanese invention like Judo and Kendo.


But on the other hand, hasn't Okinawa been part of Japan for quite some time already ? Especially during the formation of well, at least most karate styles. So in that sense they can rightfully say that it is japanese invention :)

I am, of course, aware that japanese and okinawan culture are quite separate from each other, but I just happen to be bored at work and this is an interesting topic to discuss :)

RRouuselot
04-13-2005, 05:10 AM
1) But on the other hand, hasn't Okinawa been part of Japan for quite some time already ? Especially during the formation of well, at least most karate styles. So in that sense they can rightfully say that it is japanese invention :)

I am, of course, aware that japanese and okinawan culture are quite separate from each other, but I just happen to be bored at work and this is an interesting topic to discuss :) 1) There was no knowledge of karate in Japan until 1921. Formal instruction didn't happen in Japan until several years later. Even then it was not all that popular and there were very few teachers from Okinawa in Japan at that time. Japanese had little or no influence on karate in Okinawa.

TimoS
04-13-2005, 05:19 AM
1) There was no knowledge of karate in Japan until 1921. Formal instruction didn't happen in Japan until several years later. Even then it was not all that popular and there were very few teachers from Okinawa in Japan at that time. Japanese had little or no influence on karate in Okinawa.

Oh yes, that is of course true, I was just arguing (for arguments sake) that wasn't Okinawa part of Japan even prior to 1921, so in that sense it could be said to be japanese.

RRouuselot
04-13-2005, 07:38 AM
Oh yes, that is of course true, I was just arguing (for arguments sake) that wasn't Okinawa part of Japan even prior to 1921, so in that sense it could be said to be japanese.
If I am not mistaken they were “officially” a prefecture (state) of Japan in 1879 but were still a tributary state of China until the first part of the 1900’s.

arnisador
04-13-2005, 08:54 PM
If I am not mistaken they were “officially” a prefecture (state) of Japan in 1879 but were still a tributary state of China until the first part of the 1900’s.
How did this work? Didn't the Japanese depose the Okinawan royal family in the 1880s? Who paid the tribute to China, then--the Japanese govt.?

RRouuselot
04-13-2005, 09:08 PM
How did this work? Didn't the Japanese depose the Okinawan royal family in the 1880s? Who paid the tribute to China, then--the Japanese govt.?
As a result of the Japanese invasion of 1609 the king of Okinawa was taken to Edo (Tokyo) for his own “protection”, read held prisoner.

He was taken to some part of southern Japan and made to travel by land all the way to Tokyo. I have heard the trip took almost a year.

Evidently the Royal family of Okinawa returned but never reclaimed the thrown as they once had. However Okinawa was still kind of like Guam is to the US today…….a protectorate, and then in 1879 became a prefecture. Oddly enough Okinawans still needed authorization to go to “Japan” and work even in the 1920’s. Kind of odd for someone from the same country to have such a requirement.

If my understanding is correct the Okianwan Gov. or possibly the Royal family was still paying tribute to the Chinese, most likely the Chinese Emperor.

bignick
04-14-2005, 12:12 AM
The TKD I have seen in Korea and the US used Shotokan kata as it's core curriculum.

In fact I saw very little training that didn’t look like it came from shotokan. The one difference I did see was emphasis on kicks….and high ones at that. The kata were the same basic kata but done a little “bouncier”. Other than that there is not much difference except maybe the commands that were given in Korean. Not to many do the Japanese forms anymore, but there are some taekwondo schools that do. Although the palgwe series, the firt ones the WTF created, resemble very strongly some of the Japanese forms. I had a nice little suprise watching my jujutsu instructor test some of his karate students and a lot of the time I had a pretty good guess as to how the kata went. The movements were generally similar though executed with a different emphasis and style.


I have noticed also that some Koreans do NOT like it when you say something about TKD coming from Japan. Very sensitive historical point for them.

Some have been down right “ultra right wingers” about TKD being a “pure Korean” art. Maybe they figure National Pride gives them the right to re-write some of their martial history. Hear it all the time. "Tae Kwon Do is a 2000 year old Korean martial art...blah, blah, blah" Just smile and nod, some people need their illusions.


Hell the Japanese are just as bad……they think Karate is a Japanese invention like Judo and Kendo. I don't doubt it.

arnisador
04-14-2005, 12:45 AM
As a result of the Japanese invasion of 1609 the king of Okinawa was taken to Edo (Tokyo) for his own “protection”, read held prisoner.

He was taken to some part of southern Japan and made to travel by land all the way to Tokyo. I have heard the trip took almost a year.

Evidently the Royal family of Okinawa returned but never reclaimed the thrown as they once had. However Okinawa was still kind of like Guam is to the US today…….a protectorate, and then in 1879 became a prefecture. Oddly enough Okinawans still needed authorization to go to “Japan” and work even in the 1920’s. Kind of odd for someone from the same country to have such a requirement.

If my understanding is correct the Okianwan Gov. or possibly the Royal family was still paying tribute to the Chinese, most likely the Chinese Emperor.
Interesting! I had heard that they were relocated a few years after the 1879 action, and I knew they had been under Japanese control for a long time before that and that they had always been caught between China and Japan, but I hadn't known that the royal family had first been evacuated 400 years ago! I need to find an accessible history of Okinawa--"Okinawan History for Karateka" or something.

RRouuselot
04-14-2005, 01:09 AM
I need to find an accessible history of Okinawa--"Okinawan History for Karateka" or something.
Le tme look around and see if I can find something in English

RBaddorf
04-14-2005, 04:03 AM
http://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/003/index_e.html


Official Okinawa web site.

RBaddorf
04-14-2005, 04:06 AM
http://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/

Martial Arts portion of official Okinawa site. Has interesting history section.

Enjoy. Notice Okinawan 10th Dans wear only 3 stripes on their belts (if they wear any at all).

RBaddorf
04-14-2005, 04:07 AM
http://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/001/001/images/title.gifNext (http://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/001/002/index.html) [1] [2] (http://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/001/002/index.html)http://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/images/spacer.gifhttp://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/001/001/images/001.jpgCommemorating the establishment of the basic kata of karate-do (1937)
(Front, from right) Chojun Miyagi, Chomo Hanashiro, Kentsu Yabu, Chotoku Kyan(Back, from right) Genwa Nakasone, Choshin Chibana, Choryo Maeshiro, Shinpan Shiroma.It is said that the traditional Okinawan martial arts called Te and Chinese Kenpo were blended together and developed into karate. Karate later underwent significant developments in Okinawa based on several factors, including the policy of banning weapons following the political centralization of King Shoshin (1477-1526) and the Satsuma Clan's invasion of Ryukyu (1609).
http://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/001/001/images/002.jpgChotoku Kyan (2nd from left, 1941)It later developed further through a process of systematization into 'Modern Karate', which actually had a lot to do with the efforts of the men known as the Chuko no so (The Revivers), including Sokon Matsumura (1828-1898) of the Shuri-te style, Kosaku Matsumora (1829-1898) of the Tomari-te style and Kanryo Higaonna (1853-1915) of the Naha-te style.

In 1908, 'The 10 Articles of Karate' prepared by Anko Itosu were submitted to the Educational Affairs Section of Okinawa Prefecture. After that, karate started being introduced into the school gymnastics curriculum, thus acquiring broad accessibility, in contrast to the previously secret principles of Isshi-soden (the complete transmission of a ryu's techniques only to your heir).http://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/images/spacer.gifhttp://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/001/001/images/movie01.gifhttp://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/001/001/images/movie02.jpg
MOVIE 3:03 http://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/images/spacer.gifhttp://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/images/spacer.gifReal Player : narrow band width (http://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/001/001/n_012e.ram) (26.5mb)
Real Player : broad band with (http://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/001/001/b_012e.ram) (68.8mb)http://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/images/spacer.gifhttp://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/images/spacer.gifhttp://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/images/spacer.gifWindows Media Player : narrow band width (http://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/001/001/n_012e.wvx)(11.4mb)
Windows Media Player : broad band with (http://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/001/001/b_012e.wvx) (21.5mb)Click here for Plug-In (http://www.wonder-okinawa.jp/023/eng/001/001/index.html#)

RRouuselot
04-16-2005, 03:56 AM
Ok here is the problem I have with the present mainstream version of karate history.

Did all karate come from the Itosu/ Sakugawa tode line of karate?

Answer: No

So why is it 99% of the karate history today is written as such?

Answer: poor research or lack of motivation to do "other" research.

There were other prominent karateka around at the same time.

47MartialMan
04-16-2005, 04:02 AM
There were other prominent karateka around at the same time.
name a few

TimoS
04-16-2005, 04:16 AM
name a few

Apparently there aren't many currently known karate "ancestors" who were around when "tode" Sakugawa was around but other contemporaries of Itosu was e.g. Kanryo Higashionna, although Itosu seems to have been somewhat older

RRouuselot
04-16-2005, 04:18 AM
name a few
I always like they way you ask your questions with such politeness. :rolleyes:



1) Kogusuku Uekata

2) Bushi Maezato

3) Seijin Tanmei

4) Karyu Uku

5) Tokumine Peichin

6) Kosaku Matumora

7) Maeda Peichin

8) Shiroma Gusukuma

9) Chunna Tanmei

10) Bushi Kuniyoshi

RRouuselot
04-16-2005, 04:23 AM
Apparently there aren't many currently known karate "ancestors" who were around when "tode" Sakugawa was around but other contemporaries of Itosu was e.g. Kanryo Higashionna, although Itosu seems to have been somewhat older
Actually some of the people I listed below were alive at the same time as he was.

TimoS
04-16-2005, 04:23 AM
1) Kogusuku Uekata

2) Bushi Maezato

3) Seijin Tanmei

4) Karyu Uku

5) Tokumine Peichin

6) Kosaku Matumora

7) Maeda Peichin

8) Shiroma Gusukuma

9) Chunna Tanmei

10) Bushi Kuniyoshi

Most of those are quite unknown names. How many of them have their own lineage that still exists ?

TimoS
04-16-2005, 04:25 AM
Actually some of the people I listed below were alive at the same time as he was.

I don't doubt that. I was just looking it up from one book that I happened to have open and there weren't too many listed :)

RRouuselot
04-16-2005, 04:32 AM
Most of those are quite unknown names. How many of them have their own lineage that still exists ?
During their day most people on that list knew one kata maybe two and that was their “style”*, and yet some of them were major players in Okinawan MA.





*Kusanku for example is said to have only taught one kata, the one that bears his name.

roninrogue
04-24-2005, 05:50 PM
One of the names you fail to mention, not so much you as maybe your text.

Is Master Uechi Kanei, the man that started the Okinawan style of Karated known as Uechi-Ryu. That was where I recieved my beginning formal martial arts and have wondered since I am sure Master Kanei is now deceased from age.

Would still be interested to know what dojos are still operating and teaching same. Or how well as a martial art it is surviving. A person last fall lamented that Uechi Ryu was an almost vanishing martial art.

arnisador
04-24-2005, 06:15 PM
I studied it briefly in Providence, RI. See http://www.uechi-ryu.com/ and also search this site for more info.

I think his grandson is now the head, and of course there are splinter orgs. It's still a lesser known style, but not in any danger of dying out I think.

RRouuselot
04-24-2005, 06:24 PM
1)One of the names you fail to mention, not so much you as maybe your text.

2)Is Master Uechi Kanei, the man that started the Okinawan style of Karated known as Uechi-Ryu. That was where I recieved my beginning formal martial arts and have wondered since I am sure Master Kanei is now deceased from age.

3)Would still be interested to know what dojos are still operating and teaching same. Or how well as a martial art it is surviving. A person last fall lamented that Uechi Ryu was an almost vanishing martial art.
1)I didn’t forget him but purposely left him and several others out since there is extensive information written about them, their training, and where they receive their training.

2)Actually it was Kanyei's father Kanbun that started Uechi Ryu, the father died in 1948.

3)There are a lot of Uechi ryu dojo…..do an internet search and you can find them. Start with George E. Matteson in the US..........

searcher
04-25-2005, 03:56 PM
I always like they way you ask your questions with such politeness. :rolleyes:



1)Kogusuku Uekata

2)Bushi Maezato

3)Seijin Tanmei

4)Karyu Uku

5)Tokumine Peichin

6)Kosaku Matumora

7)Maeda Peichin

8)Shiroma Gusukuma

9)Chunna Tanmei

10)Bushi Kuniyoshi
What about Seisho Aragaki? He taught many of the masters of today's karate style: Kanryo Higaonna, Funakoshi, Chitose, Mabuni. Many consider him to be the premier martial artist of his day, but he is so often overlooked.

RRouuselot
04-25-2005, 09:31 PM
Here is something odd....... to date I have yet to see a photo/drawing of Funakoshi's teacher Azato. We see plenty on Itosu........just struck me as odd for all the he is mentioned.

47MartialMan
04-25-2005, 10:05 PM
Could it be that not all instructors take pictures or think of taking them? or that there wasn't a camera easliy available/aceesible? Weren't cameras a rare object to have?

searcher
04-25-2005, 10:42 PM
I almost forgot Nakaima of Ryuei-ryu. A closed family style until the 70's.

RRouuselot
04-25-2005, 11:39 PM
Could it be that not all instructors take pictures or think of taking them? or that there wasn't a camera easliy available/aceesible? Weren't cameras a rare object to have?
Re-read my post. It says photo or drawing. You would think if there is a photo of Sakugawa tode floating around then why not Azato........

RRouuselot
04-25-2005, 11:40 PM
I almost forgot Nakaima of Ryuei-ryu. A closed family style until the 70's.
There is actually a lot of info on Nakaima and Ryuei-Ryu

47MartialMan
04-26-2005, 12:54 AM
Re-read my post. It says photo or drawing. You would think if there is a photo of Sakugawa tode floating around then why not Azato........
So are you saying that he was a fictious charecter?

RRouuselot
04-26-2005, 01:30 AM
So are you saying that he was a fictious charecter?
If I thought so I would have said so.

RRouuselot
04-26-2005, 01:34 AM
1) What about Seisho Aragaki?
2) He taught many of the masters of today's karate style: Kanryo Higaonna, Funakoshi, Chitose, Mabuni.
Many consider him to be the premier martial artist of his day, but he is so often overlooked.
1) Yes, another "unsung hero" of his day. I have found a few drawings of him and bits of info but he is rarely mentioned.
2) Which is why I find it odd he has not been mentioned more often.

47MartialMan
04-26-2005, 06:26 PM
If I thought so I would have said so.
It just sounded like an implication when drawings or pics are not available.

The Kai
04-26-2005, 07:25 PM
I think that you need to realize during ww2 the allied forces intent on okinwan as a landing spot shelled, mortered and f**ked up Okinwan. There are Photos of shurie looking like a field that was thourghly and crudely plowed. The Castle was obliterated. With complete devestation of the town of Shuri what record would survive???

47MartialMan
04-26-2005, 07:27 PM
I think that you need to realize during ww2 the allied forces intent on okinwan as a landing spot shelled, mortered and f**ked up Okinwan. There are Photos of shurie looking like a field that was thourghly and crudely plowed. The Castle was obliterated. With complete devestation of the town of Shuri what record would survive???
Does this imply to photos of people?

Lucky some survived

RRouuselot
04-26-2005, 08:07 PM
Does this imply to photos of people?

No, you see when a building or house blows up onl the photographs of famous karateka remain....... :rolleyes:

RRouuselot
04-26-2005, 08:18 PM
I think that you need to realize during ww2 the allied forces intent on okinwan as a landing spot shelled, mortered and f**ked up Okinwan. There are Photos of shurie looking like a field that was thourghly and crudely plowed. The Castle was obliterated. With complete devestation of the town of Shuri what record would survive???

I have a book of photographs taken in Okinawa during and right after the battle of Okinawa.
You would not believe the destruction. I am surprised a single photograph or document survived.
However, like with much of karate history on Okinawa, there is/was always verbal transmission.

The Kai
04-26-2005, 09:59 PM
From the Photos I've seen the Village was reduced to a scarred, burned and pitted field. Lierally according to soldiers account only 2 sepaerate walls survivesd from the entire village!!I would hate to guess at what Karate artifacts never made it. There are photos posted on the "net-look at em and see for yourself

47MartialMan
04-27-2005, 06:47 PM
I have a book of photographs taken in Okinawa during and right after the battle of Okinawa.
You would not believe the destruction. I am surprised a single photograph or document survived.
However, like with much of karate history on Okinawa, there is/was always verbal transmission.
With only verbal transmission, how can one bleieve or prove that such a person existed?

RRouuselot
04-27-2005, 07:12 PM
With only verbal transmission, how can one bleieve or prove that such a person existed?
Corroboration from several sources.
Do you actually think about the questions you ask before you write them?

47MartialMan
04-27-2005, 08:44 PM
Lets say one person said so. Then anither took it off that one. Then two more took it of those. Does the person still exist?


You say Corroboration from several sources. My own situation has the same. Yet you doubt me.

RRouuselot
04-27-2005, 08:56 PM
1)Lets say one person said so. Then anither took it off that one. Then two more took it of those. Does the person still exist?


2) My own situation has the same. Yet you doubt me.

1)Reliable sources have corroborated his existance………end of discussion.

2)So you say. However, you have yet to cough up a certificate you claim to have that might lend some credibility to your story, you claim to have trained in a style that doesn’t exist, you claim to have trained from an Okinawan and yet when you gave his name it was two Japanese family names, not Okinawan, and also claimed it was his first and last name which is ridiculous, when I pointed this out you then claimed he went by several names as did your other teacher that supposedly ripped you off and THEN changed tack and claimed you were a “victim”…… Each time a discrepancy in your story was shown to you you then tweaked your story to go in a different direction.....sounds like BS to me.


So your situation with your bogus teachers is not even close that of the aforementioned.

tshadowchaser
04-27-2005, 09:05 PM
This has been an informative thread for the most part

Mod. Note.
Please, return to the original topic.
Sheldon Bedell
-MT Moderator-

47MartialMan
04-27-2005, 09:07 PM
So the Japanese took karate as they took Okinawa?

RRouuselot
04-27-2005, 09:08 PM
This has been an informative thread for the most part

Mod. Note.
Please, return to the original topic.
Sheldon Bedell
-MT Moderator-
I thought so as well until 47MartialMan decided to go on a petty vendetta and pick issue.

RRouuselot
04-27-2005, 09:11 PM
So the Japanese took karate as they took Okinawa?
You “questions” seem to be more like comments that try to agitate or bait.

Maybe you should ask something that looks like a sincere question.

47MartialMan
04-27-2005, 09:13 PM
I was just wondering how, per Okinawan history, that sources are creditable without documentation and photographs?.

In relation to the same nowadays?

Some Hawaiians beleive that the US "took" Hawaii, but yet things on those islands still remain indigenious. Whereas when Japan gained control over Okinawa, are things still indigenious there? Perhaps no longer Karate?

Not this is not a rant about Japan or the Japanese people. It is to come to an understanding that Okinawa's culture still Okinwan per most part, or they have much Japanese influences nowadays?

RRouuselot
04-27-2005, 09:30 PM
1)I was just wondering how, per Okinawan history, that sources are creditable without documentation and photographs?.

In relation to the same nowadays?

2) Some Hawaiians beleive that the US "took" Hawaii, but yet things on those islands still remain indigenious. Whereas when Japan gained control over Okinawa, are things still indigenious there? Perhaps no longer Karate?

Not this is not a rant about Japan or the Japanese people. It is to come to an understanding that Okinawa's culture still Okinwan per most part, or they have much Japanese influences nowadays?
1)There is documentation in several books of the Azato
's existence. The man was friends with Itosu, a well noted and well documented karate figure, Azato was also the teacher of several well noted karateka. This FACT has been documented and corroborated by respected individuals. I mentioned it was odd there were no photographs or drawings as an observation…..not as a witch hunt. I have yet to see a photograph of Moses……so by your logic it might not have existed.

2)There are very few “pure” Hawaiians left, much of the Hawaiian culture has been infused with western culture. There is however some very Hawaiian culture still around. Okinawans, unlike Hawaiians and the west, have coexisted with Japan and China for centuries. There are still many indigenous things in Okinawa, karate being one of them. If you would like to more information perhaps you should go there.

RRouuselot
04-27-2005, 09:33 PM
So the Japanese took karate as they took Okinawa?
You really need to study your history on this matter before we can have any sort of discussion. I feel your being quite selfish asking me to bring you up to speed on this because you haven’t/can’t/won’t research it yourself.

47MartialMan
04-27-2005, 10:49 PM
Nah, just posting ponerance in relation to the thread.

arnisador
04-27-2005, 11:16 PM
I don't think the Japanese took Karate...I don't think that that was something they wanted.

47MartialMan
04-28-2005, 12:05 AM
What i meant by took it does many Jaoanese Karate schools show homeage orl ineage to Okinawa?

arnisador
04-28-2005, 12:31 AM
I guess all Japanese karate schools are derived from Okinawan systems, if karate is used in the strict sense (not as in TKD is "Korean karate"). I'm not sure about "homage" though; I guess I'd say that in my experience, Japanese karateka don't unduly emphasize the Okinawan connection, but I've never heard one deny it.

I don't think I quite understand what you're getting at with these questions?

47MartialMan
04-28-2005, 01:42 AM
I mean, could it actually be true that Karate was not Okinawan given, at least, by the very essence of its name? In what other manner, per even any particular technique or method, could it even be indigenious of Okinawa and not practiced other than on Okinawa? So given certain accounts, can it be Okinawan or of Okinawa? Of meaning just happened to be there, by incident, but not actually developed there.

The notion of it being developed by peasants to over-throw a magnificent armed force? Or the notion that it was practice by the island nobels, as though they were rich or wealthy without mainland exchange. Thus exchange was on other things.
Could it be, that Okinawa, was a "mutual" place where China and Japan could still do trade, etc., without "losing face" via direct exchange? Thus so, such a mutual place could have only transmitted information that wasn't truely developed there, per only passed on?

And without documents or other materialistic proof, can it be stated that such was developed there or that certain people had actually existed there?
Could it be a hoax that it was just another martial art that its actual history or ties are shrouded without the concrete burden of proof that it had actually developed there. And that certain persons tied into this had been fabricated or much detail is not accredited.

RRouuselot
04-28-2005, 02:04 AM
1) I mean, could it actually be true that Karate was not Okinawan given, at least, by the very essence of its name? In what other manner, per even any particular technique or method, could it even be indigenious of Okinawa and not practiced other than on Okinawa? So given certain accounts, can it be Okinawan or of Okinawa? Of meaning just happened to be there, by incident, but not actually developed there.

2) The notion of it being developed by peasants to over-throw a magnificent armed force? Or the notion that it was practice by the island nobels, as though they were rich or wealthy without mainland exchange. Thus exchange was on other things.
Could it be, that Okinawa, was a "mutual" place where China and Japan could still do trade, etc., without "losing face" via direct exchange? Thus so, such a mutual place could have only transmitted information that wasn't truely developed there, per only passed on?

3) And without documents or other materialistic proof, can it be stated that such was developed there or that certain people had actually existed there?


1) As I said before, do your own research and you might come up with the answers to your questions.

2) Again, do your research and you will find the “peasant theory” to be inaccurate.

3) There are many documents that discuss karate, it’s beginnings, and subsequent development. There is plenty of information in both Japanese and English if you actually look for it you can find it. I would post it but I have posted material on this subject countless times over the years on various boards and feel no need to do it again just for you. Do some searching on your own.

47MartialMan
04-28-2005, 08:21 AM
Well, it wasn't directed to you to answer.

And, if you take such as truths, then I have understood you as something different.

And, yes, I have perfrom much research and there are many diffferent accounts whereas can any be truely accurate.

And, I was checking to see if anyone may have something else to say differently.

RRouuselot
04-28-2005, 08:27 AM
Well, it wasn't directed to you to answer.

1) And, if you take such as truths, then I have understood you as something different.

2) And, yes, I have perfrom much research and there are many diffferent accounts whereas can any be truely accurate.

3) And, I was checking to see if anyone may have something else to say differently. 1) you have no idea of what I take or don't take as truths.....I have researched this in English as well as Japanese, seen rare documents on the subject as well, talked to many highly resepected people that have cunducted extensive research in the field on this topic........and you have done what?....a GOGGLE search?
2) See my first reply.
3) yeah right... :rolleyes:

47MartialMan
04-28-2005, 08:36 AM
1.) You have no idea of who I am. What I know or learned, and you take the presumption that I had googled. (And I did state:And, if you take such as truths, then I have understood you as something different.)


2.) Rare documents dateing to when?

3.) And I didnt ask you to post info that you may had on other forums countless times. Whereas every forum there is the evidence of repeated posts/thread/information anyway. So if you dont desire to post info, then let others reply.



Now, lets see, where was I:

Yes, if Okinawa considered Japan mowadays, could the inhabitants still be true Okinawans?

Likewise, Italian/Irish, etc, being born, say for instance in the US. Are they Americans or truely Italians/Irish, etc.,

RRouuselot
04-28-2005, 08:49 AM
1.) You have no idea of who I am. What I know or learned, and you take the presumption that I had googled. (And I did state:And, if you take such as truths, then I have understood you as something different.)


2.) Rare documents dateing to when?

3.) And I didnt ask you to post info that you may had on other forums countless times. Whereas every forum there is the evidence of repeated posts/thread/information anyway. So if you dont desire to post info, then let others reply.



4) Now, lets see, where was I:

5) Yes, if Okinawa considered Japan mowadays, could the inhabitants still be true Okinawans?

6) Likewise, Italian/Irish, etc, being born, say for instance in the US. Are they Americans or truely Italians/Irish, etc.,

1) name your sources…..your “Okinawan” teacher….:rofl:

2) Go to Hokama’s museum in Okinawa and have a look for yourself.

3) No, you bluntly asked for information and I posted it on more than a few occasions.

4) You were trolling…….

5) Go there and ask an Okinawan if they are Japanese or Okinawan……oh but that’s right you studied from an “Okinawan” :rolleyes: didn’t you…

6) Okinawan’s have been proven to be a genetically different race. I have also posted this as well as a lot of other facts about Okinawa, karate etc. on this board as well as E-Budo and other boards, I will not waste my time or energy re-posting it for the likes of you.

The Kai
04-28-2005, 10:10 AM
47 Martial Man. Pick up a copy of Shotokan's secret by Bruce Clayton, allthough it is a little pro Funakoshi-it will give you a better picture of the political forces that gave rise to Karate.

As I understand it once TE made it to Japan, the japanese did everything in thier power to tweak the history a tad. Not so much to elimante any connection to Okinwa or China but to kinda gloss over the history

47MartialMan
04-28-2005, 06:38 PM
Thanks to all who posted informatively.

I started the thread:
Because Okinawa is considered part of Japan's prefecture, is Karate still considered as a Japanese art?

This post had started out of a recent conversation between a student of mine and me. I started his training and/or exposure to martial arts when he was at the age of ten. During my teachings and from past experiences, I told him, like all of my students, to not take anything for mere granted, even such as my own words. Studying Buddhism, and taking a sample from the Kalama Sutra, I wanted my students to be aware of many things that were not instilled to me from a couple of my previous/first instructors. Later, I had finally found three instructors, and at different time intervals, which had a better outlook on martial arts. Thus, using their influences has had me to present the same areas onto my students, per even philosophies.

Back to this particular student as afore-mentioned. After he had graduated from high school, which no one but I thought he would, he was confused on what to do with his new lifestyle. I had suggested for him to join a military arm force (pre- Iraq War). Thinking that he was going to sign up in either the Navy or the Air Force, he had surprised me, and others, with his decision to join the Marines. He called me with excitement and stated that he was in Japan. To my surprise, I had replied’ “Was he in Tokyo?” To his surprise, he had listened to as I did not pronounce it as Toh-key-oh.

With other exchanges of greeting, he had stated that he was on Okinawa and he wanted to study Okinawan Karate. I had replied; “How could he truly study Okinawan Karate?” By the sound of his confusion, I had informed him that perhaps Karate’s very name is Japanese or Japanese influenced. And that being part of Japan, can there still be a true Okinawan art? Giving example on how Italians/Irish, etc, in the US, can not truly be considered as the countries of origins. This meaning, per example food, Italian or Chinese food in the US cannot be considered as true food based in those countries.

Also, the display of other countries’ flags in a particular country as a symbol of respect or homage. Speaking to other martial artists with schools outside of the US, many do not display another country’s flag. And if such the case to pay homage, take Tae Kwon Do for example, (not bashing TKD), then why only display the Korean flag in an American school? Why not display a Jap one next to the Korean one as some TKD was influenced by the Japs? Further, way stop there? Why not display China’s flag next to the Jap flag, because Okinawans received many of the foundations of their art from mainland China?

So to label the origin of something is because of its true origins, its exact location, or for intrigue?

Because Okinawa is considered part of Japan's prefecture, is Karate still considered as a Japanese art? Thus, can Okinawans truely teach “Karate”?

RRouuselot
04-28-2005, 08:22 PM
............. During my teachings and from past experiences, I told him, like all of my students, to not take anything for mere granted, even such as my own words. Studying Buddhism, and taking a sample from the Kalama Sutra, I wanted my students to be aware of many things that were not instilled to me from a couple of my previous/first instructors. ..........
:rofl:
This is why I and some other people think you are full of BS. If your teachers “instilled” in you something from the Kama Sutra I would be worried.
The "kama sutra" is a book on Tantric Sex.....not Buddhism!

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

47MartialMan
04-28-2005, 08:48 PM
:rofl:
This is why I and some other people think you are full of BS. If your teachers “instilled” in you something from the Kama Sutra I would be worried.
The "kama sutra" is a book on Tantric Sex.....not Buddhism!

:rofl::rofl::rofl:No No no...this is why mods intervene.
You go off on a tangent and off topic.
And as though you actually know me.

I DID NOT SAY that my instructors had instilled any Buddhist practices per the Kalama Sutra...which I wonder if you know what it is.

It is the principle(s) of certain Buddhist studies, from MY own curiousity. However, the principle to go forth and learn other things were instilled to me from select teachers.

47MartialMan
04-28-2005, 08:52 PM
:rofl:
This is why I and some other people think you are full of BS. If your teachers “instilled” in you something from the Kama Sutra I would be worried.
The "kama sutra" is a book on Tantric Sex.....not Buddhism!

:rofl::rofl::rofl:
You always take my wording and posts out ofY context. As though youre so "high and mighty"...I did not state Kama sutra,,,,I spelled it Kalama Sutra.

RRouuselot
04-28-2005, 09:36 PM
You always take my wording and posts out ofY context. As though youre so "high and mighty"...I did not state Kama sutra,,,,I spelled it Kalama Sutra. Actually I liked your original post before the edit...it shows the real you:
Hello RRouuselot,

47MartialMan has just replied to a thread you have subscribed to entitled - Because Okinawa is.. - in the Karate forum of MartialTalk.Com.

This thread is located at:
http://www.martialtalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=23354&goto=newpost (http://showthread.php?t=23354&goto=newpost)

Here is the message that has just been posted:
***************
Youre stupid...I did not state Kama sutra,,,,I speleed it Kalama Sutra moron
***************


There may be other replies also, but you will not receive any more notifications until you visit the forum again.

Yours,
MartialTalk.Com team


I knew you meant this Sutra........but wuth your "gift" for spelling who can be sure what you really mean........

Kalama Sutra

"Rely not on the teacher/person, but on the teaching. Rely not on the words of the teaching, but on the
spirit of the words. Rely not on theory, but on experience.Do not believe in anything simply because you
have heard it. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. Do
not believe anything because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything because it is
written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and
elders. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is
conducive to the good and the benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it."

- the Buddha

47MartialMan
04-28-2005, 09:44 PM
Hmmn.....so you think that is amusing......

The "real" me.....is knowing the "real" you.

47MartialMan
04-28-2005, 09:46 PM
I bet you just googled it.....

RRouuselot
04-28-2005, 09:50 PM
I bet you just googled it.....
Uh actually no….my wife’s father is a Buddhist Priest…….there are literally 100’s of books around the house on Buddhism, most of which I have read.

47MartialMan
04-28-2005, 10:07 PM
well you just a smart fellow...give yourself a cookie

47MartialMan
04-28-2005, 10:30 PM
I knew you meant this Sutra........but wuth your "gift" for spelling who can be sure what you really mean........
Yeah, yea "high and mighty" never make a spelling error....Mr. Perfect......Mr. Know-It-All.....Mr. Debunker.........Mr Off Topic....

RRouuselot
04-28-2005, 10:32 PM
Yeah, yea "high and mighty" never make a spelling error....Mr. Perfect......Mr. Know-It-All.....Mr. Debunker.........Mr Off Topic....

i neever mayke speleeing erorrrs......I'n purfuct.

47MartialMan
04-28-2005, 10:36 PM
You sure are.

Bob Hubbard
04-28-2005, 10:43 PM
MOD NOTE
Thread closed pending review.